Development and internal validation of a clinical prediction model for deep surgical site infection after open extremity fractures: the BIGB2OSS score.
{"title":"Development and internal validation of a clinical prediction model for deep surgical site infection after open extremity fractures: the BIGB<sup>2</sup>OSS score.","authors":"Takahiro Inui, Keisuke Ishii, Takashi Suzuki, Kentaro Matsui, Taketo Kurozumi, Koichi Inokuchi, Yoshinobu Watanabe, Hirotaka Kawano","doi":"10.1007/s00590-026-04901-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Early identification of patients at high risk of deep surgical site infection after open extremity fractures is crucial for timely intervention and improved outcomes. This study aimed to develop and internally validate a clinical prediction model, the BIGB<sup>2</sup>OSS score, for predicting deep surgical site infection within three months of injury using variables easily obtained in early post-injury phase.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study was conducted at two university hospitals in Japan, including 570 consecutive patients with open extremity fractures. Data on 18 candidate predictors were collected in the early post-injury phase. The primary outcome was the occurrence of deep surgical site infection within three months of injury. A backward stepwise logistic regression model was used to build the prediction model. Model performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) and internal validation with bootstrap methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The BIGB<sup>2</sup>OSS score was a 5-point model based on four predictors: BMI ≥ 25 (1 point), Gustilo-Anderson classification IIIA (1 point), Gustilo-Anderson IIIB or IIIC (2 points), OTA-OFC skin = 3 (1 point), and smoking history (1 point). The model showed fair discriminative ability with an AUC of 0.76 (95% CI 0.70-0.83). Internal validation using bootstrap resampling with 1000 repetitions yielded an optimism-adjusted C-statistic of 0.76 (95% CI 0.70-0.83). The estimated probabilities of deep surgical site infection were 2.7% for scores 0-1, 11% for scores 2-3, and 30% for scores 4-5, closely matching the actual prevalence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The BIGB<sup>2</sup>OSS score is a simple clinical prediction model with fair discrimination for deep surgical site infection in patients with open extremity fractures. It uses early post-injury variables and may support timely risk communication and follow-up planning. Further external validation is needed to confirm its utility in diverse clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":50484,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-026-04901-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Early identification of patients at high risk of deep surgical site infection after open extremity fractures is crucial for timely intervention and improved outcomes. This study aimed to develop and internally validate a clinical prediction model, the BIGB2OSS score, for predicting deep surgical site infection within three months of injury using variables easily obtained in early post-injury phase.
Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted at two university hospitals in Japan, including 570 consecutive patients with open extremity fractures. Data on 18 candidate predictors were collected in the early post-injury phase. The primary outcome was the occurrence of deep surgical site infection within three months of injury. A backward stepwise logistic regression model was used to build the prediction model. Model performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) and internal validation with bootstrap methods.
Results: The BIGB2OSS score was a 5-point model based on four predictors: BMI ≥ 25 (1 point), Gustilo-Anderson classification IIIA (1 point), Gustilo-Anderson IIIB or IIIC (2 points), OTA-OFC skin = 3 (1 point), and smoking history (1 point). The model showed fair discriminative ability with an AUC of 0.76 (95% CI 0.70-0.83). Internal validation using bootstrap resampling with 1000 repetitions yielded an optimism-adjusted C-statistic of 0.76 (95% CI 0.70-0.83). The estimated probabilities of deep surgical site infection were 2.7% for scores 0-1, 11% for scores 2-3, and 30% for scores 4-5, closely matching the actual prevalence.
Conclusion: The BIGB2OSS score is a simple clinical prediction model with fair discrimination for deep surgical site infection in patients with open extremity fractures. It uses early post-injury variables and may support timely risk communication and follow-up planning. Further external validation is needed to confirm its utility in diverse clinical settings.
早期识别开放性肢体骨折后深部手术部位感染高危患者对于及时干预和改善预后至关重要。本研究旨在开发并内部验证一种临床预测模型,即BIGB2OSS评分,利用损伤后早期阶段容易获得的变量预测损伤后3个月内深部手术部位感染。方法:在日本两所大学医院进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,包括570例连续的开放性四肢骨折患者。在损伤后早期阶段收集了18个候选预测因子的数据。主要观察结果为术后3个月内深部手术部位感染的发生情况。采用后向逐步logistic回归模型建立预测模型。使用曲线下面积(AUC)和bootstrap方法进行内部验证来评估模型性能。结果:BIGB2OSS评分是一个基于四个预测因素的5分模型:BMI≥25(1分),Gustilo-Anderson分类IIIA(1分),Gustilo-Anderson IIIB或IIIC(2分),ta - ofc皮肤= 3(1分)和吸烟史(1分)。该模型具有良好的判别能力,AUC为0.76 (95% CI 0.70-0.83)。使用1000次重复的自举重采样进行内部验证,得到了0.76的乐观校正c统计量(95% CI 0.70-0.83)。0-1分深度手术部位感染的估计概率为2.7%,2-3分为11%,4-5分为30%,与实际患病率非常吻合。结论:BIGB2OSS评分是一种简便的临床预测模型,对开放性肢体骨折患者深部手术部位感染具有公平的判别性。它使用损伤后早期变量,可能支持及时的风险沟通和后续计划。需要进一步的外部验证来确认其在不同临床环境中的效用。
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (EJOST) aims to publish high quality Orthopedic scientific work. The objective of our journal is to disseminate meaningful, impactful, clinically relevant work from each and every region of the world, that has the potential to change and or inform clinical practice.