Harmonizing French and German administrative DADS-EDP and SIAB data - A practical guide on how to create comparable data sets on maternal employment.

IF 2.2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
International Journal of Population Data Science Pub Date : 2026-07-06 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.23889/ijpds.v11i5.3717
Andreas Filser, Pascal Achard, Inga Amend, Corinna Frodermann, Ida Gaede, Sander Wagner
{"title":"Harmonizing French and German administrative DADS-EDP and SIAB data - A practical guide on how to create comparable data sets on maternal employment.","authors":"Andreas Filser, Pascal Achard, Inga Amend, Corinna Frodermann, Ida Gaede, Sander Wagner","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v11i5.3717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Administrative data is increasingly used in social science research, including for studying the labour market consequences of motherhood. Yet despite the growing use of such data within countries, cross-national comparative research remains limited because administrative data require substantial harmonisation before meaningful comparisons are possible. In this paper, we harmonise two rich administrative data sets suitable for comparative research on maternal employment: the French DADS-EDP and the German SIAB. Both data sets are based on social security records, span several decades, include detailed employment histories linked to firm-level data, and are accessible to the scientific community. France and Germany present a compelling case for comparison on maternal employment, given that both countries have followed different policy paths regarding childcare and norms around maternal employment. We illustrate the potential of the harmonised data by showing how maternal employment trajectories evolve over time in France, West Germany, and East Germany. Our results reveal sharp employment declines after childbirth in all three regions, but with significant variation in magnitude and recovery. French mothers experience relatively modest declines, while German mothers, especially in West Germany, face steeper short-term drops and slower recoveries. Over successive cohorts, employment penalties shrink in all three regions, with particularly marked decreases in Germany following the 2007 parental leave reform - notwithstanding continued differences between East and West Germany. These findings highlight the value of harmonised administrative data for understanding maternal employment in a comparative perspective against the background of policy reforms and enduring regional differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":36483,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Population Data Science","volume":"11 5","pages":"3717"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13426682/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Population Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v11i5.3717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Administrative data is increasingly used in social science research, including for studying the labour market consequences of motherhood. Yet despite the growing use of such data within countries, cross-national comparative research remains limited because administrative data require substantial harmonisation before meaningful comparisons are possible. In this paper, we harmonise two rich administrative data sets suitable for comparative research on maternal employment: the French DADS-EDP and the German SIAB. Both data sets are based on social security records, span several decades, include detailed employment histories linked to firm-level data, and are accessible to the scientific community. France and Germany present a compelling case for comparison on maternal employment, given that both countries have followed different policy paths regarding childcare and norms around maternal employment. We illustrate the potential of the harmonised data by showing how maternal employment trajectories evolve over time in France, West Germany, and East Germany. Our results reveal sharp employment declines after childbirth in all three regions, but with significant variation in magnitude and recovery. French mothers experience relatively modest declines, while German mothers, especially in West Germany, face steeper short-term drops and slower recoveries. Over successive cohorts, employment penalties shrink in all three regions, with particularly marked decreases in Germany following the 2007 parental leave reform - notwithstanding continued differences between East and West Germany. These findings highlight the value of harmonised administrative data for understanding maternal employment in a comparative perspective against the background of policy reforms and enduring regional differences.

协调法国和德国的行政DADS-EDP和SIAB数据-关于如何创建可比较的产妇就业数据集的实用指南。
行政数据越来越多地用于社会科学研究,包括研究母性对劳动力市场的影响。然而,尽管各国越来越多地使用这种数据,但跨国比较研究仍然有限,因为行政数据需要大量协调才能进行有意义的比较。在本文中,我们协调了两个丰富的行政数据集,适用于产妇就业的比较研究:法国的DADS-EDP和德国的SIAB。这两个数据集都是基于社会保障记录,跨度长达几十年,包括与公司层面数据相关的详细就业历史,并可供科学界访问。考虑到法国和德国在儿童保育和孕产妇就业规范方面采取了不同的政策路径,两国在孕产妇就业方面的比较是一个令人信服的案例。我们通过展示法国、西德和东德的母亲就业轨迹如何随时间演变来说明协调数据的潜力。我们的研究结果显示,在所有三个地区,分娩后就业急剧下降,但在幅度和恢复方面存在显著差异。法国妈妈们经历了相对温和的下降,而德国妈妈们,尤其是西德的妈妈们,面临着短期急剧下降和缓慢复苏。在连续的研究中,所有三个地区的就业处罚都有所减少,德国在2007年育儿假改革后的减少尤为显著——尽管东德和西德之间存在持续的差异。这些发现突出了在政策改革和持续的区域差异背景下,从比较的角度了解产妇就业的统一行政数据的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
386
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书