A four-parameter laboratory risk stratification model at admission for 90-day mortality in hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury: a single-center derivation and internal validation study.

IF 2.9
Frontiers in nephrology Pub Date : 2026-07-17 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fneph.2026.1796660
Julian Müller-Kühnle, Mathias Becker, Severin Schricker, Wolfram Zoller, Jörg Latus, Moritz Schanz
{"title":"A four-parameter laboratory risk stratification model at admission for 90-day mortality in hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury: a single-center derivation and internal validation study.","authors":"Julian Müller-Kühnle, Mathias Becker, Severin Schricker, Wolfram Zoller, Jörg Latus, Moritz Schanz","doi":"10.3389/fneph.2026.1796660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI) is a high-mortality complication of advanced cirrhosis. Early risk stratification after hospital admission may support clinical assessment and research on escalation pathways, but simple admission-based models that avoid in-hospital data leakage remain limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective single-center derivation and internal-validation study of hospitalized adults with chart-review-confirmed HRS-AKI according to contemporary ADQI/ICA criteria. Candidate predictors were restricted <i>a priori</i> to admission laboratory values to minimize data leakage. Admission variables were prioritized using random-forest importance rankings under prespecified parsimony constraints, followed by endpoint-specific closed-form logistic regression models using an identical four-predictor set across outcomes. The primary endpoint was 90-day all-cause mortality. In-hospital hemodialysis and ICU admission were prespecified secondary endpoints and are reported as exploratory. Internal validation used bootstrap resampling with assessment of apparent and optimism-corrected discrimination and overall accuracy; calibration slope and calibration-in-the-large/intercept were reported descriptively. For contextual benchmarking, admission MELD, MELD-Na, and MELD 3.0 were evaluated as single-predictor logistic benchmark models for 90-day mortality within the same cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final analysis included 77 patients. The final predictor set comprised INR, albumin, ln(total bilirubin), and ln(C-reactive protein). For 90-day mortality, the final four-laboratory model showed an apparent AUC of 0.781 (95% CI, 0.715-0.926) and an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.758 (95% CI, 0.648-0.859), with an apparent Brier score of 0.144 (95% CI, 0.081-0.176), an optimism-corrected Brier score of 0.168 (95% CI, 0.117-0.212), an optimism-corrected calibration slope of 0.770, and an optimism-corrected calibration-in-the-large/intercept of 0.168. Performance for in-hospital hemodialysis and ICU admission was limited, with optimism-corrected AUCs of 0.580 (95% CI, 0.451-0.733) and 0.631 (95% CI, 0.514-0.737), respectively. MELD-family benchmarks showed numerically lower within-cohort discrimination than the four-laboratory model; these comparisons were descriptive and hypothesis-generating.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this single-center derivation and internal-validation study, an admission-based four-laboratory model showed moderate internally validated discrimination for 90-day mortality in hospitalized patients with HRS-AKI. The model should be interpreted as a preliminary risk-stratification approach requiring external validation and, if necessary, recalibration before clinical use. Secondary endpoint models for hemodialysis and ICU admission are exploratory and should not be used for threshold-based decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":73091,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in nephrology","volume":"6 ","pages":"1796660"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13423851/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneph.2026.1796660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI) is a high-mortality complication of advanced cirrhosis. Early risk stratification after hospital admission may support clinical assessment and research on escalation pathways, but simple admission-based models that avoid in-hospital data leakage remain limited.

Methods: We performed a retrospective single-center derivation and internal-validation study of hospitalized adults with chart-review-confirmed HRS-AKI according to contemporary ADQI/ICA criteria. Candidate predictors were restricted a priori to admission laboratory values to minimize data leakage. Admission variables were prioritized using random-forest importance rankings under prespecified parsimony constraints, followed by endpoint-specific closed-form logistic regression models using an identical four-predictor set across outcomes. The primary endpoint was 90-day all-cause mortality. In-hospital hemodialysis and ICU admission were prespecified secondary endpoints and are reported as exploratory. Internal validation used bootstrap resampling with assessment of apparent and optimism-corrected discrimination and overall accuracy; calibration slope and calibration-in-the-large/intercept were reported descriptively. For contextual benchmarking, admission MELD, MELD-Na, and MELD 3.0 were evaluated as single-predictor logistic benchmark models for 90-day mortality within the same cohort.

