Why do bisphosphonates work in the treatment of CRPS? A translational pharmacological perspective to solve a conundrum.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Massimo Varenna, Chiara Crotti, Raffaele Di Taranto, Francesco Orsini, Francesca Zucchi
{"title":"Why do bisphosphonates work in the treatment of CRPS? A translational pharmacological perspective to solve a conundrum.","authors":"Massimo Varenna, Chiara Crotti, Raffaele Di Taranto, Francesco Orsini, Francesca Zucchi","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2026.2715376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bisphosphonates (BPs) have consistently yielded positive results in the treatment of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS). However, biochemical and histopathological evidence suggests that osteoclasts, the primary pharmacological target of BPs, is not a key driver in the early pathogenetic steps of CRPS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To critically review and integrate current evidence on pharmacological mechanisms of action of BPs in CRPS and to propose unifying hypotheses explaining their clinical efficacy beyond antiosteoclastic activity. Literature from <i>in vitro</i> studies, animal models, and randomized clinical trials was integrated. Approximately 80 primary and review articles were critically reviewed.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>BPs efficacy in CRPS is best explained by a bone-driven pharmacological model by which local drug accumulation is achieved in the site of disease. This enables modulation of inflammatory and nociceptive processes on adjacent non-bone cells, including macrophages, neutrophils, keratinocytes, and nociceptive fibers. Inhibition of the mevalonate pathway in these cells may reduce inflammatory cytokines, nerve growth factor (NGF), and reactive oxygen species (ROS), while modulating nociceptive signaling pathways. Additional mechanisms, including modulation of vascular tone and neuropeptide signaling, may further contribute to therapeutic effects. This hypothesis may inform optimal treatment strategies and together improve understanding of CRPS pathophysiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":12207,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"717-727"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2026.2715376","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Bisphosphonates (BPs) have consistently yielded positive results in the treatment of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS). However, biochemical and histopathological evidence suggests that osteoclasts, the primary pharmacological target of BPs, is not a key driver in the early pathogenetic steps of CRPS.

Methods: To critically review and integrate current evidence on pharmacological mechanisms of action of BPs in CRPS and to propose unifying hypotheses explaining their clinical efficacy beyond antiosteoclastic activity. Literature from in vitro studies, animal models, and randomized clinical trials was integrated. Approximately 80 primary and review articles were critically reviewed.

Expert opinion: BPs efficacy in CRPS is best explained by a bone-driven pharmacological model by which local drug accumulation is achieved in the site of disease. This enables modulation of inflammatory and nociceptive processes on adjacent non-bone cells, including macrophages, neutrophils, keratinocytes, and nociceptive fibers. Inhibition of the mevalonate pathway in these cells may reduce inflammatory cytokines, nerve growth factor (NGF), and reactive oxygen species (ROS), while modulating nociceptive signaling pathways. Additional mechanisms, including modulation of vascular tone and neuropeptide signaling, may further contribute to therapeutic effects. This hypothesis may inform optimal treatment strategies and together improve understanding of CRPS pathophysiology.

为什么双膦酸盐治疗CRPS有效?从翻译药理学的角度解决一个难题。
双膦酸盐(bp)在治疗复杂局部疼痛综合征(CRPS)方面一直取得积极的结果。然而,生化和组织病理学证据表明,破骨细胞,bp的主要药理靶点,并不是CRPS早期发病步骤的关键驱动因素。方法:批判性地回顾和整合目前关于bp在CRPS中作用的药理学机制的证据,并提出统一的假设来解释其除抗破骨活性外的临床疗效。来自体外研究、动物模型和随机临床试验的文献被整合。大约80篇初级和综述文章进行了批判性审查。专家意见:BPs对CRPS的疗效最好的解释是骨骼驱动的药理学模型,通过该模型,局部药物在疾病部位积累。这使得炎症和伤害性过程的调节邻近的非骨细胞,包括巨噬细胞、中性粒细胞、角化细胞和伤害性纤维。在这些细胞中抑制甲羟戊酸途径可能会减少炎症细胞因子、神经生长因子(NGF)和活性氧(ROS),同时调节伤害性信号通路。其他机制,包括血管张力和神经肽信号的调节,可能进一步促进治疗效果。这一假设可能为最佳治疗策略提供信息,并共同提高对CRPS病理生理的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Advances in drug development technologies are yielding innovative new therapies, from potentially lifesaving medicines to lifestyle products. In recent years, however, the cost of developing new drugs has soared, and concerns over drug resistance and pharmacoeconomics have come to the fore. Adverse reactions experienced at the clinical trial level serve as a constant reminder of the importance of rigorous safety and toxicity testing. Furthermore the advent of pharmacogenomics and ‘individualized’ approaches to therapy will demand a fresh approach to drug evaluation and healthcare delivery. Clinical Pharmacology provides an essential role in integrating the expertise of all of the specialists and players who are active in meeting such challenges in modern biomedical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书