Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Behavioral Risk Assessment Scale for Work-Related Musculoskeletal Risk in Nurses (BRASM-N).

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Hariharasudhan Ravichandran, Amrutha Arumugam, Kshama Susheel Shetty
{"title":"Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Behavioral Risk Assessment Scale for Work-Related Musculoskeletal Risk in Nurses (BRASM-N).","authors":"Hariharasudhan Ravichandran, Amrutha Arumugam, Kshama Susheel Shetty","doi":"10.1002/nur.70118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among nurses arise from a complex interaction of physical, organizational, and psychosocial factors. Existing assessment tools often focus on isolated risk domains, limiting their applicability in comprehensive ergonomic risk evaluation. This study aimed to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Behavioral Risk Assessment Scale for Work-Related Musculoskeletal Risk in Nurses (BRASM-N). Instrument development followed a multistage process including item generation, expert content validation, pilot testing, and field testing. The scale was administered to 382 hospital nurses, with exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses conducted on independent subsamples. Reliability was examined using internal consistency and test-retest methods, and construct validity was assessed through convergent and discriminant validity. Content validation produced a 22-item scale with acceptable to excellent item relevance (I-CVI = 0.78-1.0). In 382 nurses, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a stable four-factor structure with good model fit (CFI = 0.94, TLI = 0.93, RMSEA = 0.049). Internal consistency was acceptable to excellent across subscales (Cronbach's α = 0.72-0.85; total α = 0.90). Test-retest reliability was strong (ICC = 0.76-0.91). Floor and ceiling effects were minimal. Convergent and discriminant validity were supported through correlations with work ability, job control, stress, and coping measures. The BRASM-N is a psychometrically robust, multidimensional instrument for assessing behavioral risk factors associated with work-related musculoskeletal risk in nurses and may support ergonomic screening and preventive interventions in occupational health settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":54492,"journal":{"name":"Research in Nursing & Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Nursing & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.70118","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among nurses arise from a complex interaction of physical, organizational, and psychosocial factors. Existing assessment tools often focus on isolated risk domains, limiting their applicability in comprehensive ergonomic risk evaluation. This study aimed to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Behavioral Risk Assessment Scale for Work-Related Musculoskeletal Risk in Nurses (BRASM-N). Instrument development followed a multistage process including item generation, expert content validation, pilot testing, and field testing. The scale was administered to 382 hospital nurses, with exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses conducted on independent subsamples. Reliability was examined using internal consistency and test-retest methods, and construct validity was assessed through convergent and discriminant validity. Content validation produced a 22-item scale with acceptable to excellent item relevance (I-CVI = 0.78-1.0). In 382 nurses, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a stable four-factor structure with good model fit (CFI = 0.94, TLI = 0.93, RMSEA = 0.049). Internal consistency was acceptable to excellent across subscales (Cronbach's α = 0.72-0.85; total α = 0.90). Test-retest reliability was strong (ICC = 0.76-0.91). Floor and ceiling effects were minimal. Convergent and discriminant validity were supported through correlations with work ability, job control, stress, and coping measures. The BRASM-N is a psychometrically robust, multidimensional instrument for assessing behavioral risk factors associated with work-related musculoskeletal risk in nurses and may support ergonomic screening and preventive interventions in occupational health settings.

护士工作相关肌肉骨骼风险行为风险评估量表(BRASM-N)的编制与心理测量学评价。
护士中与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病是由身体、组织和社会心理因素的复杂相互作用引起的。现有的评估工具往往侧重于孤立的风险领域,限制了其在全面的人体工程学风险评估中的适用性。本研究旨在开发和评估护士工作相关肌肉骨骼风险行为风险评估量表(BRASM-N)的心理测量特性。仪器开发遵循多个阶段的过程,包括项目生成、专家内容验证、试点测试和现场测试。对382名医院护士实施量表,对独立子样本进行探索性和验证性因素分析。信度采用内部一致性和重测法进行检验,结构效度采用收敛效度和判别效度进行评估。内容验证产生了一个22项的量表,具有可接受到优秀的项目相关性(I-CVI = 0.78-1.0)。在382名护士中,探索性和验证性因素分析支持稳定的四因素结构,模型拟合良好(CFI = 0.94, TLI = 0.93, RMSEA = 0.049)。各子量表的内部一致性可接受至优秀(Cronbach's α = 0.72-0.85;总α = 0.90)。重测信度较强(ICC = 0.76-0.91)。地板和天花板的影响很小。通过与工作能力、工作控制、压力和应对措施的相关性,支持收敛效度和区别效度。BRASM-N是一种心理测量学上可靠的多维工具,用于评估护士与工作相关的肌肉骨骼风险相关的行为风险因素,并可支持职业卫生机构的人体工程学筛查和预防性干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research in Nursing & Health ( RINAH ) is a peer-reviewed general research journal devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will inform the practice of nursing and other health disciplines. The editors invite reports of research describing problems and testing interventions related to health phenomena, health care and self-care, clinical organization and administration; and the testing of research findings in practice. Research protocols are considered if funded in a peer-reviewed process by an agency external to the authors’ home institution and if the work is in progress. Papers on research methods and techniques are appropriate if they go beyond what is already generally available in the literature and include description of successful use of the method. Theory papers are accepted if each proposition is supported by research evidence. Systematic reviews of the literature are reviewed if PRISMA guidelines are followed. Letters to the editor commenting on published articles are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书