Distinct differences in the zero hunger network among countries with varying income levels

IF 9.8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Geography and Sustainability Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-26 DOI:10.1016/j.geosus.2026.100517
Zhengkang Zhu, Tianshi Pan, Xiao Wang, Pete Smith, Yurui Li, Yu Chen, Lijun Zuo
{"title":"Distinct differences in the zero hunger network among countries with varying income levels","authors":"Zhengkang Zhu,&nbsp;Tianshi Pan,&nbsp;Xiao Wang,&nbsp;Pete Smith,&nbsp;Yurui Li,&nbsp;Yu Chen,&nbsp;Lijun Zuo","doi":"10.1016/j.geosus.2026.100517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Zero Hunger (Sustainable Development Goal 2, SDG 2) serves as a cornerstone for achieving global sustainable development, and is intricately linked with other SDGs exhibiting complex and multifaceted synergies and trade-offs. While the interconnections among indicators referring to food system within environmental domain have been widely investigated, interactions among indicators of all three pillars (social, economic, and environmental) remain under-researched. This study leverages the 2020 Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN) assessment data to construct a global SDG 2-related network comprising 38 targets and 61 indicators, and examine how this network’s structure varies across income levels. The results reveal high-income countries (HICs) have achieved notable advancements in eradicating hunger and improving agricultural productivity, while facing unique challenges of overnutrition. Low-income countries (LICs), by contrast, face persistent constraints in agricultural productivity, infrastructure, and resource access. Across the global SDG 2-related network, SDG 2 targets show direct synergies with 31 targets in other SDGs, covering all studied economic targets, whereas 10 targets exhibit direct trade-offs, all of which are related to the environment. The share of trade-offs declines as income rises, from 28 % in LICs to 13 % in HICs. Synergies mainly occur between economic targets in LICs, while they often occur between economic and social targets in HICs. Trade-offs linked to environmental targets indicate LICs rely more on natural resources, whereas HICs face environmental spillovers. These findings underscore the need for tailored strategies, with LICs prioritizing agricultural productivity and infrastructure, while HICs addressing social equity, social distribution, and environmental sustainability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52374,"journal":{"name":"Geography and Sustainability","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 100517"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geography and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666683926001124","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Zero Hunger (Sustainable Development Goal 2, SDG 2) serves as a cornerstone for achieving global sustainable development, and is intricately linked with other SDGs exhibiting complex and multifaceted synergies and trade-offs. While the interconnections among indicators referring to food system within environmental domain have been widely investigated, interactions among indicators of all three pillars (social, economic, and environmental) remain under-researched. This study leverages the 2020 Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN) assessment data to construct a global SDG 2-related network comprising 38 targets and 61 indicators, and examine how this network’s structure varies across income levels. The results reveal high-income countries (HICs) have achieved notable advancements in eradicating hunger and improving agricultural productivity, while facing unique challenges of overnutrition. Low-income countries (LICs), by contrast, face persistent constraints in agricultural productivity, infrastructure, and resource access. Across the global SDG 2-related network, SDG 2 targets show direct synergies with 31 targets in other SDGs, covering all studied economic targets, whereas 10 targets exhibit direct trade-offs, all of which are related to the environment. The share of trade-offs declines as income rises, from 28 % in LICs to 13 % in HICs. Synergies mainly occur between economic targets in LICs, while they often occur between economic and social targets in HICs. Trade-offs linked to environmental targets indicate LICs rely more on natural resources, whereas HICs face environmental spillovers. These findings underscore the need for tailored strategies, with LICs prioritizing agricultural productivity and infrastructure, while HICs addressing social equity, social distribution, and environmental sustainability.

Abstract Image

不同收入水平国家的零饥饿网络存在明显差异
零饥饿(可持续发展目标2,可持续发展目标2)是实现全球可持续发展的基石,与其他可持续发展目标有着错综复杂的联系,表现出复杂和多方面的协同效应和权衡。虽然环境领域内涉及粮食系统的指标之间的相互联系已被广泛研究,但所有三个支柱(社会,经济和环境)指标之间的相互作用仍未得到充分研究。本研究利用2020年可持续发展解决方案网络(SDSN)评估数据构建了一个包含38个具体目标和61个指标的全球可持续发展目标2相关网络,并研究了该网络结构在不同收入水平下的差异。研究结果显示,高收入国家在消除饥饿和提高农业生产力方面取得了显著进展,但也面临着营养过剩的独特挑战。相比之下,低收入国家在农业生产力、基础设施和资源获取方面长期面临制约。在全球可持续发展目标2相关网络中,可持续发展目标2与其他可持续发展目标中的31个目标表现出直接协同效应,涵盖了所有研究的经济目标,而10个目标表现出直接权衡,所有这些目标都与环境有关。随着收入的增加,权衡所占的比例下降,从低收入国家的28%降至高收入国家的13%。协同效应主要发生在低收入国家的经济目标之间,而高收入国家的经济和社会目标之间往往发生协同效应。与环境目标相关的权衡表明,低收入国家更多地依赖自然资源,而高收入国家则面临环境溢出效应。这些发现强调了有必要制定有针对性的战略,低收入国家优先考虑农业生产力和基础设施,而高收入国家则关注社会公平、社会分配和环境可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geography and Sustainability
Geography and Sustainability Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
16.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
32
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Geography and Sustainability serves as a central hub for interdisciplinary research and education aimed at promoting sustainable development from an integrated geography perspective. By bridging natural and human sciences, the journal fosters broader analysis and innovative thinking on global and regional sustainability issues. Geography and Sustainability welcomes original, high-quality research articles, review articles, short communications, technical comments, perspective articles and editorials on the following themes: Geographical Processes: Interactions with and between water, soil, atmosphere and the biosphere and their spatio-temporal variations; Human-Environmental Systems: Interactions between humans and the environment, resilience of socio-ecological systems and vulnerability; Ecosystem Services and Human Wellbeing: Ecosystem structure, processes, services and their linkages with human wellbeing; Sustainable Development: Theory, practice and critical challenges in sustainable development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书