Effects of Nitrogen and Irrigation Treatments on Grain Yield, Quality, and Grain Yield Components of Teff Plants

IF 3.3 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science Pub Date : 2026-08-03 Epub Date: 2026-04-05 DOI:10.1002/jpln.70071
Mevlut Akcura, Beyza Ciftci, Irem Poyraz, Ismail Tas, Mahmut Kaplan
{"title":"Effects of Nitrogen and Irrigation Treatments on Grain Yield, Quality, and Grain Yield Components of Teff Plants","authors":"Mevlut Akcura,&nbsp;Beyza Ciftci,&nbsp;Irem Poyraz,&nbsp;Ismail Tas,&nbsp;Mahmut Kaplan","doi":"10.1002/jpln.70071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p><b>Background</b>: Irrigation and nitrogen are the main inputs for crop yield and grain quality.</p>\n <p><b>Aim</b>: Although studies have been conducted on these applications across different plants, none have focused on yield and grain quality in teff.</p>\n <p><b>Methods</b>: This study was conducted to determine the effects of four different nitrogen doses (0, 30, 60, and 90 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) and three different irrigation levels (50%, 75%, and 100% of ETo value calculated with the use of evaporations from Class-A pan) on grain yield, yield components, and grain quality traits (protein, starch profile, fatty acid composition) of teff (<i>Eragrostis tef</i> (Zucc.) Trotter). A key teff cultivar with brown grains was used as the plant material. Experiments were conducted in a split-plot design with four replications over 2 years. Irrigation, nitrogen, years, and irrigation × nitrogen interactions were found to be significant for all parameters investigated (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01).</p>\n <p><b>Results</b>: Over 2 years, irrigation water requirements ranged from 340 mm in the I<sub>50</sub> × N<sub>0</sub> treatment to 603 mm in the I<sub>100</sub> × N<sub>90</sub> treatment. The highest irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE; 0.69 kg m<sup>−3</sup>) was observed in the I<sub>50</sub> × N<sub>60</sub> treatment, while the lowest (0.31 kg m<sup>−3</sup>) was observed in the I<sub>100</sub> × N<sub>0</sub> treatment. Similarly, crop water productivity (CWP) ranged from 0.29 kg m<sup>−3</sup> (I<sub>100</sub> × N<sub>0</sub>) to 0.52 kg m<sup>−3</sup> (I<sub>75</sub> × N<sub>60</sub>). For grain yield and components, the greatest grain yield was obtained from I<sub>75</sub> × N<sub>60</sub> treatments (2.52 t ha<sup>−1</sup>), the greatest biological yield was obtained from I<sub>100</sub> × N<sub>90</sub> treatments (6.83 t ha<sup>−1</sup>), the greatest harvest index was obtained from I<sub>50</sub> × N<sub>60</sub> treatments (26.01%), and the greatest thousand grain weight was obtained from I<sub>75</sub> × N<sub>60</sub> treatments (29.39 mg). Increased irrigation levels reduced crude protein content but increased crude ash and phytic acid, causing variations in resistant and total starch. Higher nitrogen doses raised crude protein, crude ash, and resistant starch while reducing phytic acid and amylopectin. The N<sub>90</sub> dose provided the highest resistant starch, and the I<sub>50</sub> × N<sub>90</sub> combination yielded the highest amylose content. Irrigation and nitrogen significantly impacted starch and amylose ratios.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion</b>: For optimal grain yield, biological yield, and quality, the I<sub>75</sub> × N<sub>60</sub> combination is recommended, as it enhances resistant starch, biological yield, and thousand-grain weight while maintaining balance in plant height and total starch content.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16802,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science","volume":"189 4","pages":"518-529"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jpln.70071","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Irrigation and nitrogen are the main inputs for crop yield and grain quality.

Aim: Although studies have been conducted on these applications across different plants, none have focused on yield and grain quality in teff.

Methods: This study was conducted to determine the effects of four different nitrogen doses (0, 30, 60, and 90 kg ha−1) and three different irrigation levels (50%, 75%, and 100% of ETo value calculated with the use of evaporations from Class-A pan) on grain yield, yield components, and grain quality traits (protein, starch profile, fatty acid composition) of teff (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter). A key teff cultivar with brown grains was used as the plant material. Experiments were conducted in a split-plot design with four replications over 2 years. Irrigation, nitrogen, years, and irrigation × nitrogen interactions were found to be significant for all parameters investigated (p < 0.01).

