Improving dual-panel in-beam PET imaging for proton therapy monitoring using 3D U-Net.

IF 3.2
Medical physics Pub Date : 2026-08-01 DOI:10.1002/mp.70609
Dengyun Mu, Pengyuan Qi, Ao Qiu, Qi Liu, Qiuhui Ma, Peng Xiao, Lin Wan, Bingxuan Li, Jianchun Deng, Bensheng Qiu, Zhiyong Yang, Qingguo Xie
{"title":"Improving dual-panel in-beam PET imaging for proton therapy monitoring using 3D U-Net.","authors":"Dengyun Mu, Pengyuan Qi, Ao Qiu, Qi Liu, Qiuhui Ma, Peng Xiao, Lin Wan, Bingxuan Li, Jianchun Deng, Bensheng Qiu, Zhiyong Yang, Qingguo Xie","doi":"10.1002/mp.70609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In-beam positron emission tomography (PET) integrates dedicated detectors into proton therapy systems, enabling real-time acquisition of proton-induced positron-emitting activity. By pre-delivering a subset of single-energy proton spots as probes, in-beam PET has the potential to support online proton range verification and may inform subsequent spot delivery. However, the limited acquisition time and low yields of positron emitters result in noisy reconstructed images, and the open geometry of dual-panel PET further introduces stretching artifacts.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To address these issues, this study proposed a 3D U-Net-based post-processing method to enhance in-beam PET image quality and evaluated its feasibility through Monte Carlo simulations and preliminary experimental validation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirteen head computed tomography (CT) phantoms were irradiated with horizontally and vertically incident single-energy probes, representing two scenarios in which beams passed through relatively homogeneous and heterogeneous tissues. A phantom-level split was used, with seven CT phantoms for training, two for validation, and four held-out CT phantoms for testing. Proton probes in 3×3, 5×5, 7×7, and 9×9 spot patterns were simulated, with each spot delivering 2×10<sup>7</sup> protons. In-beam PET acquisition was performed for 30 s. Unfiltered reconstructed PET images were used as network inputs, and ground-truth activity distributions served as labels. Gaussian-filtered PET images served as the baseline for performance evaluation. Image quality was quantified by peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity index (SSIM), and proton range verification accuracy was evaluated by absolute range error (ARE). Additional simulations with CT density perturbations were conducted to evaluate sensitivity to proton range shifts. Preliminary experimental validation was performed using an all-digital PET prototype and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For horizontal beams, median PSNR values increased from 21.4-23.9 to 35.2-37.4, median SSIM values increased from 0.450-0.621 to 0.906-0.961, and median ARE values decreased from 1.05-1.18 mm to 0.52-0.73 mm. For vertical beams, median PSNR values improved from 21.9-23.2 to 29.2-34.1, median SSIM values improved from 0.480-0.560 to 0.745-0.895, and median ARE values decreased from 1.80-2.40 mm to 1.50-1.73 mm. The proposed method also demonstrated improved sensitivity to simulated range shifts and consistent improvements on experimental PET data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings demonstrate the preliminary feasibility of using 3D U-Net-based post-processing to enhance dual-panel in-beam PET image quality and improve PET-based proton range verification.</p>","PeriodicalId":94136,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":"53 8","pages":"e70609"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13430982/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.70609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In-beam positron emission tomography (PET) integrates dedicated detectors into proton therapy systems, enabling real-time acquisition of proton-induced positron-emitting activity. By pre-delivering a subset of single-energy proton spots as probes, in-beam PET has the potential to support online proton range verification and may inform subsequent spot delivery. However, the limited acquisition time and low yields of positron emitters result in noisy reconstructed images, and the open geometry of dual-panel PET further introduces stretching artifacts.

Purpose: To address these issues, this study proposed a 3D U-Net-based post-processing method to enhance in-beam PET image quality and evaluated its feasibility through Monte Carlo simulations and preliminary experimental validation.

