The influence of ethnic name characteristics on string similarities when linking large heterogeneous population databases.

IF 2.2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
International Journal of Population Data Science Pub Date : 2026-07-06 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.23889/ijpds.v11i5.3756
Yashithi Dharmawimala, Peter Christen, Sumayya Ziyad, Anushka Vidanage, Joseph Lam, Rainer Schnell
{"title":"The influence of ethnic name characteristics on string similarities when linking large heterogeneous population databases.","authors":"Yashithi Dharmawimala, Peter Christen, Sumayya Ziyad, Anushka Vidanage, Joseph Lam, Rainer Schnell","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v11i5.3756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Comparing names is at the core of many data linkage applications. Names can be recorded with variations and errors (typographical, phonetic, or scanning, depending on how names have been captured). Furthermore, names can change over time. Therefore, approximate string comparison functions are commonly employed to calculate similarities between names. There are many such comparison functions, with popular ones including Jaro-Winkler, edit distance, and q-gram based techniques. Which ones are suitable for a given data linkage application is a topic that has not been explored in much detail. Selecting a suitable string comparison function is, however, crucial in the context of bias and fairness when linking population databases that can contain ethnically diverse names, as recent research has shown (for example, see Lam et al,. IPDLN 2024).In this work, we investigate the following question: Do different string comparison functions result in different levels of bias when names from different ethnic groups are being compared? We conducted extensive experiments on a large public population database where the ethnicity of each record is available. By comparing name variations of the same person using multiple string comparison functions, we show that some of these functions exhibit larger similarity ranges than others, while very different similarities are obtained for the same name pair depending upon which comparison function is employed. Our results provide important insights into how practical data linkage of large population-level databases should be conducted in order to limit linkage bias with regard to ethnic groups by employing suitable string comparison functions.</p>","PeriodicalId":36483,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Population Data Science","volume":"11 5","pages":"3756"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13426649/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Population Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v11i5.3756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Comparing names is at the core of many data linkage applications. Names can be recorded with variations and errors (typographical, phonetic, or scanning, depending on how names have been captured). Furthermore, names can change over time. Therefore, approximate string comparison functions are commonly employed to calculate similarities between names. There are many such comparison functions, with popular ones including Jaro-Winkler, edit distance, and q-gram based techniques. Which ones are suitable for a given data linkage application is a topic that has not been explored in much detail. Selecting a suitable string comparison function is, however, crucial in the context of bias and fairness when linking population databases that can contain ethnically diverse names, as recent research has shown (for example, see Lam et al,. IPDLN 2024).In this work, we investigate the following question: Do different string comparison functions result in different levels of bias when names from different ethnic groups are being compared? We conducted extensive experiments on a large public population database where the ethnicity of each record is available. By comparing name variations of the same person using multiple string comparison functions, we show that some of these functions exhibit larger similarity ranges than others, while very different similarities are obtained for the same name pair depending upon which comparison function is employed. Our results provide important insights into how practical data linkage of large population-level databases should be conducted in order to limit linkage bias with regard to ethnic groups by employing suitable string comparison functions.

大型异质人口数据库连接时民族名称特征对字符串相似度的影响。
比较名称是许多数据链接应用程序的核心。名字可能会有变化和错误(排版、语音或扫描,这取决于名字是如何被捕获的)。此外,名字可以随着时间的推移而改变。因此,通常使用近似字符串比较函数来计算名称之间的相似度。有许多这样的比较函数,其中比较流行的包括Jaro-Winkler、编辑距离和基于q-gram的技术。哪些选项适合给定的数据链接应用程序,这是一个尚未详细探讨的主题。然而,正如最近的研究所表明的那样,在连接可能包含不同种族名称的人口数据库时,选择合适的字符串比较函数在偏见和公平的背景下是至关重要的(例如,参见Lam等人)。IPDLN 2024)。在这项工作中,我们研究了以下问题:当来自不同民族的名字被比较时,不同的字符串比较函数是否会导致不同程度的偏差?我们在一个大型公共人口数据库中进行了广泛的实验,其中每个记录的种族都是可用的。通过使用多个字符串比较函数比较同一个人的姓名变化,我们发现其中一些函数比其他函数具有更大的相似性范围,而对于相同的姓名对,根据使用的比较函数的不同,获得的相似性非常不同。我们的研究结果提供了重要的见解,说明应该如何进行大型人口级数据库的实际数据链接,以便通过使用合适的字符串比较函数来限制关于种族群体的链接偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
386
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书