Evaluation of AI-derived LAD artery dose metrics for survival stratification in stage III NSCLC: A secondary analysis of RTOG 0617 trial.

IF 3.2
Medical physics Pub Date : 2026-08-01 DOI:10.1002/mp.70621
Libing Zhu, Yi Rong, Randa Tao, Yun Bai, Nathan Y Yu, Quan Chen
{"title":"Evaluation of AI-derived LAD artery dose metrics for survival stratification in stage III NSCLC: A secondary analysis of RTOG 0617 trial.","authors":"Libing Zhu, Yi Rong, Randa Tao, Yun Bai, Nathan Y Yu, Quan Chen","doi":"10.1002/mp.70621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While the radiation dose to left anterior descending (LAD) artery is associated with overall survival (OS) in NSCLC patients, manual segmentation is labor-intensive. Several auto-segmentation models were developed on average 4DCT with promising geometric agreement, yet their feasibility in clinical outcome analysis on lung CT remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates whether automated LAD segmentation can reproduce, at the group level, the established dose-survival association in a multi-institutional clinical trial dataset.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three deep learning-based auto-segmentation (DLAS) models for automatic segmentation of the LAD coronary artery were applied to 460 patients from the NRG Oncology/RTOG 0617 dataset. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) were calculated using each model's segmentation. The LAD V15 Gy was used to stratify patients into high-and low-risk groups, and the cut-off values were determined by minimizing mean absolute error (MAE) between DLAS-derived and manual OS curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three models demonstrated significantly different OS curves between the high risk and low risk groups (p < 0.05). The HR was 1.40 (95% CI: 1.02-1.93; p = 0.0381; MAE = 7.1%), 1.32 (95% CI: 1.03-1.68; p = 0.0258; MAE = 9.6%), and 1.37 (95% CI: 1.03-1.84; p = 0.0331; MAE = 7.9%) for the three models using a common V15 Gy ≥ 10% cut-off. After optimizing the cut-off, one model aligned well with what was derived from manual segmentation (MAE = 4.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among the evaluated models, one DL model showed the strongest performance of survival groups separation and achieved group-level overall survival stratification comparable to that previously reported using manual contours in the multi-institutional cohort. Further validation with paired manual contours and pre-specified cutoffs is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":94136,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":"53 8","pages":"e70621"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13431141/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.70621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While the radiation dose to left anterior descending (LAD) artery is associated with overall survival (OS) in NSCLC patients, manual segmentation is labor-intensive. Several auto-segmentation models were developed on average 4DCT with promising geometric agreement, yet their feasibility in clinical outcome analysis on lung CT remains unclear.

Purpose: This study evaluates whether automated LAD segmentation can reproduce, at the group level, the established dose-survival association in a multi-institutional clinical trial dataset.

Methods: Three deep learning-based auto-segmentation (DLAS) models for automatic segmentation of the LAD coronary artery were applied to 460 patients from the NRG Oncology/RTOG 0617 dataset. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) were calculated using each model's segmentation. The LAD V15 Gy was used to stratify patients into high-and low-risk groups, and the cut-off values were determined by minimizing mean absolute error (MAE) between DLAS-derived and manual OS curves.

Results: All three models demonstrated significantly different OS curves between the high risk and low risk groups (p < 0.05). The HR was 1.40 (95% CI: 1.02-1.93; p = 0.0381; MAE = 7.1%), 1.32 (95% CI: 1.03-1.68; p = 0.0258; MAE = 9.6%), and 1.37 (95% CI: 1.03-1.84; p = 0.0331; MAE = 7.9%) for the three models using a common V15 Gy ≥ 10% cut-off. After optimizing the cut-off, one model aligned well with what was derived from manual segmentation (MAE = 4.3%).

Conclusion: Among the evaluated models, one DL model showed the strongest performance of survival groups separation and achieved group-level overall survival stratification comparable to that previously reported using manual contours in the multi-institutional cohort. Further validation with paired manual contours and pre-specified cutoffs is warranted.

评估ai衍生LAD动脉剂量指标对III期NSCLC生存分层的影响:RTOG 0617试验的二次分析
背景:虽然对NSCLC患者左前降支(LAD)的放射剂量与总生存率(OS)相关,但手工分割是一项劳动密集型的工作。在平均4DCT上建立了几种具有良好几何一致性的自动分割模型,但其在肺CT临床结果分析中的可行性尚不清楚。目的:本研究评估自动化LAD分割是否可以在组水平上再现多机构临床试验数据集中已建立的剂量-生存关联。方法:将3种基于深度学习的自动分割(DLAS)模型应用于NRG Oncology/RTOG 0617数据集的460例LAD冠状动脉自动分割。利用每个模型的分割计算Kaplan-Meier曲线和Cox比例风险比(HR)。使用LAD V15 Gy将患者分为高危组和低危组,并通过最小化dlas衍生曲线和手动OS曲线之间的平均绝对误差(MAE)来确定临界值。结果:所有三种模型在高风险和低风险组之间显示出显著不同的OS曲线(p)。结论:在评估的模型中,一种DL模型显示出最强的生存组分离性能,并实现了组水平的总体生存分层,可与先前在多机构队列中使用手动轮廓的报道相媲美。进一步验证配对的手动轮廓和预先指定的截止是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书