Methods: Thirteen head computed tomography (CT) phantoms were irradiated with horizontally and vertically incident single-energy probes, representing two scenarios in which beams passed through relatively homogeneous and heterogeneous tissues. A phantom-level split was used, with seven CT phantoms for training, two for validation, and four held-out CT phantoms for testing. Proton probes in 3×3, 5×5, 7×7, and 9×9 spot patterns were simulated, with each spot delivering 2×107 protons. In-beam PET acquisition was performed for 30 s. Unfiltered reconstructed PET images were used as network inputs, and ground-truth activity distributions served as labels. Gaussian-filtered PET images served as the baseline for performance evaluation. Image quality was quantified by peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity index (SSIM), and proton range verification accuracy was evaluated by absolute range error (ARE). Additional simulations with CT density perturbations were conducted to evaluate sensitivity to proton range shifts. Preliminary experimental validation was performed using an all-digital PET prototype and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantoms.

Results: For horizontal beams, median PSNR values increased from 21.4-23.9 to 35.2-37.4, median SSIM values increased from 0.450-0.621 to 0.906-0.961, and median ARE values decreased from 1.05-1.18 mm to 0.52-0.73 mm. For vertical beams, median PSNR values improved from 21.9-23.2 to 29.2-34.1, median SSIM values improved from 0.480-0.560 to 0.745-0.895, and median ARE values decreased from 1.80-2.40 mm to 1.50-1.73 mm. The proposed method also demonstrated improved sensitivity to simulated range shifts and consistent improvements on experimental PET data.

Conclusion: These findings demonstrate the preliminary feasibility of using 3D U-Net-based post-processing to enhance dual-panel in-beam PET image quality and improve PET-based proton range verification.

改进双面板束内PET成像用于质子治疗监测的3D U-Net。
背景:束内正电子发射断层扫描(PET)将专用探测器集成到质子治疗系统中,能够实时获取质子诱导的正电子发射活动。通过预先递送一组单能量质子点作为探针,束内PET有可能支持在线质子范围验证,并可能为后续的点递送提供信息。然而,有限的采集时间和正电子发射体的低产量导致重建图像有噪声,并且双面板PET的开放几何结构进一步引入了拉伸伪影。为了解决这些问题,本研究提出了一种基于三维u - net的后处理方法来提高光束内PET图像质量,并通过蒙特卡罗模拟和初步实验验证来评估其可行性。方法:用水平和垂直入射单能量探针照射13个头部计算机断层扫描(CT)幻象,分别代表光束通过相对均匀和非均匀组织的两种情况。采用幻影水平分割,7个CT幻影用于训练,2个用于验证,4个伸出的CT幻影用于测试。模拟了3×3, 5×5, 7×7和9×9斑点模式的质子探针,每个斑点提供2×107个质子。束内PET采集时间为30 s。未过滤的重构PET图像作为网络输入,真实度活动分布作为标签。高斯滤波PET图像作为性能评估的基线。图像质量通过峰值信噪比(PSNR)和结构相似指数(SSIM)来量化,质子距离验证精度通过绝对距离误差(ARE)来评估。另外还进行了CT密度扰动的模拟,以评估对质子范围位移的敏感性。使用全数字PET原型和聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)模型进行初步实验验证。结果:水平梁的PSNR中位数从21.4 ~ 23.9增加到35.2 ~ 37.4,SSIM中位数从0.450 ~ 0.621增加到0.906 ~ 0.961,ARE中位数从1.05 ~ 1.18 mm减少到0.52 ~ 0.73 mm。垂直梁的PSNR中值从21.9 ~ 23.2提高到29.2 ~ 34.1,SSIM中值从0.480 ~ 0.560提高到0.745 ~ 0.895,ARE中值从1.80 ~ 2.40 mm降低到1.50 ~ 1.73 mm。该方法还证明了对模拟范围位移的灵敏度提高,并对实验PET数据进行了一致的改进。结论:这些研究结果初步证明了使用基于3D u - net的后处理技术来提高双面板束内PET图像质量和改进PET质子距离验证的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书