Reevaluation of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Expression in Breast Cancer Samples Previously Scored as Immunohistochemistry 0 or 1+ to Characterize HER2-Ultralow Prevalence.
Savitri Krishnamurthy, Clara Lam, Dhanrajan Tiruchinapalli, Linlin Luo, Rosemary Taylor, Ehab ElGabry, Michele Sue-Ann Woo, Simon M Collin, Simone T Sredni, Stella Redpath
{"title":"Reevaluation of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Expression in Breast Cancer Samples Previously Scored as Immunohistochemistry 0 or 1+ to Characterize HER2-Ultralow Prevalence.","authors":"Savitri Krishnamurthy, Clara Lam, Dhanrajan Tiruchinapalli, Linlin Luo, Rosemary Taylor, Ehab ElGabry, Michele Sue-Ann Woo, Simon M Collin, Simone T Sredni, Stella Redpath","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2025-0579-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Prevalence data of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-ultralow (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 0 with membrane staining in ≤10% of cells; HER2 IHC 0+) breast cancer are limited.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To evaluate the proportion of HER2-ultralow among metastatic breast cancer samples originally scored HER2 IHC 0 (with or absent membrane staining) and 1+ and to evaluate interobserver concordance between pathologists' rescores and original scores.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>Whole slide images (WSIs) from metastatic breast cancer biopsy specimens originally scored HER2 IHC 0 (with or absent membrane staining) and 1+ were rescored as HER2 IHC 0 absent membrane staining, IHC 0+ (with membrane staining), IHC 1+, or IHC 2+ by 3 pathologists. Each pathologist performed 2 blinded readings (washout period of ≥2 weeks).</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>Of the 246 IHC 0 WSIs, 78 (31.7%), 75 (30.5%), and 86 (35.0%) were rescored as HER2 IHC 0 absent membrane staining, 0+, and 1+, respectively. Of the 138 IHC 1+ WSIs, 3 (2.2%), 10 (7.2%), 117 (84.8%), and 6 (4.3%) were rescored as IHC 0 absent membrane staining, 0+, 1+, and 2+, respectively. Interobserver concordance was substantial (overall percentage agreement [OPA; 95% CI], 86.7% [82.9%-90.0%]; Cohen κ [95% CI], 0.781 [0.726-0.835]) to moderate (OPA [95% CI], 62.0% [59.9%-66.9%]; Cohen κ [95% CI], 0.441 [0.379-0.502]). Agreement between pathologists' consensus scores and original scores was moderate (OPA [95% CI], 72.1% [67.3%-76.5%]; Cohen κ [95% CI], 0.461 [0.381-0.541]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>Scoring discrepancies highlight the potential need/benefits of training for evaluating HER2-low/HER2-ultralow cases in metastatic breast cancer, which could improve consistency in HER2 scoring by pathologists.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2025-0579-OA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context.—: Prevalence data of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-ultralow (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 0 with membrane staining in ≤10% of cells; HER2 IHC 0+) breast cancer are limited.
Objective.—: To evaluate the proportion of HER2-ultralow among metastatic breast cancer samples originally scored HER2 IHC 0 (with or absent membrane staining) and 1+ and to evaluate interobserver concordance between pathologists' rescores and original scores.
Design.—: Whole slide images (WSIs) from metastatic breast cancer biopsy specimens originally scored HER2 IHC 0 (with or absent membrane staining) and 1+ were rescored as HER2 IHC 0 absent membrane staining, IHC 0+ (with membrane staining), IHC 1+, or IHC 2+ by 3 pathologists. Each pathologist performed 2 blinded readings (washout period of ≥2 weeks).
Results.—: Of the 246 IHC 0 WSIs, 78 (31.7%), 75 (30.5%), and 86 (35.0%) were rescored as HER2 IHC 0 absent membrane staining, 0+, and 1+, respectively. Of the 138 IHC 1+ WSIs, 3 (2.2%), 10 (7.2%), 117 (84.8%), and 6 (4.3%) were rescored as IHC 0 absent membrane staining, 0+, 1+, and 2+, respectively. Interobserver concordance was substantial (overall percentage agreement [OPA; 95% CI], 86.7% [82.9%-90.0%]; Cohen κ [95% CI], 0.781 [0.726-0.835]) to moderate (OPA [95% CI], 62.0% [59.9%-66.9%]; Cohen κ [95% CI], 0.441 [0.379-0.502]). Agreement between pathologists' consensus scores and original scores was moderate (OPA [95% CI], 72.1% [67.3%-76.5%]; Cohen κ [95% CI], 0.461 [0.381-0.541]).
Conclusions.—: Scoring discrepancies highlight the potential need/benefits of training for evaluating HER2-low/HER2-ultralow cases in metastatic breast cancer, which could improve consistency in HER2 scoring by pathologists.