From Detroit to Kansas City: Adapting the WE CARE Model to Improve Maternal and Infant Health.

IF 2.3 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Equity Pub Date : 2026-07-31 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/24731242261455680
Jenifer E Allsworth, Jannette Berkley-Patton, Bong Nguyen, Traci N Johnson, Anahi R Primgaard, Ayla T Nguyen, Gracyn J Pietrusinski, Khushi Patel, Martina T Caldwell, Stefanie R Ellison
{"title":"From Detroit to Kansas City: Adapting the WE CARE Model to Improve Maternal and Infant Health.","authors":"Jenifer E Allsworth, Jannette Berkley-Patton, Bong Nguyen, Traci N Johnson, Anahi R Primgaard, Ayla T Nguyen, Gracyn J Pietrusinski, Khushi Patel, Martina T Caldwell, Stefanie R Ellison","doi":"10.1177/24731242261455680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The United States lags peer nations in infant mortality, with persistent racial and geographic inequities. In Missouri, Black infants experience mortality rates more than double those of White infants. Addressing these disparities requires community-driven interventions beginning before conception and extending beyond routine perinatal care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We describe the development and feasibility of Women & Person-Empowered Community Access for Reproductive Equity (WE CARE)-Jackson County (JC), a reproductive justice-informed intervention adapted from the Detroit WE CARE model to address reproductive health and infant mortality disparities.</p><p><strong>Design/setting: </strong>WE CARE-JC used a two-phase, mixed-methods design. Phase 1 included listening sessions with advocacy groups and reproductive-age women, and a community survey (<i>N</i> = 537) to identify needs, barriers, and engagement strategies. Phase 2 piloted the intervention in a safety-net hospital's emergency department. Intervention components included the \"One Key Question,\" MyPath decision-support tool, community health worker-led counseling, and follow-up care navigation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Listening sessions identified trusted providers as preferred sources of family planning guidance, while stigma, limited provider access, and knowledge gaps were key barriers. Survey data showed social (13% housing, 22% food, and 35% transportation insecurity) and medical (51% comorbid condition) vulnerability. In the pilot, 45 women were enrolled (85% of those approached), of whom 58% scheduled follow-up care and 10 (39%) attended appointments. Feedback from eight attendees showed high acceptability of the MyPath tool, counseling, and navigation support.</p><p><strong>Implications for health equity: </strong>WE CARE-JC demonstrated feasibility and acceptability of a reproductive justice-informed, community-engaged model to reduce barriers and improve equitable access to reproductive health care. This model provides a scalable framework for addressing upstream drivers of infant mortality inequities.</p>","PeriodicalId":36602,"journal":{"name":"Health Equity","volume":"10 ","pages":"24731242261455680"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13428108/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Equity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24731242261455680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The United States lags peer nations in infant mortality, with persistent racial and geographic inequities. In Missouri, Black infants experience mortality rates more than double those of White infants. Addressing these disparities requires community-driven interventions beginning before conception and extending beyond routine perinatal care.

Objectives: We describe the development and feasibility of Women & Person-Empowered Community Access for Reproductive Equity (WE CARE)-Jackson County (JC), a reproductive justice-informed intervention adapted from the Detroit WE CARE model to address reproductive health and infant mortality disparities.

Design/setting: WE CARE-JC used a two-phase, mixed-methods design. Phase 1 included listening sessions with advocacy groups and reproductive-age women, and a community survey (N = 537) to identify needs, barriers, and engagement strategies. Phase 2 piloted the intervention in a safety-net hospital's emergency department. Intervention components included the "One Key Question," MyPath decision-support tool, community health worker-led counseling, and follow-up care navigation.

Results: Listening sessions identified trusted providers as preferred sources of family planning guidance, while stigma, limited provider access, and knowledge gaps were key barriers. Survey data showed social (13% housing, 22% food, and 35% transportation insecurity) and medical (51% comorbid condition) vulnerability. In the pilot, 45 women were enrolled (85% of those approached), of whom 58% scheduled follow-up care and 10 (39%) attended appointments. Feedback from eight attendees showed high acceptability of the MyPath tool, counseling, and navigation support.

Implications for health equity: WE CARE-JC demonstrated feasibility and acceptability of a reproductive justice-informed, community-engaged model to reduce barriers and improve equitable access to reproductive health care. This model provides a scalable framework for addressing upstream drivers of infant mortality inequities.

从底特律到堪萨斯城:调整WE CARE模式以改善母婴健康。
背景:由于种族和地域的不平等,美国在婴儿死亡率方面落后于其他国家。在密苏里州,黑人婴儿的死亡率是白人婴儿的两倍多。解决这些差异需要社区驱动的干预措施,从怀孕前开始,并延伸到常规围产期护理之外。目的:我们描述了杰克逊县(JC)妇女和个人赋权社区生殖平等(We CARE)的发展和可行性,这是一项生殖正义干预措施,改编自底特律We CARE模式,旨在解决生殖健康和婴儿死亡率差距问题。设计/设置:WE CARE-JC采用两阶段混合方法设计。第一阶段包括听取倡导团体和育龄妇女的意见,并进行社区调查(N = 537),以确定需求、障碍和参与策略。第二阶段在一家安全网医院的急诊科试行了干预措施。干预措施包括“一个关键问题”、MyPath决策支持工具、社区卫生工作者主导的咨询和后续护理导航。结果:听取会议确定值得信赖的提供者是计划生育指导的首选来源,而耻辱,有限的提供者获取和知识差距是主要障碍。调查数据显示了社会脆弱性(13%住房不安全,22%食物不安全,35%交通不安全)和医疗脆弱性(51%共病)。在该试点项目中,45名妇女(占接触人数的85%)参加了研究,其中58%安排了后续护理,10名(39%)参加了预约。来自八位与会者的反馈表明,MyPath工具、咨询和导航支持的可接受性很高。对卫生公平的影响:WE care - jc证明了生殖司法知情和社区参与模式的可行性和可接受性,以减少障碍并改善公平获得生殖保健的机会。该模式为解决婴儿死亡率不平等的上游驱动因素提供了一个可扩展的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Equity
Health Equity Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
97
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书