Commoning, heterotopia, and transformation: An analytical framework for and from contested spaces.

IF 3.1 1区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Environment and Planning D-Society & Space Pub Date : 2025-09-10 eCollection Date: 2026-08-01 DOI:10.1177/02637758251361706
Amy R Poteete, Pavel Kunysz, Nik Luka
{"title":"Commoning, heterotopia, and transformation: An analytical framework for and from contested spaces.","authors":"Amy R Poteete, Pavel Kunysz, Nik Luka","doi":"10.1177/02637758251361706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Commoning occurs when people recognize that they share something and develop a sense of mutuality toward each other along with a shared responsibility for whatever they share. Because sharing and mutuality contrast with the individualism, competitiveness, and profit orientation of contemporary capitalist societies, commoning is widely heralded for its transformative potential. Nonetheless, commoning is not inherently transformative. We argue that whether commoning supports transformation depends on its relationship with heterotopic processes. Both commoning and heterotopia-ideal typical \"other\" spaces characterized by looseness and denormalization-present alternatives to hegemonic norms, especially those of state-centricity, hierarchical social organization, and the prioritization of market relationships and economic growth, but they are distinct processes that do not necessarily coincide. We propose an analytical framework to guide analysis of the relationship between commoning and heterotopia and illustrate it with examples from contested urban green spaces in Liège (Belgium), Montréal (Canada), and Brussels (Belgium).</p>","PeriodicalId":48303,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Planning D-Society & Space","volume":"44 4","pages":"570-590"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13427086/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Planning D-Society & Space","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02637758251361706","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Commoning occurs when people recognize that they share something and develop a sense of mutuality toward each other along with a shared responsibility for whatever they share. Because sharing and mutuality contrast with the individualism, competitiveness, and profit orientation of contemporary capitalist societies, commoning is widely heralded for its transformative potential. Nonetheless, commoning is not inherently transformative. We argue that whether commoning supports transformation depends on its relationship with heterotopic processes. Both commoning and heterotopia-ideal typical "other" spaces characterized by looseness and denormalization-present alternatives to hegemonic norms, especially those of state-centricity, hierarchical social organization, and the prioritization of market relationships and economic growth, but they are distinct processes that do not necessarily coincide. We propose an analytical framework to guide analysis of the relationship between commoning and heterotopia and illustrate it with examples from contested urban green spaces in Liège (Belgium), Montréal (Canada), and Brussels (Belgium).

共同性、异托邦与转型:争议空间的分析框架。
当人们认识到他们有共同的东西,并对彼此产生一种相互感,以及对他们所共享的东西承担共同的责任时,共同就发生了。由于共享和互惠与当代资本主义社会的个人主义、竞争和利润取向形成鲜明对比,共同性因其变革潜力而被广泛宣传。尽管如此,普通化本身并不具有变革性。我们认为共容是否支持转换取决于其与异位过程的关系。共同和异托邦——理想的典型“他者”空间,以松散和非规范化为特征——都提供了霸权规范的替代方案,特别是那些国家中心、等级制社会组织、市场关系和经济增长的优先次序,但它们是不同的过程,不一定重合。我们提出了一个分析框架,以指导对共同和异托邦之间关系的分析,并以比利时利弗里奇、加拿大蒙特里萨和比利时布鲁塞尔的城市绿地竞争为例加以说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: EPD: Society and Space is an international, interdisciplinary scholarly and political project. Through both a peer reviewed journal and an editor reviewed companion website, we publish articles, essays, interviews, forums, and book reviews that examine social struggles over access to and control of space, place, territory, region, and resources. We seek contributions that investigate and challenge the ways that modes and systems of power, difference and oppression differentially shape lives, and how those modes and systems are resisted, subverted and reworked. We welcome work that is empirically engaged and furthers a range of critical epistemological approaches, that pushes conceptual boundaries and puts theory to work in innovative ways, and that consciously navigates the fraught politics of knowledge production within and beyond the academy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书