Former pour collaborer : panorama des formations à la collaboration et à la recherche participative en santé.

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Romaine Desjardin, Marie Préau
{"title":"Former pour collaborer : panorama des formations à la collaboration et à la recherche participative en santé.","authors":"Romaine Desjardin, Marie Préau","doi":"10.3917/spub.261.0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction&amp;#160;: With the growing expansion of participatory approaches in health, an increasing number of training initiatives have been developed to support these practices (Tourette-Turgis et al., 2019). However, these initiatives remain heterogeneous in their formats, objectives, and target audiences, reflecting a lack of consensus on what constitutes participatory approaches in practice (Paulo et al., 2023). Purpose of the research&amp;#160;: This study aims to explore French-speaking training programs that foster collaboration among researchers, health professionals, and citizens. It focuses in particular on the underlying processes of acculturation, especially the ways in which citizens are introduced to research norms and the functioning of the healthcare system. Drawing on a review of grey literature and scientific studies on the topic, the study identified a wide range of training initiatives designed to promote the involvement of diverse groups in health research projects. Results&amp;#160;: These programs most commonly seek to equip citizens and patients with the skills needed to participate in collaborative research. They vary according to the type of partnership (clinical, project, or educational) and the expected level of engagement, ranging from online modules to professional degree programs. Few initiatives, however, include specific training for health professionals. Conclusions&amp;#160;: Training represents a key lever for supporting collaboration by fostering mutual understanding, adjustment, and recognition. However the imbalance in training opportunities raises questions about power relations, the professionalization of patients, and the epistemological limits of certain participatory approaches, highlighting critical challenges for the co-construction of knowledge in health.</p>","PeriodicalId":49575,"journal":{"name":"Sante Publique","volume":"38 1","pages":"35-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sante Publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/spub.261.0035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction&#160;: With the growing expansion of participatory approaches in health, an increasing number of training initiatives have been developed to support these practices (Tourette-Turgis et al., 2019). However, these initiatives remain heterogeneous in their formats, objectives, and target audiences, reflecting a lack of consensus on what constitutes participatory approaches in practice (Paulo et al., 2023). Purpose of the research&#160;: This study aims to explore French-speaking training programs that foster collaboration among researchers, health professionals, and citizens. It focuses in particular on the underlying processes of acculturation, especially the ways in which citizens are introduced to research norms and the functioning of the healthcare system. Drawing on a review of grey literature and scientific studies on the topic, the study identified a wide range of training initiatives designed to promote the involvement of diverse groups in health research projects. Results&#160;: These programs most commonly seek to equip citizens and patients with the skills needed to participate in collaborative research. They vary according to the type of partnership (clinical, project, or educational) and the expected level of engagement, ranging from online modules to professional degree programs. Few initiatives, however, include specific training for health professionals. Conclusions&#160;: Training represents a key lever for supporting collaboration by fostering mutual understanding, adjustment, and recognition. However the imbalance in training opportunities raises questions about power relations, the professionalization of patients, and the epistemological limits of certain participatory approaches, highlighting critical challenges for the co-construction of knowledge in health.

合作培训:卫生领域合作和参与性研究培训概述。
Introduction& # 160;随着参与式卫生方法的不断扩大,越来越多的培训举措被制定出来支持这些做法(Tourette-Turgis等人,2019年)。然而,这些倡议在形式、目标和目标受众方面仍然是异质的,这反映了在实践中对参与式方法的构成缺乏共识(Paulo等人,2023)。研究目的&;#160;本研究旨在探讨法语培训计划,以促进研究人员、卫生专业人员和公民之间的合作。它特别关注文化适应的潜在过程,特别是公民被引入研究规范和医疗保健系统运作的方式。根据对有关该专题的灰色文献和科学研究的审查,该研究确定了一系列旨在促进不同群体参与卫生研究项目的培训举措。Results& # 160;这些项目通常旨在为公民和患者提供参与合作研究所需的技能。根据伙伴关系的类型(临床、项目或教育)和预期的参与程度,从在线模块到专业学位课程,它们会有所不同。然而,很少有倡议包括对保健专业人员的专门培训。Conclusions& # 160;培训是通过促进相互理解、调整和认可来支持合作的关键杠杆。然而,培训机会的不平衡引发了关于权力关系、患者专业化和某些参与式方法的认识论限制的问题,突出了卫生知识共同建设的关键挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sante Publique
Sante Publique PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
252
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: La revue Santé Publique s’adresse à l’ensemble des acteurs de santé publique qu’ils soient décideurs, professionnels de santé, acteurs de terrain, chercheurs, enseignants ou formateurs, etc. Elle publie des travaux de recherche, des évaluations, des analyses d’action, des réflexions sur des interventions de santé, des opinions, relevant des champs de la santé publique et de l’analyse des services de soins, des sciences sociales et de l’action sociale. Santé publique est une revue à comité de lecture, multidisciplinaire et généraliste, qui publie sur l’ensemble des thèmes de la santé publique parmi lesquels : accès et recours aux soins, déterminants et inégalités sociales de santé, prévention, éducation pour la santé, promotion de la santé, organisation des soins, environnement, formation des professionnels de santé, nutrition, politiques de santé, pratiques professionnelles, qualité des soins, gestion des risques sanitaires, représentation et santé perçue, santé scolaire, santé et travail, systèmes de santé, systèmes d’information, veille sanitaire, déterminants de la consommation de soins, organisation et économie des différents secteurs de production de soins (hôpital, médicament, etc.), évaluation médico-économique d’activités de soins ou de prévention et de programmes de santé, planification des ressources, politiques de régulation et de financement, etc
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书