Guidewire-bile duct angle as a determinant of stent delivery success in EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy: a prospective double-lumen dilator cohort with propensity score-matched historical controls.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2026-07-30 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562848261470177
Naoto Aoyama, Takeshi Ogura, Yoshitaro Yamamoto, Saori Ueno, Atsushi Okuda, Nobu Nishioka, Junichi Nakamura, Nobuhiro Hattori, Kimi Bessho, Takafumi Kanadani, Nga Nguyen Trong, Ly Kim Chhun, Ahmad F Aboelezz, Yi-Jun Liao, Szu-Chia Liao, Hiroki Nishikawa
{"title":"Guidewire-bile duct angle as a determinant of stent delivery success in EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy: a prospective double-lumen dilator cohort with propensity score-matched historical controls.","authors":"Naoto Aoyama, Takeshi Ogura, Yoshitaro Yamamoto, Saori Ueno, Atsushi Okuda, Nobu Nishioka, Junichi Nakamura, Nobuhiro Hattori, Kimi Bessho, Takafumi Kanadani, Nga Nguyen Trong, Ly Kim Chhun, Ahmad F Aboelezz, Yi-Jun Liao, Szu-Chia Liao, Hiroki Nishikawa","doi":"10.1177/17562848261470177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Failure of stent delivery remains a major technical limitation of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS), often necessitating additional tract dilation and increasing procedural complexity and cost.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the guidewire-bile duct angle is associated with stent delivery success in EUS-HGS, and to explore whether a double-lumen dilator (DLD) is associated with procedural improvement consistent with an angle-mediated mechanism rather than direct mechanical advantage.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective observational study with a propensity score-matched historical control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective single-arm observational study of patients undergoing EUS-HGS using a DLD, compared with a propensity score-matched historical (retrospective) cohort that underwent conventional dilation. The main outcome was successful stent delivery without additional tract dilation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 25 patients in the DLD group were compared with 25 matched controls. Successful stent delivery without additional dilation was significantly higher in the DLD group than in the conventional group (92% vs 48%, <i>p</i> = 0.001). The guidewire-bile duct angle measured immediately before stent delivery-system insertion was significantly larger in the DLD group than in the conventional group (153.4° vs 123.3°, <i>p</i> < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, a larger guidewire-bile duct angle remained independently associated with successful stent delivery without additional tract dilation (odds ratio per 10-degree increase, 5.49; 95% confidence interval, 2.79-10.83; <i>p</i> < 0.001), whereas DLD use itself was not independently associated with success after adjustment for angle. Device-related costs were lower in the DLD group due to reduced need for additional dilation. The guidewire-bile duct angle showed excellent apparent discrimination in this cohort, with an exploratory threshold of 126° (AUC 0.969), requiring external validation before clinical implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, the improvement associated with DLD use was consistent with an angle-mediated mechanism rather than a direct effect of dilation force; these findings should be regarded as hypothesis-generating mechanistic evidence rather than mechanistic proof.</p>","PeriodicalId":48770,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","volume":"19 ","pages":"17562848261470177"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13424775/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848261470177","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Failure of stent delivery remains a major technical limitation of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS), often necessitating additional tract dilation and increasing procedural complexity and cost.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the guidewire-bile duct angle is associated with stent delivery success in EUS-HGS, and to explore whether a double-lumen dilator (DLD) is associated with procedural improvement consistent with an angle-mediated mechanism rather than direct mechanical advantage.

Design: Prospective observational study with a propensity score-matched historical control.

Methods: This was a prospective single-arm observational study of patients undergoing EUS-HGS using a DLD, compared with a propensity score-matched historical (retrospective) cohort that underwent conventional dilation. The main outcome was successful stent delivery without additional tract dilation.

Results: A total of 25 patients in the DLD group were compared with 25 matched controls. Successful stent delivery without additional dilation was significantly higher in the DLD group than in the conventional group (92% vs 48%, p = 0.001). The guidewire-bile duct angle measured immediately before stent delivery-system insertion was significantly larger in the DLD group than in the conventional group (153.4° vs 123.3°, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, a larger guidewire-bile duct angle remained independently associated with successful stent delivery without additional tract dilation (odds ratio per 10-degree increase, 5.49; 95% confidence interval, 2.79-10.83; p < 0.001), whereas DLD use itself was not independently associated with success after adjustment for angle. Device-related costs were lower in the DLD group due to reduced need for additional dilation. The guidewire-bile duct angle showed excellent apparent discrimination in this cohort, with an exploratory threshold of 126° (AUC 0.969), requiring external validation before clinical implementation.

Conclusion: In conclusion, the improvement associated with DLD use was consistent with an angle-mediated mechanism rather than a direct effect of dilation force; these findings should be regarded as hypothesis-generating mechanistic evidence rather than mechanistic proof.

导尿管-胆管角度作为eus引导下肝胃造口术支架置入成功的决定因素:一项具有倾向评分匹配历史对照的前瞻性双腔扩张器队列研究。
背景:支架置入失败仍然是内镜超声引导下肝胃造口术(EUS-HGS)的主要技术限制,通常需要额外的气道扩张,增加了手术的复杂性和成本。目的:本研究的目的是评估导丝-胆管角度是否与EUS-HGS支架置入成功相关,并探讨双腔扩张器(DLD)是否与角度介导机制一致的手术改善相关,而不是直接的机械优势。设计:前瞻性观察研究,采用倾向评分匹配的历史对照。方法:这是一项前瞻性单臂观察性研究,研究对象是使用DLD进行EUS-HGS的患者,与倾向评分匹配的接受常规扩张的历史(回顾性)队列进行比较。主要结果是支架置入成功,没有额外的气道扩张。结果:DLD组共25例患者与25例匹配的对照组进行比较。在没有额外扩张的情况下,DLD组支架置入成功率明显高于常规组(92% vs 48%, p = 0.001)。DLD组在置入支架前立即测量的导丝-胆管角度明显大于常规组(153.4°vs 123.3°,p)。结论:总之,使用DLD相关的改善符合角度介导的机制,而不是扩张力的直接作用,这些发现应被视为产生假设的机制证据,而不是机制证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.40%
发文量
103
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology is an open access journal which delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed original research articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of gastrointestinal and hepatic disorders. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at an international audience of clinicians and researchers in gastroenterology and related disciplines, providing an online forum for rapid dissemination of recent research and perspectives in this area. The editors welcome original research articles across all areas of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes original research articles and review articles primarily. Original research manuscripts may include laboratory, animal or human/clinical studies – all phases. Letters to the Editor and Case Reports will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书