Mevlut Akcura, Beyza Ciftci, Irem Poyraz, Ismail Tas, Mahmut Kaplan
{"title":"Effects of Nitrogen and Irrigation Treatments on Grain Yield, Quality, and Grain Yield Components of Teff Plants","authors":"Mevlut Akcura, Beyza Ciftci, Irem Poyraz, Ismail Tas, Mahmut Kaplan","doi":"10.1002/jpln.70071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p><b>Background</b>: Irrigation and nitrogen are the main inputs for crop yield and grain quality.</p>\n <p><b>Aim</b>: Although studies have been conducted on these applications across different plants, none have focused on yield and grain quality in teff.</p>\n <p><b>Methods</b>: This study was conducted to determine the effects of four different nitrogen doses (0, 30, 60, and 90 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) and three different irrigation levels (50%, 75%, and 100% of ETo value calculated with the use of evaporations from Class-A pan) on grain yield, yield components, and grain quality traits (protein, starch profile, fatty acid composition) of teff (<i>Eragrostis tef</i> (Zucc.) Trotter). A key teff cultivar with brown grains was used as the plant material. Experiments were conducted in a split-plot design with four replications over 2 years. Irrigation, nitrogen, years, and irrigation × nitrogen interactions were found to be significant for all parameters investigated (<i>p</i> < 0.01).</p>\n <p><b>Results</b>: Over 2 years, irrigation water requirements ranged from 340 mm in the I<sub>50</sub> × N<sub>0</sub> treatment to 603 mm in the I<sub>100</sub> × N<sub>90</sub> treatment. The highest irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE; 0.69 kg m<sup>−3</sup>) was observed in the I<sub>50</sub> × N<sub>60</sub> treatment, while the lowest (0.31 kg m<sup>−3</sup>) was observed in the I<sub>100</sub> × N<sub>0</sub> treatment. Similarly, crop water productivity (CWP) ranged from 0.29 kg m<sup>−3</sup> (I<sub>100</sub> × N<sub>0</sub>) to 0.52 kg m<sup>−3</sup> (I<sub>75</sub> × N<sub>60</sub>). For grain yield and components, the greatest grain yield was obtained from I<sub>75</sub> × N<sub>60</sub> treatments (2.52 t ha<sup>−1</sup>), the greatest biological yield was obtained from I<sub>100</sub> × N<sub>90</sub> treatments (6.83 t ha<sup>−1</sup>), the greatest harvest index was obtained from I<sub>50</sub> × N<sub>60</sub> treatments (26.01%), and the greatest thousand grain weight was obtained from I<sub>75</sub> × N<sub>60</sub> treatments (29.39 mg). Increased irrigation levels reduced crude protein content but increased crude ash and phytic acid, causing variations in resistant and total starch. Higher nitrogen doses raised crude protein, crude ash, and resistant starch while reducing phytic acid and amylopectin. The N<sub>90</sub> dose provided the highest resistant starch, and the I<sub>50</sub> × N<sub>90</sub> combination yielded the highest amylose content. Irrigation and nitrogen significantly impacted starch and amylose ratios.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion</b>: For optimal grain yield, biological yield, and quality, the I<sub>75</sub> × N<sub>60</sub> combination is recommended, as it enhances resistant starch, biological yield, and thousand-grain weight while maintaining balance in plant height and total starch content.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16802,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science","volume":"189 4","pages":"518-529"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jpln.70071","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Irrigation and nitrogen are the main inputs for crop yield and grain quality.
Aim: Although studies have been conducted on these applications across different plants, none have focused on yield and grain quality in teff.
Methods: This study was conducted to determine the effects of four different nitrogen doses (0, 30, 60, and 90 kg ha−1) and three different irrigation levels (50%, 75%, and 100% of ETo value calculated with the use of evaporations from Class-A pan) on grain yield, yield components, and grain quality traits (protein, starch profile, fatty acid composition) of teff (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter). A key teff cultivar with brown grains was used as the plant material. Experiments were conducted in a split-plot design with four replications over 2 years. Irrigation, nitrogen, years, and irrigation × nitrogen interactions were found to be significant for all parameters investigated (p < 0.01).
Results: Over 2 years, irrigation water requirements ranged from 340 mm in the I50 × N0 treatment to 603 mm in the I100 × N90 treatment. The highest irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE; 0.69 kg m−3) was observed in the I50 × N60 treatment, while the lowest (0.31 kg m−3) was observed in the I100 × N0 treatment. Similarly, crop water productivity (CWP) ranged from 0.29 kg m−3 (I100 × N0) to 0.52 kg m−3 (I75 × N60). For grain yield and components, the greatest grain yield was obtained from I75 × N60 treatments (2.52 t ha−1), the greatest biological yield was obtained from I100 × N90 treatments (6.83 t ha−1), the greatest harvest index was obtained from I50 × N60 treatments (26.01%), and the greatest thousand grain weight was obtained from I75 × N60 treatments (29.39 mg). Increased irrigation levels reduced crude protein content but increased crude ash and phytic acid, causing variations in resistant and total starch. Higher nitrogen doses raised crude protein, crude ash, and resistant starch while reducing phytic acid and amylopectin. The N90 dose provided the highest resistant starch, and the I50 × N90 combination yielded the highest amylose content. Irrigation and nitrogen significantly impacted starch and amylose ratios.
Conclusion: For optimal grain yield, biological yield, and quality, the I75 × N60 combination is recommended, as it enhances resistant starch, biological yield, and thousand-grain weight while maintaining balance in plant height and total starch content.
期刊介绍:
Established in 1922, the Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science (JPNSS) is an international peer-reviewed journal devoted to cover the entire spectrum of plant nutrition and soil science from different scale units, e.g. agroecosystem to natural systems. With its wide scope and focus on soil-plant interactions, JPNSS is one of the leading journals on this topic. Articles in JPNSS include reviews, high-standard original papers, and short communications and represent challenging research of international significance. The Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science is one of the world’s oldest journals. You can trust in a peer-reviewed journal that has been established in the plant and soil science community for almost 100 years.
Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science (ISSN 1436-8730) is published in six volumes per year, by the German Societies of Plant Nutrition (DGP) and Soil Science (DBG). Furthermore, the Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science (JPNSS) is a Cooperating Journal of the International Union of Soil Science (IUSS). The journal is produced by Wiley-VCH.
Topical Divisions of the Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science that are receiving increasing attention are:
JPNSS – Topical Divisions
Special timely focus in interdisciplinarity:
- sustainability & critical zone science.
Soil-Plant Interactions:
- rhizosphere science & soil ecology
- pollutant cycling & plant-soil protection
- land use & climate change.
Soil Science:
- soil chemistry & soil physics
- soil biology & biogeochemistry
- soil genesis & mineralogy.
Plant Nutrition:
- plant nutritional physiology
- nutrient dynamics & soil fertility
- ecophysiological aspects of plant nutrition.