Influence of target coverage priority levels on dose homogeneity in commercial automated field-in-field planning for breast radiotherapy.

IF 1.6 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Radiological Physics and Technology Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-01 DOI:10.1007/s12194-026-01119-w
Hideharu Miura, Yoshiko Doi, Masanori Ochi, Masahiro Kenjo, Shuichi Ozawa
{"title":"Influence of target coverage priority levels on dose homogeneity in commercial automated field-in-field planning for breast radiotherapy.","authors":"Hideharu Miura, Yoshiko Doi, Masanori Ochi, Masahiro Kenjo, Shuichi Ozawa","doi":"10.1007/s12194-026-01119-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate the impact of five automated field-in-field (Auto FIF) priority levels in RayStation on dosimetric parameters in left-sided whole-breast radiotherapy. Ten women with early-stage left-sided breast cancer were planned with standard tangential fields and Auto FIF at priority levels 1-5 in deep inspiration breath hold. The evaluated metrics were CTV_eval D<sub>98%</sub> and D<sub>2%</sub>, homogeneity index (HI), and ipsilateral lung V<sub>40Gy</sub>. CTV_eval D<sub>98%</sub> remained close to the prescription dose across all priority levels, whereas higher priority levels increased CTV_eval D<sub>2%</sub> and HI, indicating more pronounced high-dose regions and reduced dose homogeneity. Ipsilateral lung V<sub>40Gy</sub> increased at higher priority levels, but high-dose lung volumes remained small. Higher Auto FIF priority levels yielded only minimal gains in target coverage while increasing high-dose regions and reducing dose homogeneity. Priority levels 1 and 2 provided the most favorable balance between target coverage and organ-at-risk sparing.</p>","PeriodicalId":46252,"journal":{"name":"Radiological Physics and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1466-1472"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiological Physics and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-026-01119-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To evaluate the impact of five automated field-in-field (Auto FIF) priority levels in RayStation on dosimetric parameters in left-sided whole-breast radiotherapy. Ten women with early-stage left-sided breast cancer were planned with standard tangential fields and Auto FIF at priority levels 1-5 in deep inspiration breath hold. The evaluated metrics were CTV_eval D98% and D2%, homogeneity index (HI), and ipsilateral lung V40Gy. CTV_eval D98% remained close to the prescription dose across all priority levels, whereas higher priority levels increased CTV_eval D2% and HI, indicating more pronounced high-dose regions and reduced dose homogeneity. Ipsilateral lung V40Gy increased at higher priority levels, but high-dose lung volumes remained small. Higher Auto FIF priority levels yielded only minimal gains in target coverage while increasing high-dose regions and reducing dose homogeneity. Priority levels 1 and 2 provided the most favorable balance between target coverage and organ-at-risk sparing.

靶覆盖优先级对商业自动化乳腺放疗场内规划剂量均匀性的影响。
评估RayStation中5个自动场中场(Auto FIF)优先级对左侧全乳放疗剂量学参数的影响。对10例早期左侧乳腺癌患者进行标准切向场和Auto FIF深吸气屏气优先级1-5级。评价指标为CTV_eval D98%和D2%、均匀性指数(HI)和同侧肺V40Gy。CTV_eval D98%在所有优先级水平上仍接近处方剂量,而较高的优先级水平使CTV_eval D2%和HI增加,表明高剂量区域更明显,剂量均匀性降低。同侧肺V40Gy优先增加,但高剂量肺体积仍然很小。更高的Auto - FIF优先级别在增加高剂量区域和降低剂量均匀性的同时,仅在目标覆盖方面取得了最小的收益。优先级别1和2在目标覆盖和有风险器官保护之间提供了最有利的平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiological Physics and Technology
Radiological Physics and Technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal Radiological Physics and Technology is to provide a forum for sharing new knowledge related to research and development in radiological science and technology, including medical physics and radiological technology in diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine, and radiation therapy among many other radiological disciplines, as well as to contribute to progress and improvement in medical practice and patient health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书