Perception, assessment, and coaching: a systematic review and taxonomy of computer vision-based physical rehabilitation techniques.

IF 2.5 Q3 REHABILITATION
Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences Pub Date : 2026-07-20 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fresc.2026.1906327
Ping Ye, Yu Li, Mengjian Qu, Jing Liu, Xiangqing Lu, Wenhui Cao, Rong Wang, Yaping Wan, Tao Zhu, Jun Zhou
{"title":"Perception, assessment, and coaching: a systematic review and taxonomy of computer vision-based physical rehabilitation techniques.","authors":"Ping Ye, Yu Li, Mengjian Qu, Jing Liu, Xiangqing Lu, Wenhui Cao, Rong Wang, Yaping Wan, Tao Zhu, Jun Zhou","doi":"10.3389/fresc.2026.1906327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The digital transformation of rehabilitation training has become a public health imperative driven by a global demand that outstrips professional medical resources and is compounded by a deficit in public rehabilitation literacy. As traditional hospital-centric models reach their scalability limits, there is a critical necessity for accessible home-based care solutions to ensure patients do not miss optimal recovery windows. To evaluate computer vision as a potential solution, this paper conducts a systematic review following the PRISMA 2020 reporting framework. We identify that its clinical migration faces a profound \"Paradigm Gap\" across three critical domains which this study aims to address: (1) the <b>Perception Domain</b>, where algorithms are constrained by inherent reconstruction ambiguities and pathological data scarcity; (2) the <b>Assessment Domain</b>, where a \"semantic gap\" persists between low-level features and clinical reasoning; and (3) the <b>Coaching Domain</b>, where feedback mechanisms fail to translate summative \"Knowledge of Results (KR)\" into actionable \"Knowledge of Performance (KP).\" We formulate and adopt \"Perception, Assessment, and Coaching (PAC)\" as a novel taxonomy to serve as a logical grid for systematically analyzing existing literature and elucidating technical pathways required to resolve these clinical challenges. This review synthesizes the technological landscape into three evolutionary trajectories: (1) In Perception, research is shifting toward constructing biomechanically consistent digital twins to eliminate visual hallucinations. (2) In Assessment, frontier methods are establishing interpretable clinical reasoning engines to achieve a leap from engineering parameters to Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) evidence. (3) In Coaching, focus lies in precise movement correction via semantic translation and multimodal strategies to support motor relearning. Furthermore, we explore the potential of Generative AI and Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) in reshaping interaction paradigms (e.g., Visual Self-Modeling) alongside critical discussions on ethical boundaries. Through a systematic literature review, this paper elucidates the task boundaries of rehabilitation vision and constructs the PAC taxonomy. It provides a robust theoretical roadmap and forward-looking guidance for the design of the next generation of clinically valid intelligent rehabilitation systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":73102,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","volume":"7 ","pages":"1906327"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13429716/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2026.1906327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The digital transformation of rehabilitation training has become a public health imperative driven by a global demand that outstrips professional medical resources and is compounded by a deficit in public rehabilitation literacy. As traditional hospital-centric models reach their scalability limits, there is a critical necessity for accessible home-based care solutions to ensure patients do not miss optimal recovery windows. To evaluate computer vision as a potential solution, this paper conducts a systematic review following the PRISMA 2020 reporting framework. We identify that its clinical migration faces a profound "Paradigm Gap" across three critical domains which this study aims to address: (1) the Perception Domain, where algorithms are constrained by inherent reconstruction ambiguities and pathological data scarcity; (2) the Assessment Domain, where a "semantic gap" persists between low-level features and clinical reasoning; and (3) the Coaching Domain, where feedback mechanisms fail to translate summative "Knowledge of Results (KR)" into actionable "Knowledge of Performance (KP)." We formulate and adopt "Perception, Assessment, and Coaching (PAC)" as a novel taxonomy to serve as a logical grid for systematically analyzing existing literature and elucidating technical pathways required to resolve these clinical challenges. This review synthesizes the technological landscape into three evolutionary trajectories: (1) In Perception, research is shifting toward constructing biomechanically consistent digital twins to eliminate visual hallucinations. (2) In Assessment, frontier methods are establishing interpretable clinical reasoning engines to achieve a leap from engineering parameters to Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) evidence. (3) In Coaching, focus lies in precise movement correction via semantic translation and multimodal strategies to support motor relearning. Furthermore, we explore the potential of Generative AI and Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) in reshaping interaction paradigms (e.g., Visual Self-Modeling) alongside critical discussions on ethical boundaries. Through a systematic literature review, this paper elucidates the task boundaries of rehabilitation vision and constructs the PAC taxonomy. It provides a robust theoretical roadmap and forward-looking guidance for the design of the next generation of clinically valid intelligent rehabilitation systems.

感知,评估和指导:基于计算机视觉的物理康复技术的系统回顾和分类。
由于全球需求超过专业医疗资源,加之公众康复素养不足,康复培训的数字化转型已成为公共卫生的当务之急。随着传统的以医院为中心的模式达到其可扩展性极限,迫切需要可访问的家庭护理解决方案,以确保患者不会错过最佳康复窗口。为了评估计算机视觉作为一种潜在的解决方案,本文根据PRISMA 2020报告框架进行了系统综述。我们发现其临床迁移在本研究旨在解决的三个关键领域面临深刻的“范式鸿沟”:(1)感知领域,其中算法受到固有的重建模糊性和病理数据稀缺性的限制;(2)评估领域,低级特征与临床推理之间存在“语义差距”;(3)教练领域,反馈机制无法将总结性的“结果知识(KR)”转化为可操作的“绩效知识(KP)”。我们制定并采用“感知、评估和指导(PAC)”作为一种新的分类法,作为系统分析现有文献和阐明解决这些临床挑战所需的技术途径的逻辑网格。这篇综述将技术景观综合为三个进化轨迹:(1)在感知方面,研究正在转向构建生物力学一致的数字双胞胎,以消除视觉幻觉。(2)在评估方面,前沿方法是建立可解释的临床推理引擎,实现从工程参数到循证医学证据的跨越。(3)在训练中,重点在于通过语义翻译和多模态策略进行精确的动作纠正,以支持运动再学习。此外,我们探讨了生成式人工智能和多模态大型语言模型(MLLMs)在重塑交互范式(例如,视觉自我建模)以及对伦理边界的关键讨论方面的潜力。本文通过系统的文献综述,阐明了康复视觉的任务边界,构建了康复视觉的分类体系。它为下一代临床有效的智能康复系统的设计提供了强大的理论路线图和前瞻性指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书