Reevaluation of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Expression in Breast Cancer Samples Previously Scored as Immunohistochemistry 0 or 1+ to Characterize HER2-Ultralow Prevalence.

IF 3.2
Savitri Krishnamurthy, Clara Lam, Dhanrajan Tiruchinapalli, Linlin Luo, Rosemary Taylor, Ehab ElGabry, Michele Sue-Ann Woo, Simon M Collin, Simone T Sredni, Stella Redpath
{"title":"Reevaluation of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Expression in Breast Cancer Samples Previously Scored as Immunohistochemistry 0 or 1+ to Characterize HER2-Ultralow Prevalence.","authors":"Savitri Krishnamurthy, Clara Lam, Dhanrajan Tiruchinapalli, Linlin Luo, Rosemary Taylor, Ehab ElGabry, Michele Sue-Ann Woo, Simon M Collin, Simone T Sredni, Stella Redpath","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2025-0579-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Prevalence data of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-ultralow (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 0 with membrane staining in ≤10% of cells; HER2 IHC 0+) breast cancer are limited.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To evaluate the proportion of HER2-ultralow among metastatic breast cancer samples originally scored HER2 IHC 0 (with or absent membrane staining) and 1+ and to evaluate interobserver concordance between pathologists' rescores and original scores.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>Whole slide images (WSIs) from metastatic breast cancer biopsy specimens originally scored HER2 IHC 0 (with or absent membrane staining) and 1+ were rescored as HER2 IHC 0 absent membrane staining, IHC 0+ (with membrane staining), IHC 1+, or IHC 2+ by 3 pathologists. Each pathologist performed 2 blinded readings (washout period of ≥2 weeks).</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>Of the 246 IHC 0 WSIs, 78 (31.7%), 75 (30.5%), and 86 (35.0%) were rescored as HER2 IHC 0 absent membrane staining, 0+, and 1+, respectively. Of the 138 IHC 1+ WSIs, 3 (2.2%), 10 (7.2%), 117 (84.8%), and 6 (4.3%) were rescored as IHC 0 absent membrane staining, 0+, 1+, and 2+, respectively. Interobserver concordance was substantial (overall percentage agreement [OPA; 95% CI], 86.7% [82.9%-90.0%]; Cohen κ [95% CI], 0.781 [0.726-0.835]) to moderate (OPA [95% CI], 62.0% [59.9%-66.9%]; Cohen κ [95% CI], 0.441 [0.379-0.502]). Agreement between pathologists' consensus scores and original scores was moderate (OPA [95% CI], 72.1% [67.3%-76.5%]; Cohen κ [95% CI], 0.461 [0.381-0.541]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>Scoring discrepancies highlight the potential need/benefits of training for evaluating HER2-low/HER2-ultralow cases in metastatic breast cancer, which could improve consistency in HER2 scoring by pathologists.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2025-0579-OA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context.—: Prevalence data of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-ultralow (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 0 with membrane staining in ≤10% of cells; HER2 IHC 0+) breast cancer are limited.

Objective.—: To evaluate the proportion of HER2-ultralow among metastatic breast cancer samples originally scored HER2 IHC 0 (with or absent membrane staining) and 1+ and to evaluate interobserver concordance between pathologists' rescores and original scores.

Design.—: Whole slide images (WSIs) from metastatic breast cancer biopsy specimens originally scored HER2 IHC 0 (with or absent membrane staining) and 1+ were rescored as HER2 IHC 0 absent membrane staining, IHC 0+ (with membrane staining), IHC 1+, or IHC 2+ by 3 pathologists. Each pathologist performed 2 blinded readings (washout period of ≥2 weeks).

Results.—: Of the 246 IHC 0 WSIs, 78 (31.7%), 75 (30.5%), and 86 (35.0%) were rescored as HER2 IHC 0 absent membrane staining, 0+, and 1+, respectively. Of the 138 IHC 1+ WSIs, 3 (2.2%), 10 (7.2%), 117 (84.8%), and 6 (4.3%) were rescored as IHC 0 absent membrane staining, 0+, 1+, and 2+, respectively. Interobserver concordance was substantial (overall percentage agreement [OPA; 95% CI], 86.7% [82.9%-90.0%]; Cohen κ [95% CI], 0.781 [0.726-0.835]) to moderate (OPA [95% CI], 62.0% [59.9%-66.9%]; Cohen κ [95% CI], 0.441 [0.379-0.502]). Agreement between pathologists' consensus scores and original scores was moderate (OPA [95% CI], 72.1% [67.3%-76.5%]; Cohen κ [95% CI], 0.461 [0.381-0.541]).

Conclusions.—: Scoring discrepancies highlight the potential need/benefits of training for evaluating HER2-low/HER2-ultralow cases in metastatic breast cancer, which could improve consistency in HER2 scoring by pathologists.

重新评估人表皮生长因子受体2 (HER2)在先前免疫组化评分为0或1+的乳腺癌样本中的表达,以表征HER2的超低患病率。
上下文。-:人表皮生长因子受体2 (HER2)-超低(免疫组织化学[IHC] 0,膜染色≤10%的细胞;HER2 - IHC 0+)乳腺癌的患病率数据有限。-:评估HER2-超低在最初HER2 IHC评分为0(伴有或不伴有膜染色)和1+的转移性乳腺癌样本中的比例,并评估病理学家评分与原始评分之间的观察者之间的一致性。-:转移性乳腺癌活检标本的全切片图像(WSIs)最初评分为HER2 IHC 0(有或无膜染色)和1+,经3名病理学家重新评分为HER2 IHC 0(无膜染色)、IHC 0+(有膜染色)、IHC 1+或IHC 2+。每位病理学家进行2次盲法读数(洗脱期≥2周)。-: 246例IHC 0 wsi中,分别有78例(31.7%)、75例(30.5%)和86例(35.0%)恢复为HER2 IHC 0无膜染色、0+和1+。138例IHC 1+ wsi中,3例(2.2%)、10例(7.2%)、117例(84.8%)和6例(4.3%)分别为IHC 0无膜染色、0+、1+和2+。观察者间一致性显著(总体一致性百分比[OPA; 95% CI], 86.7% [82.9%-90.0%]; Cohen κ [95% CI], 0.781[0.726-0.835])至中度(OPA [95% CI], 62.0% [59.9%-66.9%]; Cohen κ [95% CI], 0.441[0.379-0.502])。病理医师共识评分与原始评分的一致性为中等(OPA [95% CI], 72.1% [67.3% ~ 76.5%]; Cohen κ [95% CI], 0.461[0.381 ~ 0.541])。-:评分差异突出了转移性乳腺癌中HER2低/HER2超低病例评估培训的潜在需求/益处,这可以提高病理学家HER2评分的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书