Erector spinae plane block versus transversus abdominis plane block on postoperative analgesia among patients undergoing hysterectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 1.2 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2026-07-02 eCollection Date: 2026-07-01 DOI:10.4103/sja.sja_39_26
Ahmed Goda Ahmed, Saeed Baradwan, Wael Mohamed Elmahdi Ibrahim, Othman Saadeldien Yahia, Doaa Mohamed Almonayery, Asmaa Ibraheim Tolba Gad, Amira Ibrahim Lashin, Mona Salah Eldin Sayed, Sherif Kamal Arafa, Ahmed Mohamed Abdelhakim, Amr Ahmed Magdy, Ahmed Abdelaziz Shama
{"title":"Erector spinae plane block versus transversus abdominis plane block on postoperative analgesia among patients undergoing hysterectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Ahmed Goda Ahmed, Saeed Baradwan, Wael Mohamed Elmahdi Ibrahim, Othman Saadeldien Yahia, Doaa Mohamed Almonayery, Asmaa Ibraheim Tolba Gad, Amira Ibrahim Lashin, Mona Salah Eldin Sayed, Sherif Kamal Arafa, Ahmed Mohamed Abdelhakim, Amr Ahmed Magdy, Ahmed Abdelaziz Shama","doi":"10.4103/sja.sja_39_26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While the transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) is commonly used for postoperative analgesia after abdominal procedures, the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has recently gained attention as an alternative regional anesthesia technique with potential advantages in managing visceral pain. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the analgesic efficacy of ESPB compared to TAPB under ultrasound guidance following hysterectomy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ESPB versus TAPB for pain relief in patients undergoing hysterectomy through January 2026. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan software: Review Manager (RevMan), version 5.4.0, The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark. The primary outcome was postoperative pain intensity assessed by the 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS), with clinical significance evaluated using minimal clinically important difference (MCID) analysis (threshold 1.0 cm). Secondary outcomes included postoperative opioid consumption and incidence of nausea and vomiting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six RCTs involving 447 patients were included. ESPB demonstrated significantly lower VAS pain scores compared to TAPB at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively (<i>P</i> < 0.001). MCID analysis revealed that clinical benefit was most pronounced in the early postoperative period, particularly at 2 h. Patients receiving ESPB had significantly lower 24-h opioid consumption (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and reduced incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (<i>P</i> = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ESPB demonstrates superior analgesia compared to TAPB following hysterectomy, particularly in the early postoperative period, with reduced opioid consumption and PONV incidence. Further research with standardized protocols is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":21533,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"20 3","pages":"491-499"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13436903/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_39_26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While the transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) is commonly used for postoperative analgesia after abdominal procedures, the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has recently gained attention as an alternative regional anesthesia technique with potential advantages in managing visceral pain. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the analgesic efficacy of ESPB compared to TAPB under ultrasound guidance following hysterectomy.

Materials and methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ESPB versus TAPB for pain relief in patients undergoing hysterectomy through January 2026. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan software: Review Manager (RevMan), version 5.4.0, The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark. The primary outcome was postoperative pain intensity assessed by the 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS), with clinical significance evaluated using minimal clinically important difference (MCID) analysis (threshold 1.0 cm). Secondary outcomes included postoperative opioid consumption and incidence of nausea and vomiting.

Results: Six RCTs involving 447 patients were included. ESPB demonstrated significantly lower VAS pain scores compared to TAPB at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively (P < 0.001). MCID analysis revealed that clinical benefit was most pronounced in the early postoperative period, particularly at 2 h. Patients receiving ESPB had significantly lower 24-h opioid consumption (P < 0.001) and reduced incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (P = 0.004).

Conclusion: ESPB demonstrates superior analgesia compared to TAPB following hysterectomy, particularly in the early postoperative period, with reduced opioid consumption and PONV incidence. Further research with standardized protocols is warranted.

竖脊平面阻滞与腹横平面阻滞对子宫切除术患者术后镇痛的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:虽然腹横平面阻滞(TAPB)通常用于腹部手术后的术后镇痛,但竖脊平面阻滞(ESPB)最近作为一种可替代的区域麻醉技术在处理内脏疼痛方面具有潜在的优势而受到关注。我们的目的是进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估超声引导下子宫切除术后ESPB与TAPB的镇痛效果。材料和方法:通过PubMed、Cochrane中央对照试验登记册、Web of Science和Scopus进行综合检索,以确定截至2026年1月,比较ESPB和TAPB在子宫切除术患者疼痛缓解方面的随机对照试验(rct)。meta分析采用RevMan软件:Review Manager (RevMan), version 5.4.0, The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark。主要终点是术后疼痛强度,采用10厘米视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估,临床意义采用最小临床重要差异(MCID)分析(阈值1.0厘米)评估。次要结局包括术后阿片类药物消耗和恶心呕吐发生率。结果:纳入6项随机对照试验,共纳入447例患者。ESPB在术后2、4、6、12和24小时的VAS疼痛评分明显低于TAPB (P < 0.001)。MCID分析显示,临床获益在术后早期最为明显,特别是在术后2小时。接受ESPB的患者24小时阿片类药物消耗显著降低(P < 0.001),术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)发生率降低(P = 0.004)。结论:与TAPB相比,ESPB在子宫切除术后表现出更好的镇痛效果,特别是在术后早期,减少了阿片类药物的消耗和PONV的发生率。进一步的标准化研究是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
141
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书