Libing Zhu, Yi Rong, Randa Tao, Yun Bai, Nathan Y Yu, Quan Chen
{"title":"Evaluation of AI-derived LAD artery dose metrics for survival stratification in stage III NSCLC: A secondary analysis of RTOG 0617 trial.","authors":"Libing Zhu, Yi Rong, Randa Tao, Yun Bai, Nathan Y Yu, Quan Chen","doi":"10.1002/mp.70621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While the radiation dose to left anterior descending (LAD) artery is associated with overall survival (OS) in NSCLC patients, manual segmentation is labor-intensive. Several auto-segmentation models were developed on average 4DCT with promising geometric agreement, yet their feasibility in clinical outcome analysis on lung CT remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates whether automated LAD segmentation can reproduce, at the group level, the established dose-survival association in a multi-institutional clinical trial dataset.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three deep learning-based auto-segmentation (DLAS) models for automatic segmentation of the LAD coronary artery were applied to 460 patients from the NRG Oncology/RTOG 0617 dataset. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) were calculated using each model's segmentation. The LAD V15 Gy was used to stratify patients into high-and low-risk groups, and the cut-off values were determined by minimizing mean absolute error (MAE) between DLAS-derived and manual OS curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three models demonstrated significantly different OS curves between the high risk and low risk groups (p < 0.05). The HR was 1.40 (95% CI: 1.02-1.93; p = 0.0381; MAE = 7.1%), 1.32 (95% CI: 1.03-1.68; p = 0.0258; MAE = 9.6%), and 1.37 (95% CI: 1.03-1.84; p = 0.0331; MAE = 7.9%) for the three models using a common V15 Gy ≥ 10% cut-off. After optimizing the cut-off, one model aligned well with what was derived from manual segmentation (MAE = 4.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among the evaluated models, one DL model showed the strongest performance of survival groups separation and achieved group-level overall survival stratification comparable to that previously reported using manual contours in the multi-institutional cohort. Further validation with paired manual contours and pre-specified cutoffs is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":94136,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":"53 8","pages":"e70621"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13431141/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.70621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: While the radiation dose to left anterior descending (LAD) artery is associated with overall survival (OS) in NSCLC patients, manual segmentation is labor-intensive. Several auto-segmentation models were developed on average 4DCT with promising geometric agreement, yet their feasibility in clinical outcome analysis on lung CT remains unclear.
Purpose: This study evaluates whether automated LAD segmentation can reproduce, at the group level, the established dose-survival association in a multi-institutional clinical trial dataset.
Methods: Three deep learning-based auto-segmentation (DLAS) models for automatic segmentation of the LAD coronary artery were applied to 460 patients from the NRG Oncology/RTOG 0617 dataset. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) were calculated using each model's segmentation. The LAD V15 Gy was used to stratify patients into high-and low-risk groups, and the cut-off values were determined by minimizing mean absolute error (MAE) between DLAS-derived and manual OS curves.
Results: All three models demonstrated significantly different OS curves between the high risk and low risk groups (p < 0.05). The HR was 1.40 (95% CI: 1.02-1.93; p = 0.0381; MAE = 7.1%), 1.32 (95% CI: 1.03-1.68; p = 0.0258; MAE = 9.6%), and 1.37 (95% CI: 1.03-1.84; p = 0.0331; MAE = 7.9%) for the three models using a common V15 Gy ≥ 10% cut-off. After optimizing the cut-off, one model aligned well with what was derived from manual segmentation (MAE = 4.3%).
Conclusion: Among the evaluated models, one DL model showed the strongest performance of survival groups separation and achieved group-level overall survival stratification comparable to that previously reported using manual contours in the multi-institutional cohort. Further validation with paired manual contours and pre-specified cutoffs is warranted.