{"title":"Real-World Performance of Commercial Passive Formaldehyde Removal Products: Ineffectiveness and Undisclosed VOC Emissions","authors":"Yinxi Yao, Feiyang He, Zhipeng Tu, Haoyu Wei, Songdi Liao, Manni Zhu, Junyu Zheng, Yutong Liang","doi":"10.1021/acsestair.6c00046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Growing\r\npublic concern over indoor formaldehyde (HCHO) pollution\r\nhas driven rapid growth in the use of passive HCHO removal products,\r\nwhich are widely marketed as low-cost and electricity-free solutions.\r\nIn China, monthly sales of such products have reached millions of\r\nunits. However, their real-world performance and unintended impacts\r\non indoor air chemistry remain insufficiently characterized. Here,\r\nwe evaluated the performance of five passive HCHO removal products\r\nand their volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emissions in an unoccupied\r\noffice. None of the products measurably reduced HCHO concentrations\r\nunder realistic conditions. In contrast, substantial VOC emissions\r\nwere observed. A product claimed to be terpene-based emitted 192 μg\r\nof VOCs per gram of product consumed, with emissions dominated by\r\naromatic compounds (50.5%), while a titanium dioxide (TiO<sub>2</sub>)-based product emitted 155 μg g<sup>–1</sup> and was\r\nenriched in monoterpenoids (54.7%). Hazardous VOC signals, such as\r\nbenzene, toluene, and styrene, were detected, and monoterpene emissions\r\nmay have implications for indoor secondary chemistry under certain\r\nconditions. These results indicate that manufacturer-claimed HCHO\r\nremoval efficiencies may substantially overestimate real-world performance\r\nand that product use can introduce additional indoor air quality concerns,\r\nhighlighting the need for greater oversight and real-world testing\r\nof consumer air-cleaning products.</p>","PeriodicalId":100014,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T Air","volume":"3 7","pages":"1822–1831"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T Air","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestair.6c00046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Growing
public concern over indoor formaldehyde (HCHO) pollution
has driven rapid growth in the use of passive HCHO removal products,
which are widely marketed as low-cost and electricity-free solutions.
In China, monthly sales of such products have reached millions of
units. However, their real-world performance and unintended impacts
on indoor air chemistry remain insufficiently characterized. Here,
we evaluated the performance of five passive HCHO removal products
and their volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emissions in an unoccupied
office. None of the products measurably reduced HCHO concentrations
under realistic conditions. In contrast, substantial VOC emissions
were observed. A product claimed to be terpene-based emitted 192 μg
of VOCs per gram of product consumed, with emissions dominated by
aromatic compounds (50.5%), while a titanium dioxide (TiO2)-based product emitted 155 μg g–1 and was
enriched in monoterpenoids (54.7%). Hazardous VOC signals, such as
benzene, toluene, and styrene, were detected, and monoterpene emissions
may have implications for indoor secondary chemistry under certain
conditions. These results indicate that manufacturer-claimed HCHO
removal efficiencies may substantially overestimate real-world performance
and that product use can introduce additional indoor air quality concerns,
highlighting the need for greater oversight and real-world testing
of consumer air-cleaning products.