Adam Christensen, Axay Parth, Mansi Kotak, Danka Radosavjevic, Catherine Gorman Moore, Byung-Woun Seo
{"title":"Open-Label, Balanced, Randomized, Single-Dose, Three-Treatment, Three-Sequence, Three-Period, Three-Way Crossover Oral Bioequivalence Study of Desmopressin Acetate Oral Solution","authors":"Adam Christensen, Axay Parth, Mansi Kotak, Danka Radosavjevic, Catherine Gorman Moore, Byung-Woun Seo","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Desmopressin is first-line therapy for central diabetes insipidus, also known as arginine vasopressin deficiency, but presents dosing challenges due to its narrow therapeutic index. This open-label, randomized, three-way crossover study evaluated the bioequivalence of a new desmopressin acetate oral solution (50 mcg/mL) compared to desmopressin acetate tablets (200 mcg) in 75 healthy adults. In a balanced, three-sequence, three-period design with 14-day washout periods, participants received a single 600-mcg dose of test product and reference product under fasted conditions. Plasma desmopressin concentrations were measured using a validated liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry method, and primary pharmacokinetic parameters (maximum plasma concentration [C<sub>max</sub>], area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration [AUC<sub>0–t</sub>], AUC from time 0 extrapolated to infinity [AUC<sub>0–∞</sub>]) were derived from resulting concentration–time profiles. Bioequivalence was assessed using analysis of variance on log-transformed parameters, with 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for geometric mean ratios 80%–125%. Results demonstrated bioequivalence between formulations, with geometric mean ratios of 101.9% (93.9%–110.5%) for C<sub>max</sub>, 103.7% (94.8%–113.5%) for AUC<sub>0–t</sub>, and 103.7% (94.9%–113.3%) for AUC<sub>0–∞</sub>. Both formulations exhibited similar pharmacokinetic profiles with 1.0 h median time to maximum concentration, ∼3.6 h mean elimination half-life, and 30%–33% intrasubject variability. Five adverse events were reported by five participants (6.7%), including two cases of hyponatremia (reference group) and one case of vomiting (test group); all were mild to moderate and resolved completely. This study establishes bioequivalence between desmopressin acetate oral solution and tablets, supporting regulatory approval of the oral solution formulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13434358/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpdd.70086","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Desmopressin is first-line therapy for central diabetes insipidus, also known as arginine vasopressin deficiency, but presents dosing challenges due to its narrow therapeutic index. This open-label, randomized, three-way crossover study evaluated the bioequivalence of a new desmopressin acetate oral solution (50 mcg/mL) compared to desmopressin acetate tablets (200 mcg) in 75 healthy adults. In a balanced, three-sequence, three-period design with 14-day washout periods, participants received a single 600-mcg dose of test product and reference product under fasted conditions. Plasma desmopressin concentrations were measured using a validated liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry method, and primary pharmacokinetic parameters (maximum plasma concentration [Cmax], area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration [AUC0–t], AUC from time 0 extrapolated to infinity [AUC0–∞]) were derived from resulting concentration–time profiles. Bioequivalence was assessed using analysis of variance on log-transformed parameters, with 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for geometric mean ratios 80%–125%. Results demonstrated bioequivalence between formulations, with geometric mean ratios of 101.9% (93.9%–110.5%) for Cmax, 103.7% (94.8%–113.5%) for AUC0–t, and 103.7% (94.9%–113.3%) for AUC0–∞. Both formulations exhibited similar pharmacokinetic profiles with 1.0 h median time to maximum concentration, ∼3.6 h mean elimination half-life, and 30%–33% intrasubject variability. Five adverse events were reported by five participants (6.7%), including two cases of hyponatremia (reference group) and one case of vomiting (test group); all were mild to moderate and resolved completely. This study establishes bioequivalence between desmopressin acetate oral solution and tablets, supporting regulatory approval of the oral solution formulation.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development is an international, peer-reviewed, online publication focused on publishing high-quality clinical pharmacology studies in drug development which are primarily (but not exclusively) performed in early development phases in healthy subjects.