Results: The final analysis included 77 patients. The final predictor set comprised INR, albumin, ln(total bilirubin), and ln(C-reactive protein). For 90-day mortality, the final four-laboratory model showed an apparent AUC of 0.781 (95% CI, 0.715-0.926) and an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.758 (95% CI, 0.648-0.859), with an apparent Brier score of 0.144 (95% CI, 0.081-0.176), an optimism-corrected Brier score of 0.168 (95% CI, 0.117-0.212), an optimism-corrected calibration slope of 0.770, and an optimism-corrected calibration-in-the-large/intercept of 0.168. Performance for in-hospital hemodialysis and ICU admission was limited, with optimism-corrected AUCs of 0.580 (95% CI, 0.451-0.733) and 0.631 (95% CI, 0.514-0.737), respectively. MELD-family benchmarks showed numerically lower within-cohort discrimination than the four-laboratory model; these comparisons were descriptive and hypothesis-generating.

Conclusions: In this single-center derivation and internal-validation study, an admission-based four-laboratory model showed moderate internally validated discrimination for 90-day mortality in hospitalized patients with HRS-AKI. The model should be interpreted as a preliminary risk-stratification approach requiring external validation and, if necessary, recalibration before clinical use. Secondary endpoint models for hemodialysis and ICU admission are exploratory and should not be used for threshold-based decision-making.

肝肾综合征-急性肾损伤入院时90天死亡率的四参数实验室风险分层模型:单中心推导和内部验证研究。
背景:肝肾综合征-急性肾损伤(HRS-AKI)是晚期肝硬化的高死亡率并发症。入院后的早期风险分层可能支持临床评估和升级途径的研究,但避免院内数据泄露的基于入院的简单模型仍然有限。方法:根据当代ADQI/ICA标准,我们对住院成人患者进行了回顾性单中心推导和内部验证研究。候选预测因子被先验地限制为入院实验室值,以尽量减少数据泄漏。在预先设定的节俭约束下,使用随机森林重要性排序对入院变量进行优先排序,然后使用相同的四个预测因子集进行终点特定的封闭形式逻辑回归模型。主要终点为90天全因死亡率。住院血液透析和ICU住院是预先指定的次要终点,报告为探索性的。内部验证采用自举重采样,评估表观和乐观校正的辨别力和总体准确性;描述性地报告了校准斜率和校准大/截距。对于上下文基准,将入院MELD、MELD- na和MELD 3.0作为同一队列中90天死亡率的单预测因素logistic基准模型进行评估。结果:最终分析纳入77例患者。最终预测集包括INR、白蛋白、总胆红素和c反应蛋白。对于90天死亡率,最终的四实验室模型的表观AUC为0.781 (95% CI, 0.715-0.926),乐观校正的AUC为0.758 (95% CI, 0.648-0.859),表观Brier评分为0.144 (95% CI, 0.081-0.176),乐观校正的Brier评分为0.168 (95% CI, 0.117-0.212),乐观校正的校准斜率为0.770,乐观校正的校准大/截距为0.168。住院血液透析和ICU住院的表现有限,乐观校正的auc分别为0.580 (95% CI, 0.451-0.733)和0.631 (95% CI, 0.514-0.737)。meld家庭基准显示,与四实验室模型相比,队列内歧视的数值较低;这些比较是描述性的,并产生了假设。结论:在这项单中心推导和内部验证研究中,基于住院的四实验室模型显示出对住院HRS-AKI患者90天死亡率的中度内部验证歧视。该模型应被解释为一种需要外部验证的初步风险分层方法,如有必要,在临床使用前进行重新校准。血液透析和ICU入院的次要终点模型是探索性的,不应用于基于阈值的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书