How to Improve the Management of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions? Role of Medical History and Complementary Imaging.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Tobias Kleemann, Philip Podlesny, Quang Trung Tran, Denise Müller, Philipp Göltl, Matthias Ebert, Sebastian Belle, Michael Hirth
{"title":"How to Improve the Management of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions? Role of Medical History and Complementary Imaging.","authors":"Tobias Kleemann, Philip Podlesny, Quang Trung Tran, Denise Müller, Philipp Göltl, Matthias Ebert, Sebastian Belle, Michael Hirth","doi":"10.1159/000552938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Preoperative characterization of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) remains inaccurate when based on morphology alone. We aimed to determine whether integrating complementary imaging (cross-sectional imaging plus endoscopic ultrasound) and clinical history, particularly history of pancreatitis, improves diagnostic accuracy compared with single-modality imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included consecutive patients with PCLs treated at a tertiary referral center (test cohort) and a confirmatory cohort from a second hospital. Preoperative diagnostic accuracy was assessed in patients with histological confirmation. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors of correct preoperative diagnosis. Additionally, a secondary multivariable logistic regression analysis included all patients using final diagnosis at follow-up (mean 2.4 ± 0.3 years) was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the test cohort, 258 patients were analyzed; 59 (23%) had histological confirmation. Overall preoperative accuracy was 63% (validation cohort: 68%). No significant difference was observed between MRI, CT, or endoscopic ultrasound alone. Complementary imaging was independently associated with higher diagnostic accuracy in multivariable analysis, as was main pancreatic duct dilation. In the full cohort, a history of acute or chronic pancreatitis was the only independent predictor of correct diagnosis and strongly predicted pseudocysts (80% vs. 10% without pancreatitis; <i>p</i> < 0.00001). Combining complementary imaging with pancreatitis history further improved overall diagnostic accuracy and significantly increased detection of malignant PCLs compared with MRI alone (<i>p</i> = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Diagnostic accuracy of PCLs is limited with single-modality imaging. A stepwise strategy integrating complementary imaging and clinical history, particularly a history of pancreatitis, significantly improves identification of malignant lesions and may refine guideline-based management.</p>","PeriodicalId":56003,"journal":{"name":"Visceral Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13427356/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visceral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000552938","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Preoperative characterization of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) remains inaccurate when based on morphology alone. We aimed to determine whether integrating complementary imaging (cross-sectional imaging plus endoscopic ultrasound) and clinical history, particularly history of pancreatitis, improves diagnostic accuracy compared with single-modality imaging.

Methods: This retrospective study included consecutive patients with PCLs treated at a tertiary referral center (test cohort) and a confirmatory cohort from a second hospital. Preoperative diagnostic accuracy was assessed in patients with histological confirmation. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors of correct preoperative diagnosis. Additionally, a secondary multivariable logistic regression analysis included all patients using final diagnosis at follow-up (mean 2.4 ± 0.3 years) was performed.

Results: In the test cohort, 258 patients were analyzed; 59 (23%) had histological confirmation. Overall preoperative accuracy was 63% (validation cohort: 68%). No significant difference was observed between MRI, CT, or endoscopic ultrasound alone. Complementary imaging was independently associated with higher diagnostic accuracy in multivariable analysis, as was main pancreatic duct dilation. In the full cohort, a history of acute or chronic pancreatitis was the only independent predictor of correct diagnosis and strongly predicted pseudocysts (80% vs. 10% without pancreatitis; p < 0.00001). Combining complementary imaging with pancreatitis history further improved overall diagnostic accuracy and significantly increased detection of malignant PCLs compared with MRI alone (p = 0.03).

Conclusion: Diagnostic accuracy of PCLs is limited with single-modality imaging. A stepwise strategy integrating complementary imaging and clinical history, particularly a history of pancreatitis, significantly improves identification of malignant lesions and may refine guideline-based management.

如何改善胰腺囊性病变的治疗?病史和辅助影像的作用。
术前胰腺囊性病变(PCLs)的特征仍然不准确时,仅基于形态学。我们的目的是确定是否整合互补成像(横断面成像加内窥镜超声)和临床病史,特别是胰腺炎病史,提高诊断准确性与单模态成像相比。方法:本回顾性研究包括在三级转诊中心连续治疗的pcl患者(试验队列)和来自第二家医院的验证队列。对组织学证实的患者进行术前诊断准确性评估。多变量logistic回归确定了术前正确诊断的独立预测因素。此外,在随访时(平均2.4±0.3年)对所有最终诊断的患者进行二次多变量logistic回归分析。结果:在测试队列中,分析了258例患者;59例(23%)有组织学证实。总体术前准确度为63%(验证队列:68%)。单独使用MRI、CT或内窥镜超声检查无显著差异。在多变量分析中,辅助成像与较高的诊断准确性独立相关,主胰管扩张也是如此。在整个队列中,急性或慢性胰腺炎病史是正确诊断的唯一独立预测因素,并强烈预测假性囊肿(80% vs. 10%无胰腺炎;p < 0.00001)。与单独MRI相比,将辅助成像与胰腺炎病史相结合进一步提高了总体诊断准确性,并显著提高了恶性pcl的检出率(p = 0.03)。结论:单模态影像学诊断pcl的准确性有限。将互补成像和临床病史,特别是胰腺炎病史相结合的逐步策略,可显著提高恶性病变的识别,并可完善基于指南的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Visceral Medicine
Visceral Medicine Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: This interdisciplinary journal is unique in its field as it covers the principles of both gastrointestinal medicine and surgery required for treating abdominal diseases. In each issue invited reviews provide a comprehensive overview of one selected topic. Thus, a sound background of the state of the art in clinical practice and research is provided. A panel of specialists in gastroenterology, surgery, radiology, and pathology discusses different approaches to diagnosis and treatment of the topic covered in the respective issue. Original articles, case reports, and commentaries make for further interesting reading.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书