Results: Over 2 years, irrigation water requirements ranged from 340 mm in the I50 × N0 treatment to 603 mm in the I100 × N90 treatment. The highest irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE; 0.69 kg m−3) was observed in the I50 × N60 treatment, while the lowest (0.31 kg m−3) was observed in the I100 × N0 treatment. Similarly, crop water productivity (CWP) ranged from 0.29 kg m−3 (I100 × N0) to 0.52 kg m−3 (I75 × N60). For grain yield and components, the greatest grain yield was obtained from I75 × N60 treatments (2.52 t ha−1), the greatest biological yield was obtained from I100 × N90 treatments (6.83 t ha−1), the greatest harvest index was obtained from I50 × N60 treatments (26.01%), and the greatest thousand grain weight was obtained from I75 × N60 treatments (29.39 mg). Increased irrigation levels reduced crude protein content but increased crude ash and phytic acid, causing variations in resistant and total starch. Higher nitrogen doses raised crude protein, crude ash, and resistant starch while reducing phytic acid and amylopectin. The N90 dose provided the highest resistant starch, and the I50 × N90 combination yielded the highest amylose content. Irrigation and nitrogen significantly impacted starch and amylose ratios.

Conclusion: For optimal grain yield, biological yield, and quality, the I75 × N60 combination is recommended, as it enhances resistant starch, biological yield, and thousand-grain weight while maintaining balance in plant height and total starch content.

氮肥和灌溉处理对苔麸产量、品质及产量组成的影响
背景:灌溉和氮肥是作物产量和粮食品质的主要投入。目的:虽然已经对不同植物的这些应用进行了研究,但没有一个研究集中在苔麸的产量和籽粒质量上。方法:研究4种不同施氮量(0、30、60和90 kg ha−1)和3种不同灌溉水平(利用a类蒸发量计算ETo值的50%、75%和100%)对teff (Eragrostis tef (Zucc))籽粒产量、产量组成和籽粒品质性状(蛋白质、淀粉谱、脂肪酸组成)的影响。Trotter)。以一个褐色籽粒的苔麸关键品种为材料。实验采用裂区设计,2年4次重复。灌溉、氮素、年份和灌溉与氮素的相互作用在所有研究参数中都是显著的(p < 0.01)。结果:2年内,灌溉需水量从I50 × N0处理的340 mm到I100 × N90处理的603 mm不等。I50 × N60处理灌溉水利用效率最高(0.69 kg m−3),I100 × N0处理灌溉水利用效率最低(0.31 kg m−3)。同样,作物水分生产力(CWP)范围为0.29 kg m−3 (I100 × N0)至0.52 kg m−3 (I75 × N60)。在产量和组成方面,I75 × N60处理的产量最高(2.52 t ha−1),I100 × N90处理的生物产量最高(6.83 t ha−1),I50 × N60处理的收获指数最高(26.01%),I75 × N60处理的千粒重最高(29.39 mg)。灌水水平的提高降低了粗蛋白质含量,但增加了粗灰分和植酸含量,导致抗性和总淀粉含量的变化。较高的氮剂量提高了粗蛋白质、粗灰分和抗性淀粉,同时降低了植酸和支链淀粉。N90剂量产生的抗性淀粉最高,I50 × N90组合产生的直链淀粉含量最高。灌溉和施氮显著影响淀粉和直链淀粉的比例。结论:I75 × N60组合可提高抗性淀粉、生物产量和千粒重,同时保持株高和总淀粉含量的平衡,以获得最佳的籽粒产量、生物产量和品质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1922, the Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science (JPNSS) is an international peer-reviewed journal devoted to cover the entire spectrum of plant nutrition and soil science from different scale units, e.g. agroecosystem to natural systems. With its wide scope and focus on soil-plant interactions, JPNSS is one of the leading journals on this topic. Articles in JPNSS include reviews, high-standard original papers, and short communications and represent challenging research of international significance. The Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science is one of the world’s oldest journals. You can trust in a peer-reviewed journal that has been established in the plant and soil science community for almost 100 years. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science (ISSN 1436-8730) is published in six volumes per year, by the German Societies of Plant Nutrition (DGP) and Soil Science (DBG). Furthermore, the Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science (JPNSS) is a Cooperating Journal of the International Union of Soil Science (IUSS). The journal is produced by Wiley-VCH. Topical Divisions of the Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science that are receiving increasing attention are: JPNSS – Topical Divisions Special timely focus in interdisciplinarity: - sustainability & critical zone science. Soil-Plant Interactions: - rhizosphere science & soil ecology - pollutant cycling & plant-soil protection - land use & climate change. Soil Science: - soil chemistry & soil physics - soil biology & biogeochemistry - soil genesis & mineralogy. Plant Nutrition: - plant nutritional physiology - nutrient dynamics & soil fertility - ecophysiological aspects of plant nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书