Treatment gaps in osteoporosis care following recurrent fractures: a nationwide cohort study.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Hyun Jin Han, Miryoung Kim, Eyoung Wang, Min Ji Kim, Hae Sun Suh
{"title":"Treatment gaps in osteoporosis care following recurrent fractures: a nationwide cohort study.","authors":"Hyun Jin Han, Miryoung Kim, Eyoung Wang, Min Ji Kim, Hae Sun Suh","doi":"10.57264/cer-2026-0039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> This nationwide cohort study primarily aimed to descriptively characterize real-world treatment patterns, including treatment initiation, adherence, treatment duration and discontinuation of the first treatment drug, among patients who experienced a recurrent osteoporotic fracture. <b>Materials & methods:</b> This population-based, retrospective cohort study used data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Database of South Korea. It included male and female patients aged 55 years and older who experienced a recurrent osteoporotic fracture within 2 years of their index fracture in 2013. <b>Results:</b> The study period was from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2021, with an outcome assessment period from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2017. A total of 34,558 patients with recurrent osteoporotic fractures were observed, and just over half (n = 18,462, 53.4%) received osteoporosis medication, with a significant difference in medication rates between males (23.7%) and females (58.8%) (p < 0.001). The estimated median duration of osteoporosis medication was 146 days (interquartile range: 61-365 days). The discontinuation rate of medication within 2 years of follow-up after their recurrent fracture was 80.5%, with the highest discontinuation rate (90.4%) observed among patients taking daily oral bisphosphonate medication. <b>Conclusion:</b> Although patients with recurrent fractures require intensive management, our results showed a significant unmet need in the initiation and persistence of osteoporosis medication. Therefore, it is crucial to establish a strategic treatment approach to address the treatment gap in managing osteoporosis among very high-risk patients. <b>Dataset name:</b> Health Insurance Review and Assessment Database of South Korea.</p>","PeriodicalId":15539,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","volume":" ","pages":"e260039"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2026-0039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This nationwide cohort study primarily aimed to descriptively characterize real-world treatment patterns, including treatment initiation, adherence, treatment duration and discontinuation of the first treatment drug, among patients who experienced a recurrent osteoporotic fracture. Materials & methods: This population-based, retrospective cohort study used data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Database of South Korea. It included male and female patients aged 55 years and older who experienced a recurrent osteoporotic fracture within 2 years of their index fracture in 2013. Results: The study period was from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2021, with an outcome assessment period from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2017. A total of 34,558 patients with recurrent osteoporotic fractures were observed, and just over half (n = 18,462, 53.4%) received osteoporosis medication, with a significant difference in medication rates between males (23.7%) and females (58.8%) (p < 0.001). The estimated median duration of osteoporosis medication was 146 days (interquartile range: 61-365 days). The discontinuation rate of medication within 2 years of follow-up after their recurrent fracture was 80.5%, with the highest discontinuation rate (90.4%) observed among patients taking daily oral bisphosphonate medication. Conclusion: Although patients with recurrent fractures require intensive management, our results showed a significant unmet need in the initiation and persistence of osteoporosis medication. Therefore, it is crucial to establish a strategic treatment approach to address the treatment gap in managing osteoporosis among very high-risk patients. Dataset name: Health Insurance Review and Assessment Database of South Korea.

复发性骨折后骨质疏松症治疗缺口:一项全国性队列研究。
目的:这项全国性队列研究的主要目的是描述性地描述现实世界的治疗模式,包括复发性骨质疏松性骨折患者的治疗开始、依从性、治疗持续时间和第一种治疗药物的停药。材料和方法:这项基于人群的回顾性队列研究使用了来自韩国健康保险审查和评估数据库的数据。该研究包括年龄在55岁及以上的男性和女性患者,这些患者在2013年指数骨折后2年内复发过骨质疏松性骨折。结果:研究期为2012年1月1日至2021年12月31日,结果评估期为2013年1月1日至2017年12月31日。共观察到34558例复发性骨质疏松性骨折患者,其中一半以上(n = 18462, 53.4%)接受了骨质疏松药物治疗,其中男性(23.7%)与女性(58.8%)的药物治疗率差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。估计骨质疏松药物治疗的中位持续时间为146天(四分位数范围:61-365天)。复发性骨折后随访2年内停药率为80.5%,其中每日口服双膦酸盐药物停药率最高(90.4%)。结论:虽然复发性骨折患者需要强化治疗,但我们的研究结果显示,在骨质疏松药物的开始和持续治疗方面,仍有很大的需求未得到满足。因此,建立一种战略性的治疗方法来解决高危骨质疏松症患者的治疗差距是至关重要的。数据集名称:韩国健康保险审查和评估数据库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of comparative effectiveness research
Journal of comparative effectiveness research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research provides a rapid-publication platform for debate, and for the presentation of new findings and research methodologies. Through rigorous evaluation and comprehensive coverage, the Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research provides stakeholders (including patients, clinicians, healthcare purchasers, and health policy makers) with the key data and opinions to make informed and specific decisions on clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书