Carlos Martínez-Pérez, Giovanni Tramonti, Charlene Kay, Karen J Taylor, Alastair Ironside, Arran K Turnbull, Peter S Hall
{"title":"The 21-gene recurrence score assay as a tool for predicting recurrence risk and guiding adjuvant treatment selection in early breast cancer.","authors":"Carlos Martínez-Pérez, Giovanni Tramonti, Charlene Kay, Karen J Taylor, Alastair Ironside, Arran K Turnbull, Peter S Hall","doi":"10.1080/14737159.2026.2709442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), HER2-negative breast cancer is the most common breast cancer subtype. While adjuvant endocrine therapy reduces recurrence risk, identifying which patients benefit from the addition of chemotherapy remains a key clinical challenge. The Oncotype DX® 21-gene Recurrence Score assay (Exact Sciences, via Genomic Health, Inc.) was developed to address this by quantifying distant recurrence risk and informing chemotherapy decisions in early-stage ER+/HER2- disease.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This diagnostic profile reviews the development, validation, and clinical evidence for Oncotype DX, including findings from the TAILORx and RxPONDER prospective trials and the subsequent development of hybrid tools integrating genomic and clinicopathological data. Alternative multiparameter molecular tests (MammaPrint, Prosigna, EndoPredict, Breast Cancer Index) are summarized and compared. We review international guideline recommendations, decision impact studies, cost-effectiveness evidence, and ongoing trials.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Oncotype DX has strong prognostic evidence and has meaningfully reduced chemotherapy use, though its case as a biomarker predictive of therapeutic effect from chemotherapy rests on trial designs with important limitations. Its independent prognostic contribution beyond comprehensive clinicopathological assessment requires further clarification, and cost-effectiveness varies substantially by indication and healthcare setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":12113,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":" ","pages":"723-732"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2026.2709442","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), HER2-negative breast cancer is the most common breast cancer subtype. While adjuvant endocrine therapy reduces recurrence risk, identifying which patients benefit from the addition of chemotherapy remains a key clinical challenge. The Oncotype DX® 21-gene Recurrence Score assay (Exact Sciences, via Genomic Health, Inc.) was developed to address this by quantifying distant recurrence risk and informing chemotherapy decisions in early-stage ER+/HER2- disease.
Areas covered: This diagnostic profile reviews the development, validation, and clinical evidence for Oncotype DX, including findings from the TAILORx and RxPONDER prospective trials and the subsequent development of hybrid tools integrating genomic and clinicopathological data. Alternative multiparameter molecular tests (MammaPrint, Prosigna, EndoPredict, Breast Cancer Index) are summarized and compared. We review international guideline recommendations, decision impact studies, cost-effectiveness evidence, and ongoing trials.
Expert opinion: Oncotype DX has strong prognostic evidence and has meaningfully reduced chemotherapy use, though its case as a biomarker predictive of therapeutic effect from chemotherapy rests on trial designs with important limitations. Its independent prognostic contribution beyond comprehensive clinicopathological assessment requires further clarification, and cost-effectiveness varies substantially by indication and healthcare setting.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics (ISSN 1473-7159) publishes expert reviews of the latest advancements in the field of molecular diagnostics including the detection and monitoring of the molecular causes of disease that are being translated into groundbreaking diagnostic and prognostic technologies to be used in the clinical diagnostic setting.
Each issue of Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics contains leading reviews on current and emerging topics relating to molecular diagnostics, subject to a rigorous peer review process; editorials discussing contentious issues in the field; diagnostic profiles featuring independent, expert evaluations of diagnostic tests; meeting reports of recent molecular diagnostics conferences and key paper evaluations featuring assessments of significant, recently published articles from specialists in molecular diagnostic therapy.
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics provides the forum for reporting the critical advances being made in this ever-expanding field, as well as the major challenges ahead in their clinical implementation. The journal delivers this information in concise, at-a-glance article formats: invaluable to a time-constrained community.