Toxicological evaluation in vitro of novel photosensitizers intended for photodynamic therapy.

IF 4.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology Pub Date : 2026-12-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2026.106205
L Svobodova, L Valkova, M Kolarikova, K Kejlova, R Bajgar, K Barton Tomankova, M Rucki, H Bendova, D Jirova, H Kolarova
{"title":"Toxicological evaluation in vitro of novel photosensitizers intended for photodynamic therapy.","authors":"L Svobodova, L Valkova, M Kolarikova, K Kejlova, R Bajgar, K Barton Tomankova, M Rucki, H Bendova, D Jirova, H Kolarova","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2026.106205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three selected photosensitizers (PS) with potential applications in PDT (ZnPcS<sub>2</sub>, TMPyP, PPIX) were evaluated for skin irritation, phototoxicity and sensitization using exclusively non-animal test methods. The experimental approach was based on OECD TG with protocol modifications to accommodate the specific requirements of photosensitizers testing. Reconstructed human epidermis (RhE) based assays were performed using adapted protocols derived from OECD TG 439 and OECD TG 498, while skin sensitization was assessed using methods based on OECD TG 442C and OECD TG 442D. TMPyP and PPIX showed no evidence of skin irritation, phototoxicity, early skin inflammation, or skin sensitization under the experimental conditions. In contrast, ZnPcS<sub>2</sub> at higher concentrations (50 and 100 μM) induced a phototoxic response following 18 h exposure of the RhE skin model EpiDerm™ and subsequent red light irradiation (2 × 75 J cm<sup>-2</sup>). Importantly, despite its phototoxic activity, ZnPcS<sub>2</sub> did not induce skin irritation, sensitization, or increase of inflammatory biomarkers associated with early skin inflammation. Overall, the investigated photosensitizers were well tolerated in the applied non-animal test systems. These findings demonstrated the suitability of OECD TG-derived methods with protocol adaptations for preclinical safety assessment of PS under conditions relevant to PDT and supported their further development for biomedical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"106205"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2026.106205","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Three selected photosensitizers (PS) with potential applications in PDT (ZnPcS2, TMPyP, PPIX) were evaluated for skin irritation, phototoxicity and sensitization using exclusively non-animal test methods. The experimental approach was based on OECD TG with protocol modifications to accommodate the specific requirements of photosensitizers testing. Reconstructed human epidermis (RhE) based assays were performed using adapted protocols derived from OECD TG 439 and OECD TG 498, while skin sensitization was assessed using methods based on OECD TG 442C and OECD TG 442D. TMPyP and PPIX showed no evidence of skin irritation, phototoxicity, early skin inflammation, or skin sensitization under the experimental conditions. In contrast, ZnPcS2 at higher concentrations (50 and 100 μM) induced a phototoxic response following 18 h exposure of the RhE skin model EpiDerm™ and subsequent red light irradiation (2 × 75 J cm-2). Importantly, despite its phototoxic activity, ZnPcS2 did not induce skin irritation, sensitization, or increase of inflammatory biomarkers associated with early skin inflammation. Overall, the investigated photosensitizers were well tolerated in the applied non-animal test systems. These findings demonstrated the suitability of OECD TG-derived methods with protocol adaptations for preclinical safety assessment of PS under conditions relevant to PDT and supported their further development for biomedical applications.

用于光动力治疗的新型光敏剂的体外毒理学评价。
选择三种光敏剂(ZnPcS2, TMPyP, PPIX)在PDT中有潜在的应用,采用非动物实验方法评估其皮肤刺激、光毒性和致敏性。实验方法基于OECD TG,并修改了协议,以适应光敏剂测试的特定要求。基于重建人类表皮(RhE)的检测采用源自OECD TG 439和OECD TG 498的改编方案,而皮肤致敏性采用基于OECD TG 442C和OECD TG 442D的方法进行评估。在实验条件下,TMPyP和PPIX没有显示皮肤刺激、光毒性、早期皮肤炎症或皮肤致敏的证据。相比之下,较高浓度(50 μM和100 μM)的ZnPcS2在RhE皮肤模型EpiDerm™暴露18 h后,随后的红光照射(2x75 J.cm-2)诱导光毒性反应。重要的是,尽管ZnPcS2具有光毒性,但它不会引起皮肤刺激、致敏或与早期皮肤炎症相关的炎症生物标志物的增加。总的来说,所研究的光敏剂在应用的非动物试验系统中耐受性良好。这些发现证明了经合组织tg衍生方法在PDT相关条件下对PS临床前安全性评估的适用性,并支持其进一步发展用于生物医学应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
147
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health. Types of peer-reviewed articles published: -Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to: 1.Factors influencing human sensitivity 2.Exposure science related to risk assessment 3.Alternative toxicological test methods 4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations 5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies 6.Read-across methods and evaluations -Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues -Letters to the Editor -Guest Editorials (by Invitation)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书