Building bridges to care: A co-created community palliative care package for resource-limited settings.

IF 2.7 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative Care and Social Practice Pub Date : 2026-07-29 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26323524261474054
Ngozi Idemili-Aronu, Ikechukwu Alex Okoli, John Oluwaseyi Jemisenia, John Olajide Olawepo, Tonia Chinyelu Onyeka, Jean Hunleth, Karla T Washington, Gregory A Aarons, Echezona Edozie Ezeanolue
{"title":"Building bridges to care: A co-created community palliative care package for resource-limited settings.","authors":"Ngozi Idemili-Aronu, Ikechukwu Alex Okoli, John Oluwaseyi Jemisenia, John Olajide Olawepo, Tonia Chinyelu Onyeka, Jean Hunleth, Karla T Washington, Gregory A Aarons, Echezona Edozie Ezeanolue","doi":"10.1177/26323524261474054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliative care (PC) needs are substantial in Nigeria, yet access to specialist PC services remains limited, particularly in rural and peri-urban communities.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To co-create an implementation-ready, community-delivered PC package for rural Nigerian settings without PC specialists and specify its components, delivery roles, and referral pathways.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Sequential explanatory mixed-methods, participatory co-creation design in which quantitative prioritization informed qualitative refinement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (health professionals, traditional and religious leaders, patients, caregivers, advocates, and policymakers) used <i>Mentimeter®</i> to generate and rank feasible non-pharmacologic components, followed by an adapted Group Model Building (GMB) process to identify key health-system and sociocultural determinants, specify the most appropriate delivery settings and cadres, and define delivery processes and referral pathways to basic PC providers at facilities. The process included three pre-workshop virtual sessions (n=51) and a 5-day in-person GMB workshop in Enugu, Nigeria (n=45), with diverse participants from all six geopolitical regions recruited via the ICON-3 Practice-Based Research Network. Outputs were refined through participant validation and technical expert review to enhance feasibility and implementation readiness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants prioritized effective pain and symptom relief, strengthened communication and shared decision-making, intentional engagement of religious leaders, and improved community-primary care collaboration. The resulting package comprises three components (pain and symptom management, psychosocial support, spiritual care) delivered via a hub-and-spoke model in which CHEWs/CHAs serve as community \"Anchors,\" while facility-based basic PC providers and tertiary specialists provide oversight and manage complex cases. Key barriers included limited training and stigma, medication access constraints, and weak referral systems; proposed solutions emphasized training with supportive supervision, improved medicines access/financing and strengthened referral pathways and community support structures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A participant-designed, task-shared, hub-linked community PC package is feasible in principle for Nigerian settings without PC specialists and provides an implementation-ready blueprint for feasibility testing, adaptation, and scale-up planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":36693,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","volume":"20 ","pages":"26323524261474054"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13424511/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524261474054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Palliative care (PC) needs are substantial in Nigeria, yet access to specialist PC services remains limited, particularly in rural and peri-urban communities.

Objectives: To co-create an implementation-ready, community-delivered PC package for rural Nigerian settings without PC specialists and specify its components, delivery roles, and referral pathways.

Design: Sequential explanatory mixed-methods, participatory co-creation design in which quantitative prioritization informed qualitative refinement.

Methods: Participants (health professionals, traditional and religious leaders, patients, caregivers, advocates, and policymakers) used Mentimeter® to generate and rank feasible non-pharmacologic components, followed by an adapted Group Model Building (GMB) process to identify key health-system and sociocultural determinants, specify the most appropriate delivery settings and cadres, and define delivery processes and referral pathways to basic PC providers at facilities. The process included three pre-workshop virtual sessions (n=51) and a 5-day in-person GMB workshop in Enugu, Nigeria (n=45), with diverse participants from all six geopolitical regions recruited via the ICON-3 Practice-Based Research Network. Outputs were refined through participant validation and technical expert review to enhance feasibility and implementation readiness.

Results: Participants prioritized effective pain and symptom relief, strengthened communication and shared decision-making, intentional engagement of religious leaders, and improved community-primary care collaboration. The resulting package comprises three components (pain and symptom management, psychosocial support, spiritual care) delivered via a hub-and-spoke model in which CHEWs/CHAs serve as community "Anchors," while facility-based basic PC providers and tertiary specialists provide oversight and manage complex cases. Key barriers included limited training and stigma, medication access constraints, and weak referral systems; proposed solutions emphasized training with supportive supervision, improved medicines access/financing and strengthened referral pathways and community support structures.

Conclusion: A participant-designed, task-shared, hub-linked community PC package is feasible in principle for Nigerian settings without PC specialists and provides an implementation-ready blueprint for feasibility testing, adaptation, and scale-up planning.

为护理搭建桥梁:为资源有限的环境共同创建的社区姑息治疗一揽子计划。
背景:尼日利亚对姑息治疗(PC)的需求很大,但获得专业姑息治疗服务的机会仍然有限,特别是在农村和城郊社区。目标:共同创建一个可实施的、社区交付的PC包,适用于没有PC专家的尼日利亚农村环境,并指定其组件、交付角色和转诊途径。设计:顺序解释混合方法,参与式共同创造设计,其中定量优先级通知定性改进。方法:参与者(卫生专业人员、传统和宗教领袖、患者、护理人员、倡导者和政策制定者)使用Mentimeter®生成可行的非药物成分并对其进行排名,随后采用经过调整的群体模型构建(GMB)过程来确定关键的卫生系统和社会文化决定因素,指定最合适的交付环境和干部,并定义交付流程和向设施中的基本PC提供者转诊的途径。该过程包括三次研讨会前虚拟会议(n=51)和在尼日利亚埃努古举行的为期5天的GMB现场研讨会(n=45),通过ICON-3基于实践的研究网络招募了来自所有六个地缘政治区域的不同参与者。通过参与者验证和技术专家审查,改进了产出,以提高可行性和实施准备。结果:参与者优先考虑有效的疼痛和症状缓解,加强沟通和共同决策,宗教领袖有意参与,改善社区初级保健合作。由此产生的一揽子服务包括三个组成部分(疼痛和症状管理、社会心理支持、精神护理),通过中心和辐射模式提供,CHEWs/CHAs作为社区“锚”,而基于设施的基本PC提供者和三级专家提供监督和管理复杂病例。主要障碍包括有限的培训和耻辱,药物获取限制和薄弱的转诊系统;拟议的解决办法强调培训与支持性监督、改善药品获取/融资以及加强转诊途径和社区支持结构。结论:参与者设计、任务共享、中心连接的社区PC包原则上适用于没有PC专家的尼日利亚环境,并为可行性测试、调整和扩大规划提供了可实施的蓝图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative Care and Social Practice
Palliative Care and Social Practice Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书