Public understanding of palliative care and preferences for place of end-of-life care and death: A national population-based latent class analysis.

IF 2.7 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative Care and Social Practice Pub Date : 2026-07-29 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26323524261474030
Cecilia Larsdotter, Stina Nyblom, Henrik Imberg, Richard Sawatzky, Joakim Öhlén
{"title":"Public understanding of palliative care and preferences for place of end-of-life care and death: A national population-based latent class analysis.","authors":"Cecilia Larsdotter, Stina Nyblom, Henrik Imberg, Richard Sawatzky, Joakim Öhlén","doi":"10.1177/26323524261474030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dying in the preferred place is associated with improved wellbeing. Preferences may be shaped by personal characteristics, health, prior experiences, and understanding of palliative care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate preferences for place of end-of-life care and death in the Swedish adult population and specifically, to identify subgroups characterised by different understanding of palliative care and examine how preferences vary across these subgroups.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study was based on a cross-sectional population-level survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A simple random sample of 3,750 16-90-year-old individuals, selected from the Swedish Population Register. Latent class analysis identified distinct subgroups based on participants' understanding of palliative care. Predictors of subgroup membership were examined using multinomial logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,752 individuals responded (48%). Of them, 59.6% preferred end-of-life care at home, and 54.2% preferred home death. Latent Class Analysis identified five distinct subgroups: comprehensive understanding, some understanding, limited understanding, misunderstanding, and no opinion. Comprehensive understanding, such as believing that palliative care supports families and alleviates suffering, was associated with preferences for home or hospice care. Misunderstanding, such as believing that palliative care hastens death, was associated with preferences for hospital or nursing home. The comprehensive understanding group included more women (57.6%), older (mean [SD] age: 57 [18] years), and university-educated individuals (48.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the most preferred place for both care and death were home, preferences varied across subgroups defined by differing levels of understanding of palliative care and sociodemographic characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":36693,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","volume":"20 ","pages":"26323524261474030"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13424512/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524261474030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dying in the preferred place is associated with improved wellbeing. Preferences may be shaped by personal characteristics, health, prior experiences, and understanding of palliative care.

Objectives: To investigate preferences for place of end-of-life care and death in the Swedish adult population and specifically, to identify subgroups characterised by different understanding of palliative care and examine how preferences vary across these subgroups.

Design: This study was based on a cross-sectional population-level survey.

Methods: A simple random sample of 3,750 16-90-year-old individuals, selected from the Swedish Population Register. Latent class analysis identified distinct subgroups based on participants' understanding of palliative care. Predictors of subgroup membership were examined using multinomial logistic regression.

Results: A total of 1,752 individuals responded (48%). Of them, 59.6% preferred end-of-life care at home, and 54.2% preferred home death. Latent Class Analysis identified five distinct subgroups: comprehensive understanding, some understanding, limited understanding, misunderstanding, and no opinion. Comprehensive understanding, such as believing that palliative care supports families and alleviates suffering, was associated with preferences for home or hospice care. Misunderstanding, such as believing that palliative care hastens death, was associated with preferences for hospital or nursing home. The comprehensive understanding group included more women (57.6%), older (mean [SD] age: 57 [18] years), and university-educated individuals (48.2%).

Conclusion: Although the most preferred place for both care and death were home, preferences varied across subgroups defined by differing levels of understanding of palliative care and sociodemographic characteristics.

公众对姑息治疗的理解和对临终关怀和死亡地点的偏好:一项基于全国人口的潜在分类分析。
背景:在自己喜欢的地方死去与幸福感的提高有关。偏好可能受个人特征、健康状况、先前经验和对姑息治疗的理解的影响。目的:调查瑞典成年人对临终关怀和死亡地点的偏好,特别是确定对姑息治疗有不同理解的亚组,并检查这些亚组之间的偏好如何变化。设计:本研究基于横断面人口水平调查。方法:从瑞典人口登记册中抽取3750名16-90岁的简单随机样本。潜在分类分析根据参与者对姑息治疗的理解确定了不同的亚组。亚群隶属度的预测因子采用多项逻辑回归进行检验。结果:共有1752人回应(48%)。其中,59.6%的人倾向于在家中进行临终护理,54.2%的人倾向于在家中死亡。潜在类分析确定了五个不同的亚组:全面理解,一些理解,有限理解,误解和没有意见。全面的理解,例如相信姑息治疗支持家庭和减轻痛苦,与家庭或临终关怀的偏好有关。误解,例如认为姑息治疗会加速死亡,与对医院或养老院的偏好有关。全面理解组包括更多的女性(57.6%)、老年人(平均[SD]年龄:57岁)和受过大学教育的个体(48.2%)。结论:尽管最喜欢的护理和死亡地点都是家,但由于对姑息治疗和社会人口学特征的理解水平不同,不同亚组的偏好有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative Care and Social Practice
Palliative Care and Social Practice Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书