Ngozi Idemili-Aronu, Ikechukwu Alex Okoli, John Oluwaseyi Jemisenia, John Olajide Olawepo, Tonia Chinyelu Onyeka, Jean Hunleth, Karla T Washington, Gregory A Aarons, Echezona Edozie Ezeanolue
{"title":"Building bridges to care: A co-created community palliative care package for resource-limited settings.","authors":"Ngozi Idemili-Aronu, Ikechukwu Alex Okoli, John Oluwaseyi Jemisenia, John Olajide Olawepo, Tonia Chinyelu Onyeka, Jean Hunleth, Karla T Washington, Gregory A Aarons, Echezona Edozie Ezeanolue","doi":"10.1177/26323524261474054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliative care (PC) needs are substantial in Nigeria, yet access to specialist PC services remains limited, particularly in rural and peri-urban communities.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To co-create an implementation-ready, community-delivered PC package for rural Nigerian settings without PC specialists and specify its components, delivery roles, and referral pathways.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Sequential explanatory mixed-methods, participatory co-creation design in which quantitative prioritization informed qualitative refinement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (health professionals, traditional and religious leaders, patients, caregivers, advocates, and policymakers) used <i>Mentimeter®</i> to generate and rank feasible non-pharmacologic components, followed by an adapted Group Model Building (GMB) process to identify key health-system and sociocultural determinants, specify the most appropriate delivery settings and cadres, and define delivery processes and referral pathways to basic PC providers at facilities. The process included three pre-workshop virtual sessions (n=51) and a 5-day in-person GMB workshop in Enugu, Nigeria (n=45), with diverse participants from all six geopolitical regions recruited via the ICON-3 Practice-Based Research Network. Outputs were refined through participant validation and technical expert review to enhance feasibility and implementation readiness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants prioritized effective pain and symptom relief, strengthened communication and shared decision-making, intentional engagement of religious leaders, and improved community-primary care collaboration. The resulting package comprises three components (pain and symptom management, psychosocial support, spiritual care) delivered via a hub-and-spoke model in which CHEWs/CHAs serve as community \"Anchors,\" while facility-based basic PC providers and tertiary specialists provide oversight and manage complex cases. Key barriers included limited training and stigma, medication access constraints, and weak referral systems; proposed solutions emphasized training with supportive supervision, improved medicines access/financing and strengthened referral pathways and community support structures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A participant-designed, task-shared, hub-linked community PC package is feasible in principle for Nigerian settings without PC specialists and provides an implementation-ready blueprint for feasibility testing, adaptation, and scale-up planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":36693,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","volume":"20 ","pages":"26323524261474054"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13424511/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524261474054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Palliative care (PC) needs are substantial in Nigeria, yet access to specialist PC services remains limited, particularly in rural and peri-urban communities.
Objectives: To co-create an implementation-ready, community-delivered PC package for rural Nigerian settings without PC specialists and specify its components, delivery roles, and referral pathways.
Design: Sequential explanatory mixed-methods, participatory co-creation design in which quantitative prioritization informed qualitative refinement.
Methods: Participants (health professionals, traditional and religious leaders, patients, caregivers, advocates, and policymakers) used Mentimeter® to generate and rank feasible non-pharmacologic components, followed by an adapted Group Model Building (GMB) process to identify key health-system and sociocultural determinants, specify the most appropriate delivery settings and cadres, and define delivery processes and referral pathways to basic PC providers at facilities. The process included three pre-workshop virtual sessions (n=51) and a 5-day in-person GMB workshop in Enugu, Nigeria (n=45), with diverse participants from all six geopolitical regions recruited via the ICON-3 Practice-Based Research Network. Outputs were refined through participant validation and technical expert review to enhance feasibility and implementation readiness.
Results: Participants prioritized effective pain and symptom relief, strengthened communication and shared decision-making, intentional engagement of religious leaders, and improved community-primary care collaboration. The resulting package comprises three components (pain and symptom management, psychosocial support, spiritual care) delivered via a hub-and-spoke model in which CHEWs/CHAs serve as community "Anchors," while facility-based basic PC providers and tertiary specialists provide oversight and manage complex cases. Key barriers included limited training and stigma, medication access constraints, and weak referral systems; proposed solutions emphasized training with supportive supervision, improved medicines access/financing and strengthened referral pathways and community support structures.
Conclusion: A participant-designed, task-shared, hub-linked community PC package is feasible in principle for Nigerian settings without PC specialists and provides an implementation-ready blueprint for feasibility testing, adaptation, and scale-up planning.