KGMedQA: An automated and comprehensive KG-based benchmark for biomedical LLM assessment

IF 8.9
AI Open Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-29 DOI:10.1016/j.aiopen.2026.07.001
Qirui Hao, Kewei Cheng, Xinyu Liu, Hongliang Wang, Junming Shao, Carl Yang
{"title":"KGMedQA: An automated and comprehensive KG-based benchmark for biomedical LLM assessment","authors":"Qirui Hao,&nbsp;Kewei Cheng,&nbsp;Xinyu Liu,&nbsp;Hongliang Wang,&nbsp;Junming Shao,&nbsp;Carl Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.aiopen.2026.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has significantly advanced natural language understanding, generation, and reasoning across various domains, including the biomedical field. Despite these advancements, the evaluation of biomedical LLMs remains limited, primarily relying on manually crafted datasets which are insufficient for comprehensively assessing LLMs’ capabilities. To address this challenge and cater specifically to the requirements of biomedical LLMs, we propose KGMedQA, an innovative evaluation benchmark based on knowledge graphs (KGs) designed to assess the knowledge and reasoning abilities of LLMs. Through careful alignment between natural language and KG structures, KGMedQA can be applied to arbitrary KGs, enabling automated question/answer generation and LLM evaluation. By leveraging the advantages of KG structures, we design seven tasks of varying complexity and focus, accompanied by specialized evaluation metrics. Experiments conducted with KGMedQA involve ten different LLMs, including general and specialized biomedical models, tested across two KGs focusing on different types of biomedical knowledge and reasoning. Compared to traditional methods, our results uncover more novel insights. For instance, while specialized models exhibit strengths in knowledge, they have deficiencies in reasoning abilities compared to general models. Additionally, factors such as model scales and prompting methods also impact the performance of LLMs. Our benchmark represents advancements in the evaluation of domain-specific LLMs, offering an effective tool for future research and development. Our source code is available at: <span><span>https://github.com/PerseidsMeteorShower/KGMedQA</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100068,"journal":{"name":"AI Open","volume":"7 ","pages":"Pages 152-168"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666651026000124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has significantly advanced natural language understanding, generation, and reasoning across various domains, including the biomedical field. Despite these advancements, the evaluation of biomedical LLMs remains limited, primarily relying on manually crafted datasets which are insufficient for comprehensively assessing LLMs’ capabilities. To address this challenge and cater specifically to the requirements of biomedical LLMs, we propose KGMedQA, an innovative evaluation benchmark based on knowledge graphs (KGs) designed to assess the knowledge and reasoning abilities of LLMs. Through careful alignment between natural language and KG structures, KGMedQA can be applied to arbitrary KGs, enabling automated question/answer generation and LLM evaluation. By leveraging the advantages of KG structures, we design seven tasks of varying complexity and focus, accompanied by specialized evaluation metrics. Experiments conducted with KGMedQA involve ten different LLMs, including general and specialized biomedical models, tested across two KGs focusing on different types of biomedical knowledge and reasoning. Compared to traditional methods, our results uncover more novel insights. For instance, while specialized models exhibit strengths in knowledge, they have deficiencies in reasoning abilities compared to general models. Additionally, factors such as model scales and prompting methods also impact the performance of LLMs. Our benchmark represents advancements in the evaluation of domain-specific LLMs, offering an effective tool for future research and development. Our source code is available at: https://github.com/PerseidsMeteorShower/KGMedQA.
KGMedQA:用于生物医学法学硕士评估的自动化和全面的基于kg的基准
大型语言模型(llm)的出现显著地推动了自然语言的理解、生成和推理在各个领域的发展,包括生物医学领域。尽管取得了这些进步,但生物医学法学硕士的评估仍然有限,主要依赖于手工制作的数据集,这不足以全面评估法学硕士的能力。为了应对这一挑战,并专门满足生物医学法学硕士的要求,我们提出了KGMedQA,这是一个基于知识图(KGs)的创新评估基准,旨在评估法学硕士的知识和推理能力。通过自然语言和KG结构之间的仔细对齐,KGMedQA可以应用于任意KG,实现自动化问题/答案生成和LLM评估。通过利用KG结构的优势,我们设计了七种不同复杂性和重点的任务,并配有专门的评估指标。使用KGMedQA进行的实验涉及10种不同的法学硕士,包括一般和专门的生物医学模型,在两个侧重于不同类型的生物医学知识和推理的kg中进行测试。与传统方法相比,我们的结果揭示了更多新颖的见解。例如,虽然专业模型在知识方面表现出优势,但与一般模型相比,它们在推理能力方面存在不足。此外,模型尺度和提示方法等因素也会影响llm的性能。我们的基准代表了特定领域法学硕士评估的进步,为未来的研究和开发提供了有效的工具。我们的源代码可从https://github.com/PerseidsMeteorShower/KGMedQA获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
45.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书