Preceptorship Barriers From the Preceptors' and Preceptees' Lens: A Qualitative Study.

IF 2.5 Q1 NURSING
Nursing Research and Practice Pub Date : 2026-07-30 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/nrp/4391429
Adnan Innab, Juliana Linnette D Sa, Sahar Alshamrani, Salha Alshamari, Amani Awaji, Nawdhaa Alotaibi, Wejdan Shaqiqi
{"title":"Preceptorship Barriers From the Preceptors' and Preceptees' Lens: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Adnan Innab, Juliana Linnette D Sa, Sahar Alshamrani, Salha Alshamari, Amani Awaji, Nawdhaa Alotaibi, Wejdan Shaqiqi","doi":"10.1155/nrp/4391429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preceptorship is a cornerstone of clinical teaching in undergraduate nursing programs in several countries, including Saudi Arabia. However, the common challenges faced by both preceptors and preceptees have not been explored.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the preceptors' and preceptees' perceptions toward barriers faced during preceptorship program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative descriptive design using Braun and Clarke's six-step thematic analysis was adopted, and online semistructured interviews were conducted for each participant from March to June 2022. A purposive sample of 13 participants (eight preceptors and five preceptees) was recruited from hospitals in different regions of Saudi Arabia. To ensure scientific rigor, the study's credibility, confirmability, and transferability were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two major themes emerged: (1) challenges of the preceptorship program (i.e., language barrier, lack of readiness to practice, lack of time, and lack of role preparation and direction and (2) strategies for improving preceptorship programs (i.e., having an organized preceptorship program and having organizational support).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preceptorship plays a vital role in helping nursing students develop clinical knowledge, confidence, and practical skills during their transition into professional practice. This study identified key barriers affecting effective preceptorship, including language challenges, limited readiness for practice, insufficient time, and unclear role preparation for both preceptors and preceptees. Strengthening preceptorship programs through structured organization, adequate staffing, proper preceptor support, and standardized training strategies can enhance clinical learning experiences and improve educational outcomes.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist was followed.</p>","PeriodicalId":46917,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Research and Practice","volume":"2026 ","pages":"4391429"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13424819/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/nrp/4391429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preceptorship is a cornerstone of clinical teaching in undergraduate nursing programs in several countries, including Saudi Arabia. However, the common challenges faced by both preceptors and preceptees have not been explored.

Aim: To explore the preceptors' and preceptees' perceptions toward barriers faced during preceptorship program.

Methods: A qualitative descriptive design using Braun and Clarke's six-step thematic analysis was adopted, and online semistructured interviews were conducted for each participant from March to June 2022. A purposive sample of 13 participants (eight preceptors and five preceptees) was recruited from hospitals in different regions of Saudi Arabia. To ensure scientific rigor, the study's credibility, confirmability, and transferability were determined.

Results: Two major themes emerged: (1) challenges of the preceptorship program (i.e., language barrier, lack of readiness to practice, lack of time, and lack of role preparation and direction and (2) strategies for improving preceptorship programs (i.e., having an organized preceptorship program and having organizational support).

Conclusion: Preceptorship plays a vital role in helping nursing students develop clinical knowledge, confidence, and practical skills during their transition into professional practice. This study identified key barriers affecting effective preceptorship, including language challenges, limited readiness for practice, insufficient time, and unclear role preparation for both preceptors and preceptees. Strengthening preceptorship programs through structured organization, adequate staffing, proper preceptor support, and standardized training strategies can enhance clinical learning experiences and improve educational outcomes.

Reporting method: The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist was followed.

从师徒视角看师徒障碍:一项质的研究。
背景:在包括沙特阿拉伯在内的一些国家,导师制是护理本科临床教学的基石。然而,导师和学员共同面临的挑战并没有被探讨。目的:探讨师徒对师徒培训中遇到的障碍的认知。方法:采用Braun和Clarke的六步主题分析的定性描述设计,于2022年3月至6月对每位参与者进行在线半结构化访谈。从沙特阿拉伯不同地区的医院招募了13名参与者(8名指导员和5名受指导员)。为了确保科学的严谨性,研究的可信性、可确认性和可转移性被确定。结果:出现了两个主要主题:(1)师徒计划的挑战(即语言障碍,缺乏实践准备,缺乏时间,缺乏角色准备和指导);(2)改进师徒计划的策略(即有组织的师徒计划和有组织的支持)。结论:师徒关系对护生临床知识、信心和实践技能的培养起着至关重要的作用。本研究确定了影响有效训导的主要障碍,包括语言挑战、实践准备不足、时间不足以及训导和受训者角色准备不明确。通过结构化的组织、充足的人员配备、适当的领班支持和标准化的培训策略来加强领班计划,可以提高临床学习经验并改善教育成果。报告方法:遵循定性研究综合报告标准清单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书