Assessing Deep Learning in Record Linkage: Recommendations Based on Dataset Characteristics and Computational Costs.

IF 2.2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
International Journal of Population Data Science Pub Date : 2026-07-06 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.23889/ijpds.v11i5.3716
Eric Sartor, Jeremy Foxcroft, Luiza Antonie
{"title":"Assessing Deep Learning in Record Linkage: Recommendations Based on Dataset Characteristics and Computational Costs.","authors":"Eric Sartor, Jeremy Foxcroft, Luiza Antonie","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v11i5.3716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deep learning systems are increasingly being applied to record linkage tasks, addressing either the matching stage or the entire linkage process. Although some deep learning methods appear to outperform classical approaches, they are typically evaluated on specific linkage problems, making wider applicability difficult to assess. Moreover, for any use in practical applications, it is critical to understand the trade-offs between the lift in linkage performance and the increase in computational complexity when using deep learning systems. When do the benefits of deep learning outweigh the costs compared to classical machine learning methods? Our investigations have three main objectives: increase our understanding of the performance of deep learning methods across a wide range of linking tasks, particularly transformer-based methods; measure computational costs; and make recommendations accounting for performance-cost trade-offs. We developed a common and consistent framework to evaluate these trade-offs, which we apply on a large number of deep learning methods tackling a variety of record linkage tasks. Our evaluation covers both structured and unstructured datasets. We present precision-recall curves to better understand the performance of the models. We discuss computational costs for these methods to inform practitioners. Deep learning systems perform very well on unstructured data, while classical machine learning methods with feature engineering remain competitive on structured data at a significantly lower computational cost. This research will provide practical guidance to the practitioners in the data linkage community on linkage method selection based on dataset characteristics and computational costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":36483,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Population Data Science","volume":"11 5","pages":"3716"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13426801/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Population Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v11i5.3716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deep learning systems are increasingly being applied to record linkage tasks, addressing either the matching stage or the entire linkage process. Although some deep learning methods appear to outperform classical approaches, they are typically evaluated on specific linkage problems, making wider applicability difficult to assess. Moreover, for any use in practical applications, it is critical to understand the trade-offs between the lift in linkage performance and the increase in computational complexity when using deep learning systems. When do the benefits of deep learning outweigh the costs compared to classical machine learning methods? Our investigations have three main objectives: increase our understanding of the performance of deep learning methods across a wide range of linking tasks, particularly transformer-based methods; measure computational costs; and make recommendations accounting for performance-cost trade-offs. We developed a common and consistent framework to evaluate these trade-offs, which we apply on a large number of deep learning methods tackling a variety of record linkage tasks. Our evaluation covers both structured and unstructured datasets. We present precision-recall curves to better understand the performance of the models. We discuss computational costs for these methods to inform practitioners. Deep learning systems perform very well on unstructured data, while classical machine learning methods with feature engineering remain competitive on structured data at a significantly lower computational cost. This research will provide practical guidance to the practitioners in the data linkage community on linkage method selection based on dataset characteristics and computational costs.

评估记录链接中的深度学习:基于数据集特征和计算成本的建议。
深度学习系统越来越多地应用于记录链接任务,解决匹配阶段或整个链接过程。尽管一些深度学习方法似乎优于经典方法,但它们通常是在特定的关联问题上进行评估的,这使得更广泛的适用性难以评估。此外,在实际应用中,在使用深度学习系统时,理解链接性能提升和计算复杂性增加之间的权衡是至关重要的。与传统的机器学习方法相比,深度学习的好处何时大于成本?我们的研究有三个主要目标:增加我们对深度学习方法在广泛的链接任务中的性能的理解,特别是基于转换器的方法;测量计算成本;并提出考虑性能成本权衡的建议。我们开发了一个通用且一致的框架来评估这些权衡,我们将其应用于处理各种记录链接任务的大量深度学习方法。我们的评估涵盖了结构化和非结构化数据集。我们提出了精确召回曲线,以便更好地理解模型的性能。我们讨论了这些方法的计算成本,以告知从业者。深度学习系统在非结构化数据上表现非常好,而经典的机器学习方法与特征工程在结构化数据上仍然具有竞争力,且计算成本显著降低。本研究将为数据链接社区的从业者提供基于数据集特征和计算成本的链接方法选择的实践指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
386
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书