Association between the hospital frailty risk score and healthcare resource utilization after total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective observational study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-04 DOI:10.1177/10225536261476467
Linjia Li, Zhihan Wang, Yuanwei Wu, Qinfeng Yang, Zhen Huang, Jinghua Yang
{"title":"Association between the hospital frailty risk score and healthcare resource utilization after total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective observational study.","authors":"Linjia Li, Zhihan Wang, Yuanwei Wu, Qinfeng Yang, Zhen Huang, Jinghua Yang","doi":"10.1177/10225536261476467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundTotal Knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective treatment for end-stage knee osteoarthritis (KOA), but healthcare resource utilization has become an increasing concern in an aging surgical population. Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) has been associated with adverse surgical outcomes, but its impact on resource utilization after TKA remains unclear. Using a large national database, this study aims to evaluate the association between HFRS-defined frailty risk categories and healthcare resource utilization after TKA, including length of stay (LOS), total charges (TOTCHG), and non-routine discharge.MethodsData on patients undergoing TKA were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample database. Patients were categorized into an analytic cohort and a validation cohort. We used the HFRS to identify frailty: low frailty risk (HFRS < 5), intermediate frailty risk (5-15), and high frailty risk (HFRS > 15). Patient demographic, hospital characteristics, and comorbidities were assessed. Logistic regression analyses, stratified analyses, ROC curve analyses, and sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate associations, subgroup consistency, and discriminative performance.ResultsA total of 622,574 patients undergoing TKA for primary KOA were identified. Patients were categorized into low (n = 439,343), intermediate (n = 29,637), and high (n = 223) frailty risk groups according to the HFRS. In multivariable logistic regression analyses, higher HFRS-defined frailty risk categories were independently associated with increased healthcare resource utilization and complications. Compared with patients with low frailty risk, those with intermediate and high frailty risk had significantly higher odds of prolonged LOS, increased TOTCHG, non-routine discharge, any complication, and major complications (all <i>P</i> < 0.001). Sensitivity analyses using a binary classification of HFRS-defined frailty yielded consistent findings.ConclusionHFRS-defined frailty risk categories are independently associated with increased healthcare resource utilization and postoperative complications after TKA. These findings support the potential utility of HFRS for preoperative risk stratification and individualized perioperative care planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":16608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":"34 2","pages":"10225536261476467"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536261476467","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundTotal Knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective treatment for end-stage knee osteoarthritis (KOA), but healthcare resource utilization has become an increasing concern in an aging surgical population. Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) has been associated with adverse surgical outcomes, but its impact on resource utilization after TKA remains unclear. Using a large national database, this study aims to evaluate the association between HFRS-defined frailty risk categories and healthcare resource utilization after TKA, including length of stay (LOS), total charges (TOTCHG), and non-routine discharge.MethodsData on patients undergoing TKA were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample database. Patients were categorized into an analytic cohort and a validation cohort. We used the HFRS to identify frailty: low frailty risk (HFRS < 5), intermediate frailty risk (5-15), and high frailty risk (HFRS > 15). Patient demographic, hospital characteristics, and comorbidities were assessed. Logistic regression analyses, stratified analyses, ROC curve analyses, and sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate associations, subgroup consistency, and discriminative performance.ResultsA total of 622,574 patients undergoing TKA for primary KOA were identified. Patients were categorized into low (n = 439,343), intermediate (n = 29,637), and high (n = 223) frailty risk groups according to the HFRS. In multivariable logistic regression analyses, higher HFRS-defined frailty risk categories were independently associated with increased healthcare resource utilization and complications. Compared with patients with low frailty risk, those with intermediate and high frailty risk had significantly higher odds of prolonged LOS, increased TOTCHG, non-routine discharge, any complication, and major complications (all P < 0.001). Sensitivity analyses using a binary classification of HFRS-defined frailty yielded consistent findings.ConclusionHFRS-defined frailty risk categories are independently associated with increased healthcare resource utilization and postoperative complications after TKA. These findings support the potential utility of HFRS for preoperative risk stratification and individualized perioperative care planning.

全膝关节置换术后医院虚弱风险评分与医疗资源利用之间的关系:一项回顾性观察研究。
背景:全膝关节置换术(TKA)是治疗终末期膝关节骨关节炎(KOA)的有效方法,但随着手术人口的老龄化,医疗资源的利用越来越受到关注。医院虚弱风险评分(HFRS)与手术不良结果相关,但其对TKA后资源利用的影响尚不清楚。本研究利用一个大型的国家数据库,旨在评估hfrs定义的虚弱风险类别与TKA后医疗资源利用之间的关系,包括住院时间(LOS)、总费用(TOTCHG)和非常规出院。方法从全国住院患者样本数据库中提取TKA患者的数据。患者被分为分析队列和验证队列。我们使用HFRS来识别衰弱:低衰弱风险(HFRS < 5),中等衰弱风险(5-15)和高衰弱风险(HFRS bb0 -15)。评估患者人口统计学、医院特征和合并症。采用Logistic回归分析、分层分析、ROC曲线分析和敏感性分析来评价相关性、亚组一致性和判别性能。结果622574例原发性KOA患者接受TKA治疗。根据HFRS将患者分为低(n = 439,343),中(n = 29,637)和高(n = 223)虚弱风险组。在多变量logistic回归分析中,高hfrs定义的虚弱风险类别与医疗资源利用率和并发症的增加独立相关。与低衰弱风险患者相比,中等和高衰弱风险患者的LOS延长、TOTCHG增加、非常规出院、任何并发症和主要并发症的发生率均显著高于低衰弱风险患者(均P < 0.001)。使用hfrs定义的脆弱性二元分类的敏感性分析得出了一致的结果。结论hfrs定义的衰弱风险类别与TKA后医疗资源利用率和术后并发症的增加独立相关。这些发现支持了HFRS在术前风险分层和个体化围手术期护理计划中的潜在效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery is an open access peer-reviewed journal publishing original reviews and research articles on all aspects of orthopaedic surgery. It is the official journal of the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association. The journal welcomes and will publish materials of a diverse nature, from basic science research to clinical trials and surgical techniques. The journal encourages contributions from all parts of the world, but special emphasis is given to research of particular relevance to the Asia Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书