Machine Learning - Powered Assessment of Plain Radiographs for Detecting Bony Bankart Lesions and Guiding CT Decision-Making.

Q3 Medicine
Suthee Tharakulphan, Chayanin Angthong, Pawin Rattanasumrit
{"title":"Machine Learning - Powered Assessment of Plain Radiographs for Detecting Bony Bankart Lesions and Guiding CT Decision-Making.","authors":"Suthee Tharakulphan, Chayanin Angthong, Pawin Rattanasumrit","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0055.8580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background. To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of plain radiography in detecting bony Bankart lesions compared to computed tomography (CT) and to identify clinical factors that delineate the necessity for CT investigation using machine learning-powered analysis.\nMaterial and methods. A retrospective analysis of 69 cases of traumatic anterior glenohumeral dislocation was performed. Two blinded observers evaluated plain radiographs for bony Bankart lesions. Inter-observer reliability was assessed using Cohen’s kappa (κ). Diagnostic metrics (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV) were calculated using CT as the gold standard. Multivariate logistic regression and machine learning (decision tree) models were utilized to identify predictors for ‘hidden’ lesions (X-ray negative, CT positive).\nResults. Inter-observer agreement for X-ray was fair (κ = 0.272). Observer 1 demonstrated 100% specificity but low sensitivity (27.27%). Multivariate analysis identified ‘Time from first dislocation’ as a significant predictor for CT-detected lesions (p = 0.019). ROC and machine learning models identified a critical cut-off of 36–42 weeks; patients presenting within this window had a 55.6-70% probability of a hidden lesion, compared to 16.7% for chronic cases.\nConclusions. 1. Conventional radiographs demonstrated high specificity but limited sensitivity and only fair in­terobserver reliability for detecting bony Bankart lesions compared with CT. 2. A negative radiographic result does not reliably exclude a bony Bankart lesion in patients with traumatic anterior shoulder instability. 3. CT examination should be performed in patients presenting within 42 weeks after their first anterior shoulder dislocation, particularly when radiographs are negative but clinical suspicion persists. 4. CT should also be strongly considered in patients with recurrent instability, especially those with ≥3 dislocation episodes, to facilitate early identification of occult osseous pathology and guide appropriate surgical planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":19622,"journal":{"name":"Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja","volume":"28 2","pages":"83-89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0055.8580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of plain radiography in detecting bony Bankart lesions compared to computed tomography (CT) and to identify clinical factors that delineate the necessity for CT investigation using machine learning-powered analysis. Material and methods. A retrospective analysis of 69 cases of traumatic anterior glenohumeral dislocation was performed. Two blinded observers evaluated plain radiographs for bony Bankart lesions. Inter-observer reliability was assessed using Cohen’s kappa (κ). Diagnostic metrics (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV) were calculated using CT as the gold standard. Multivariate logistic regression and machine learning (decision tree) models were utilized to identify predictors for ‘hidden’ lesions (X-ray negative, CT positive). Results. Inter-observer agreement for X-ray was fair (κ = 0.272). Observer 1 demonstrated 100% specificity but low sensitivity (27.27%). Multivariate analysis identified ‘Time from first dislocation’ as a significant predictor for CT-detected lesions (p = 0.019). ROC and machine learning models identified a critical cut-off of 36–42 weeks; patients presenting within this window had a 55.6-70% probability of a hidden lesion, compared to 16.7% for chronic cases. Conclusions. 1. Conventional radiographs demonstrated high specificity but limited sensitivity and only fair in­terobserver reliability for detecting bony Bankart lesions compared with CT. 2. A negative radiographic result does not reliably exclude a bony Bankart lesion in patients with traumatic anterior shoulder instability. 3. CT examination should be performed in patients presenting within 42 weeks after their first anterior shoulder dislocation, particularly when radiographs are negative but clinical suspicion persists. 4. CT should also be strongly considered in patients with recurrent instability, especially those with ≥3 dislocation episodes, to facilitate early identification of occult osseous pathology and guide appropriate surgical planning.

机器学习驱动的x线平片评估用于检测骨银行病变和指导CT决策。
& lt; p>背景。与计算机断层扫描(CT)相比,评估x线平片在检测骨班卡特病变方面的诊断准确性,并确定临床因素,这些因素描述了使用机器学习驱动分析进行CT检查的必要性。对69例外伤性盂肱前脱位进行回顾性分析。两名盲法观察者评估骨班卡特病变的x线平片。采用Cohen’s kappa (κ)评价观察者间信度。以CT为金标准计算诊断指标(敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV)。使用多元逻辑回归和机器学习(决策树)模型来识别“隐藏”病变(x线阴性,CT阳性)的预测因子。x射线的观察者间一致性尚可(κ = 0.272)。观察者1的特异性为100%,但敏感性较低(27.27%)。多变量分析发现,“首次脱位的时间”是ct检测病变的重要预测因子(p = 0.019)。ROC和机器学习模型确定了36-42周的临界截止时间;在此窗口内出现的患者隐匿病变的概率为55.6-70%,而慢性病例为16.7%。1. 与CT相比,常规x线片在检测骨Bankart病变方面具有高特异性,但灵敏度有限,观察者间的可靠性也很公平。2. 在外伤性前肩不稳患者中,阴性的x线片结果不能可靠地排除骨Bankart病变。3. 首次肩关节前脱位后42周内出现的患者应进行CT检查,特别是当x线片阴性但临床怀疑仍然存在时。4. 对于复发性不稳定的患者,特别是脱位≥3次的患者,也应强烈考虑CT检查,以促进早期发现隐性骨病理,指导适当的手术计划。 </p>。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja
Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书