L Svobodova, L Valkova, M Kolarikova, K Kejlova, R Bajgar, K Barton Tomankova, M Rucki, H Bendova, D Jirova, H Kolarova
{"title":"Toxicological evaluation in vitro of novel photosensitizers intended for photodynamic therapy.","authors":"L Svobodova, L Valkova, M Kolarikova, K Kejlova, R Bajgar, K Barton Tomankova, M Rucki, H Bendova, D Jirova, H Kolarova","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2026.106205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three selected photosensitizers (PS) with potential applications in PDT (ZnPcS<sub>2</sub>, TMPyP, PPIX) were evaluated for skin irritation, phototoxicity and sensitization using exclusively non-animal test methods. The experimental approach was based on OECD TG with protocol modifications to accommodate the specific requirements of photosensitizers testing. Reconstructed human epidermis (RhE) based assays were performed using adapted protocols derived from OECD TG 439 and OECD TG 498, while skin sensitization was assessed using methods based on OECD TG 442C and OECD TG 442D. TMPyP and PPIX showed no evidence of skin irritation, phototoxicity, early skin inflammation, or skin sensitization under the experimental conditions. In contrast, ZnPcS<sub>2</sub> at higher concentrations (50 and 100 μM) induced a phototoxic response following 18 h exposure of the RhE skin model EpiDerm™ and subsequent red light irradiation (2 × 75 J cm<sup>-2</sup>). Importantly, despite its phototoxic activity, ZnPcS<sub>2</sub> did not induce skin irritation, sensitization, or increase of inflammatory biomarkers associated with early skin inflammation. Overall, the investigated photosensitizers were well tolerated in the applied non-animal test systems. These findings demonstrated the suitability of OECD TG-derived methods with protocol adaptations for preclinical safety assessment of PS under conditions relevant to PDT and supported their further development for biomedical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"106205"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2026.106205","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Three selected photosensitizers (PS) with potential applications in PDT (ZnPcS2, TMPyP, PPIX) were evaluated for skin irritation, phototoxicity and sensitization using exclusively non-animal test methods. The experimental approach was based on OECD TG with protocol modifications to accommodate the specific requirements of photosensitizers testing. Reconstructed human epidermis (RhE) based assays were performed using adapted protocols derived from OECD TG 439 and OECD TG 498, while skin sensitization was assessed using methods based on OECD TG 442C and OECD TG 442D. TMPyP and PPIX showed no evidence of skin irritation, phototoxicity, early skin inflammation, or skin sensitization under the experimental conditions. In contrast, ZnPcS2 at higher concentrations (50 and 100 μM) induced a phototoxic response following 18 h exposure of the RhE skin model EpiDerm™ and subsequent red light irradiation (2 × 75 J cm-2). Importantly, despite its phototoxic activity, ZnPcS2 did not induce skin irritation, sensitization, or increase of inflammatory biomarkers associated with early skin inflammation. Overall, the investigated photosensitizers were well tolerated in the applied non-animal test systems. These findings demonstrated the suitability of OECD TG-derived methods with protocol adaptations for preclinical safety assessment of PS under conditions relevant to PDT and supported their further development for biomedical applications.
期刊介绍:
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health.
Types of peer-reviewed articles published:
-Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to:
1.Factors influencing human sensitivity
2.Exposure science related to risk assessment
3.Alternative toxicological test methods
4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations
5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies
6.Read-across methods and evaluations
-Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues
-Letters to the Editor
-Guest Editorials (by Invitation)