Growing chasms: Australian psychiatrist workforce distribution across local government areas by socioeconomic status.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Luke Sy-Cherng Woon, Stephen Allison, Tarun Bastiampillai, Steve Kisely, Wai-Man Liu, Jeffrey C L Looi
{"title":"Growing chasms: Australian psychiatrist workforce distribution across local government areas by socioeconomic status.","authors":"Luke Sy-Cherng Woon, Stephen Allison, Tarun Bastiampillai, Steve Kisely, Wai-Man Liu, Jeffrey C L Looi","doi":"10.1177/00048674261471314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Local socioeconomic status may influence psychiatrist distribution, yet this remains systematically unexamined in Australia. We aimed to assess how psychiatrist availability varies across regions with differing socioeconomic advantage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Psychiatrist workforce data from the Health Workforce Data Tool (2013-2023) were linked to local government areas-level quintiles of the Index of Relative Socioeconomic Advantage and Disadvantage. We calculated and compared the proportion of local government areas with psychiatrists, psychiatrist counts per local government area, and psychiatrists per 10,000 population by Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas quintile. Panel regression analyses examined per capita variations, adjusting for state/territory and year effects in the same analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Outer regional/remote/very remote areas had relatively low access to psychiatrists compared to metropolitan/inner regional areas. Disparities widened over time between the highest socioeconomic status quintile and all others. The average psychiatrist count per 10,000 population for top-quintile local government areas was 2.8 (standard deviation: ±4.8; from 0.6 (standard deviation: ±1.0, Northern Territory) to 5.5 (standard deviation: ±7.0, South Australia)), compared with 0.2-0.5 per 10,000 population for all lower socioeconomic status quintiles. In panel regression with interaction between Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas and remoteness, psychiatrist counts (adjusted for state/territory and year) in non-top-quintile local government areas were 2.6 (95% confidence interval: -4.1 to -1.1) to 3.0 (95% confidence interval: -4.4- to -1.7) per 10,000 population lower than top-quintile metropolitan and inner regional local government areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Psychiatrists are densely concentrated in high socioeconomic status and metropolitan/inner regional areas. Lower socioeconomic status local government areas shared similar, limited psychiatrist distributions. Targeted strategies are required to improve the equitable distribution of mental health resources across socioeconomic gradients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8589,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"48674261471314"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674261471314","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Local socioeconomic status may influence psychiatrist distribution, yet this remains systematically unexamined in Australia. We aimed to assess how psychiatrist availability varies across regions with differing socioeconomic advantage.

Methods: Psychiatrist workforce data from the Health Workforce Data Tool (2013-2023) were linked to local government areas-level quintiles of the Index of Relative Socioeconomic Advantage and Disadvantage. We calculated and compared the proportion of local government areas with psychiatrists, psychiatrist counts per local government area, and psychiatrists per 10,000 population by Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas quintile. Panel regression analyses examined per capita variations, adjusting for state/territory and year effects in the same analyses.

Results: Outer regional/remote/very remote areas had relatively low access to psychiatrists compared to metropolitan/inner regional areas. Disparities widened over time between the highest socioeconomic status quintile and all others. The average psychiatrist count per 10,000 population for top-quintile local government areas was 2.8 (standard deviation: ±4.8; from 0.6 (standard deviation: ±1.0, Northern Territory) to 5.5 (standard deviation: ±7.0, South Australia)), compared with 0.2-0.5 per 10,000 population for all lower socioeconomic status quintiles. In panel regression with interaction between Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas and remoteness, psychiatrist counts (adjusted for state/territory and year) in non-top-quintile local government areas were 2.6 (95% confidence interval: -4.1 to -1.1) to 3.0 (95% confidence interval: -4.4- to -1.7) per 10,000 population lower than top-quintile metropolitan and inner regional local government areas.

Conclusions: Psychiatrists are densely concentrated in high socioeconomic status and metropolitan/inner regional areas. Lower socioeconomic status local government areas shared similar, limited psychiatrist distributions. Targeted strategies are required to improve the equitable distribution of mental health resources across socioeconomic gradients.

日益加深的鸿沟:澳大利亚精神科医生的劳动力分布在地方政府区域的社会经济地位。
目的:当地社会经济地位可能会影响精神病医生的分布,但这在澳大利亚仍然没有系统地进行研究。我们的目的是评估精神科医生的可用性在不同社会经济优势地区的差异。方法:将来自卫生人力数据工具(2013-2023)的精神科医生劳动力数据与地方政府区域一级相对社会经济优势和劣势指数的五分位数相关联。按照地区五分位数的社会经济指数,计算并比较了地方政府辖区拥有精神科医生的比例、地方政府辖区拥有精神科医生的人数、每万人口拥有精神科医生的人数。面板回归分析检查了人均变化,在同一分析中调整了州/地区和年份的影响。结果:外围地区/偏远地区/非常偏远地区与大都市/内陆地区相比,获得精神科医生的机会相对较低。随着时间的推移,社会经济地位最高的五分之一与其他五分之一之间的差距越来越大。在前五分之一的地方政府地区,每万人口中平均有2.8名精神科医生(标准差:±4.8;从0.6名(标准差:±1.0,北领地)到5.5名(标准差:±7.0,南澳大利亚)),而在所有社会经济地位较低的五分之一地区,每万人口中有0.2-0.5名精神科医生。在地区社会经济指数与偏远程度之间相互作用的面板回归中,非五分之一的地方政府地区的精神病医生计数(根据州/地区和年份进行调整)为每10,000人口2.6(95%置信区间:-4.1至-1.1)至3.0(95%置信区间:-4.4至-1.7),低于五分之一的大都市和内区域地方政府地区。结论:精神科医生集中分布在高社会经济地位和大都市/内陆地区。社会经济地位较低的地方政府区域也有类似的,有限的精神病医生分布。需要有针对性的战略来改善精神卫生资源在社会经济梯度中的公平分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
149
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is the official Journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP). The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is a monthly journal publishing original articles which describe research or report opinions of interest to psychiatrists. These contributions may be presented as original research, reviews, perspectives, commentaries and letters to the editor. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is the leading psychiatry journal of the Asia-Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书