A primer on artificial intelligence for palliative care educators.

IF 2.7 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative Care and Social Practice Pub Date : 2026-07-30 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26323524261474075
Jennifer Simoni, Diglio A Simoni
{"title":"A primer on artificial intelligence for palliative care educators.","authors":"Jennifer Simoni, Diglio A Simoni","doi":"10.1177/26323524261474075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly being adopted in education in the health care professions, including in palliative care. Yet existing AI primers for health professions education (HPE) are not specific to palliative care (PC) and overlook the relational, prognostic, and cultural sensitivities central to the field. This narrative primer addresses that gap. Informed by a review of the literature, it equips PC educators with practical guidance for responsibly harnessing AI. We first introduce foundational AI concepts relevant to educators and clinicians, including machine learning (ML), large language models (LLMs), generative AI (GenAI) and agentic AI. We then trace a progression from general HPE use, such as study support, assessment, and AI-enhanced simulation, to PC-specific applications in curriculum design, serious-illness communication training, and interprofessional teamwork. Throughout, we situate the risks where they arise, with attention to concerns most consequential for PC: bias, communication integrity and hallucination, data privacy, and over-reliance on AI, in a field where relational, humanistic practice and nuanced communication are central. Guiding principles of ethics, equity, and patient-centeredness anchor the discussion. We close with concrete implications for educators and curriculum development: building AI literacy, establishing governance and appropriate-use policies, and verifying AI-generated outputs against trusted sources. The aim is an educator-AI partnership that safeguards what is essential in PC: compassionate, dignified, patient-centered decision-making and care.</p>","PeriodicalId":36693,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","volume":"20 ","pages":"26323524261474075"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13424772/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524261474075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly being adopted in education in the health care professions, including in palliative care. Yet existing AI primers for health professions education (HPE) are not specific to palliative care (PC) and overlook the relational, prognostic, and cultural sensitivities central to the field. This narrative primer addresses that gap. Informed by a review of the literature, it equips PC educators with practical guidance for responsibly harnessing AI. We first introduce foundational AI concepts relevant to educators and clinicians, including machine learning (ML), large language models (LLMs), generative AI (GenAI) and agentic AI. We then trace a progression from general HPE use, such as study support, assessment, and AI-enhanced simulation, to PC-specific applications in curriculum design, serious-illness communication training, and interprofessional teamwork. Throughout, we situate the risks where they arise, with attention to concerns most consequential for PC: bias, communication integrity and hallucination, data privacy, and over-reliance on AI, in a field where relational, humanistic practice and nuanced communication are central. Guiding principles of ethics, equity, and patient-centeredness anchor the discussion. We close with concrete implications for educators and curriculum development: building AI literacy, establishing governance and appropriate-use policies, and verifying AI-generated outputs against trusted sources. The aim is an educator-AI partnership that safeguards what is essential in PC: compassionate, dignified, patient-centered decision-making and care.

给姑息治疗教育者的人工智能入门。
人工智能(AI)正在迅速应用于卫生保健专业的教育,包括姑息治疗。然而,现有的卫生专业教育(HPE)人工智能入门读物并非针对姑息治疗(PC),并且忽略了该领域核心的关系、预后和文化敏感性。这篇叙事入门文章解决了这一差距。通过对文献的回顾,它为PC教育工作者提供了负责任地利用人工智能的实践指导。我们首先介绍与教育工作者和临床医生相关的基本人工智能概念,包括机器学习(ML),大型语言模型(llm),生成人工智能(GenAI)和代理人工智能。然后,我们追溯了从一般HPE应用(如学习支持、评估和人工智能增强模拟)到pc特定应用在课程设计、重病沟通培训和跨专业团队合作中的进展。在整个过程中,我们将风险定位在它们出现的地方,并关注PC最重要的问题:偏见、沟通完整性和幻觉、数据隐私和过度依赖人工智能,在一个关系、人文实践和细致入微的沟通为中心的领域。伦理、公平和以病人为中心的指导原则主导了讨论。最后,我们提出了对教育工作者和课程开发的具体影响:建立人工智能素养,建立治理和适当使用政策,并根据可信来源验证人工智能生成的输出。其目标是建立教育者与人工智能的合作伙伴关系,以保障个人计算机的基本要素:富有同情心、有尊严、以患者为中心的决策和护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative Care and Social Practice
Palliative Care and Social Practice Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书