Network-Based Stochastic Volatility Modeling for Interconnected Futures Markets

IF 2.8 4区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Journal of Futures Markets Pub Date : 2026-08-04 Epub Date: 2026-07-07 DOI:10.1002/fut.70127
Zain Ul Abideen, Kai Wu
{"title":"Network-Based Stochastic Volatility Modeling for Interconnected Futures Markets","authors":"Zain Ul Abideen,&nbsp;Kai Wu","doi":"10.1002/fut.70127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study introduces a novel network-based stochastic volatility model for futures markets, integrating graph theory with multivariate stochastic differential equations to capture cross-asset volatility spillovers. The model incorporates the graph Laplacian into volatility dynamics, overcoming a central limitation of traditional frameworks, such as the Heston model, which treat each asset's volatility as independent or fixed, and therefore cannot capture the topology-dependent transmission of volatility across linked markets. Theoretical properties, including positivity, stationarity, and affine pricing, are established, enabling efficient Fourier-based option pricing. Applications show that sparse, high-spillover network structures amplify volatility clustering, with kurtosis of 6–8 and elevated risk premia, whereas dense network structures stabilize volatility; we interpret these polar cases as stylized representations of emerging and developed markets, an interpretation we validate against real futures data in Appendix A. The model improves pricing accuracy by 8%–12% relative to Heston and reduces hedging variance by 10%–15%. Environmental, social, and governance integration via carbon futures nodes shows that sparse (emerging-market) networks experience 6%–8% higher energy-futures volatility following carbon-price shocks than dense (developed-market) networks (3%–4%), supporting sustainable finance and risk management applications.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15863,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Futures Markets","volume":"46 9","pages":"1700-1718"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Futures Markets","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fut.70127","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study introduces a novel network-based stochastic volatility model for futures markets, integrating graph theory with multivariate stochastic differential equations to capture cross-asset volatility spillovers. The model incorporates the graph Laplacian into volatility dynamics, overcoming a central limitation of traditional frameworks, such as the Heston model, which treat each asset's volatility as independent or fixed, and therefore cannot capture the topology-dependent transmission of volatility across linked markets. Theoretical properties, including positivity, stationarity, and affine pricing, are established, enabling efficient Fourier-based option pricing. Applications show that sparse, high-spillover network structures amplify volatility clustering, with kurtosis of 6–8 and elevated risk premia, whereas dense network structures stabilize volatility; we interpret these polar cases as stylized representations of emerging and developed markets, an interpretation we validate against real futures data in Appendix A. The model improves pricing accuracy by 8%–12% relative to Heston and reduces hedging variance by 10%–15%. Environmental, social, and governance integration via carbon futures nodes shows that sparse (emerging-market) networks experience 6%–8% higher energy-futures volatility following carbon-price shocks than dense (developed-market) networks (3%–4%), supporting sustainable finance and risk management applications.

基于网络的互联期货市场随机波动率模型
本文介绍了一种新的基于网络的期货市场随机波动模型,该模型将图论与多元随机微分方程相结合,以捕捉跨资产波动溢出效应。该模型将拉普拉斯图整合到波动动力学中,克服了传统框架(如赫斯顿模型)的中心限制,这些框架将每种资产的波动视为独立或固定的,因此无法捕获波动在关联市场之间的拓扑依赖传输。理论性质,包括正性,平稳性和仿射定价,建立了有效的基于傅立叶的期权定价。应用表明,稀疏、高溢出的网络结构放大了波动率的聚类,峰度为6-8,风险溢价增加,而密集的网络结构稳定了波动率;我们将这些极端情况解释为新兴市场和发达市场的风格化表示,我们根据附录a中的真实期货数据验证了这一解释。相对于赫斯顿,该模型将定价准确性提高了8%-12%,并将对冲方差降低了10%-15%。通过碳期货节点的环境、社会和治理整合表明,在碳价格冲击后,稀疏(新兴市场)网络的能源期货波动性比密集(发达市场)网络(3%-4%)高6%-8%,支持可持续金融和风险管理应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Futures Markets
Journal of Futures Markets BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
15.80%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: The Journal of Futures Markets chronicles the latest developments in financial futures and derivatives. It publishes timely, innovative articles written by leading finance academics and professionals. Coverage ranges from the highly practical to theoretical topics that include futures, derivatives, risk management and control, financial engineering, new financial instruments, hedging strategies, analysis of trading systems, legal, accounting, and regulatory issues, and portfolio optimization. This publication contains the very latest research from the top experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书