Core-periphery dynamics in market-conditioned financial networks: A conditional p-threshold mutual information approach.

IF 3.3 2区 数学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, APPLIED
Chaos Pub Date : 2026-08-01 DOI:10.1063/5.0320572
Kundan Mukhia, Imran Ansari, Salam Rabindrajit Luwang, Md Nurujjaman
{"title":"Core-periphery dynamics in market-conditioned financial networks: A conditional p-threshold mutual information approach.","authors":"Kundan Mukhia, Imran Ansari, Salam Rabindrajit Luwang, Md Nurujjaman","doi":"10.1063/5.0320572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates how financial market structure reorganizes during the COVID-19 crash using a conditional p-threshold mutual information (MI) based Minimum Spanning Tree (MST) network framework. We analyze nonlinear dependencies among the largest stocks from four economically diverse QUAD countries: the United States, Japan, Australia, and India. The crash period is identified using the Hellinger distance and further characterized by the Hilbert spectrum. A crash is defined when the Hellinger distance exceeds the threshold, enabling the segmentation of the data into pre-crash, crash, and post-crash periods. To isolate direct stock-level dependencies, the conditional p-threshold MI approach filters out common market effects and applies permutation-based significance testing. The resulting statistically validated dependencies are used to construct MST networks, allowing consistent comparison across market periods. The network analysis reveals common crisis-related dynamics across all markets. During the crash, networks become more integrated, with shorter path lengths and higher centrality, while algebraic connectivity declines, indicating increased structural fragility. A clear reorganization of the core-periphery structure is observed, with declining core concentration and increasing periphery fragility, supported by disassortative mixing that facilitates shock transmission. In the post-crash period, network topology shows partial and non-uniform recovery, suggesting persistent structural effects. This interpretation is further supported by an aftershock analysis based on the Gutenberg-Richter law, which indicates a higher relative frequency of large volatility events following the crash. The consistency of these findings across all four markets highlights the effectiveness of the conditional p-threshold MI framework for capturing nonlinear interdependencies and systemic vulnerability in financial markets.</p>","PeriodicalId":9974,"journal":{"name":"Chaos","volume":"36 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chaos","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0320572","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates how financial market structure reorganizes during the COVID-19 crash using a conditional p-threshold mutual information (MI) based Minimum Spanning Tree (MST) network framework. We analyze nonlinear dependencies among the largest stocks from four economically diverse QUAD countries: the United States, Japan, Australia, and India. The crash period is identified using the Hellinger distance and further characterized by the Hilbert spectrum. A crash is defined when the Hellinger distance exceeds the threshold, enabling the segmentation of the data into pre-crash, crash, and post-crash periods. To isolate direct stock-level dependencies, the conditional p-threshold MI approach filters out common market effects and applies permutation-based significance testing. The resulting statistically validated dependencies are used to construct MST networks, allowing consistent comparison across market periods. The network analysis reveals common crisis-related dynamics across all markets. During the crash, networks become more integrated, with shorter path lengths and higher centrality, while algebraic connectivity declines, indicating increased structural fragility. A clear reorganization of the core-periphery structure is observed, with declining core concentration and increasing periphery fragility, supported by disassortative mixing that facilitates shock transmission. In the post-crash period, network topology shows partial and non-uniform recovery, suggesting persistent structural effects. This interpretation is further supported by an aftershock analysis based on the Gutenberg-Richter law, which indicates a higher relative frequency of large volatility events following the crash. The consistency of these findings across all four markets highlights the effectiveness of the conditional p-threshold MI framework for capturing nonlinear interdependencies and systemic vulnerability in financial markets.

市场条件下金融网络的核心-外围动态:条件p阈值互信息方法。
本研究使用基于条件p阈值互信息(MI)的最小生成树(MST)网络框架,研究了金融市场结构在COVID-19崩溃期间的重组。我们分析了四个经济多样化的四国(美国、日本、澳大利亚和印度)最大股票之间的非线性依赖关系。撞击期由海灵格距离确定,并由希尔伯特光谱进一步表征。当Hellinger距离超过阈值时定义崩溃,从而允许将数据分割为崩溃前、崩溃和崩溃后的时间段。为了分离直接的股票水平依赖性,条件p阈值MI方法过滤掉常见的市场效应,并应用基于排列的显著性检验。结果统计验证的依赖关系用于构建MST网络,允许跨市场时期的一致比较。网络分析揭示了所有市场中与危机相关的共同动态。在崩溃期间,网络变得更加整合,路径长度更短,中心性更高,而代数连通性下降,表明结构脆弱性增加。观察到核心-外围结构的明显重组,核心集中度下降,外围脆弱性增加,由促进冲击传递的非分类混合支持。在崩溃后的时期,网络拓扑表现出部分和不均匀的恢复,表明持续的结构效应。基于古腾堡-里希特定律的余震分析进一步支持了这一解释,该分析表明,在崩盘之后,大波动事件的相对频率更高。这些发现在所有四个市场中的一致性突出了条件p阈值MI框架在捕捉金融市场非线性相互依赖性和系统性脆弱性方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chaos
Chaos 物理-物理:数学物理
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
13.80%
发文量
448
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to increasing the understanding of nonlinear phenomena and describing the manifestations in a manner comprehensible to researchers from a broad spectrum of disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书