FGF/FGFR Alteration Type as a Candidate Enrichment Biomarker for Gunagratinib in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer: An Exploratory Analysis of Two Early-Phase Trials.

IF 5.1 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Targeted Oncology Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-02 DOI:10.1007/s11523-026-01243-y
Liqiong Xue, Guopei Zhu, Peiguo Wang, Kunyu Yang, Yan Sun, Weidong Li, Zhendong Li, Cuihong Jiang, Qingqing Cai, Meiyu Fang, Man Hu, Minghua Ge, Wei Zhou, Sichen Li, Ye Guo
{"title":"FGF/FGFR Alteration Type as a Candidate Enrichment Biomarker for Gunagratinib in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer: An Exploratory Analysis of Two Early-Phase Trials.","authors":"Liqiong Xue, Guopei Zhu, Peiguo Wang, Kunyu Yang, Yan Sun, Weidong Li, Zhendong Li, Cuihong Jiang, Qingqing Cai, Meiyu Fang, Man Hu, Minghua Ge, Wei Zhou, Sichen Li, Ye Guo","doi":"10.1007/s11523-026-01243-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>FGF/FGFR alterations are recurrent but heterogeneous in head and neck cancer, and which types predict benefit from selective fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibition is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We examined whether response to gunagratinib, a pan-FGFR1-4 inhibitor, differs by FGF/FGFR alteration type in recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer and fibroblast growth factor(FGF)/FGFR alterations treated with gunagratinib in two prospective trials were combined (phase I ICP-CL-00301, n = 10; phase IIa ICP-CL-00304 at the recommended phase II dose [RP2D] of 20 mg once daily, n = 27). Confirmed objective response rate (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours [RECIST] Version 1.1, investigator assessed) was the primary endpoint. Exploratory analyses examined efficacy by alteration type, with an RP2D sensitivity analysis and post-hoc CCND1 outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 37 patients (23 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, 9 nasopharyngeal carcinoma, 5 other; 78.4% with three or more prior therapy lines), confirmed the objective response rate at the RP2D (n = 27) was 7.4% (95% confidence interval 0.9-24.3) and disease control rate 55.6%, with no responses among FGFR-mutant patients (0/6) and single responses among fusions (1/2) and amplifications (1/6). In the pooled cohort (N = 37, including ten treated at sub-RP2D doses), objective response rate was 13.5% (95% confidence interval 4.5-28.8), disease control rate 56.8%, median progression-free survival 4.1 months, median duration of response 11.0 months and median overall survival 7.4 months. Four of five responses arose in receptor-level FGFR alterations rather than FGF3/4/19 amplification alone; because both mutation responses occurred at sub-RP2D doses, this pattern is hypothesis generating. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 35.1%, most commonly hyperphosphataemia; no treatment-related deaths occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At the RP2D, gunagratinib monotherapy had limited activity (0/6 among FGFR-mutant tumours). In the pooled cohort, confirmed responses concentrated among FGFR receptor-level alterations rather than the FGF3/4/19-amplified majority; because part of this signal came from sub-RP2D dosing, alteration type is a candidate enrichment criterion requiring prospective RP2D testing.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03758664 (registered 29 November, 2018) and NCT05372120 (registered 12 May, 2022, retrospectively).</p>","PeriodicalId":22195,"journal":{"name":"Targeted Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"735-748"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Targeted Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-026-01243-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: FGF/FGFR alterations are recurrent but heterogeneous in head and neck cancer, and which types predict benefit from selective fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibition is unknown.

Objective: We examined whether response to gunagratinib, a pan-FGFR1-4 inhibitor, differs by FGF/FGFR alteration type in recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer.

Methods: Patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer and fibroblast growth factor(FGF)/FGFR alterations treated with gunagratinib in two prospective trials were combined (phase I ICP-CL-00301, n = 10; phase IIa ICP-CL-00304 at the recommended phase II dose [RP2D] of 20 mg once daily, n = 27). Confirmed objective response rate (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours [RECIST] Version 1.1, investigator assessed) was the primary endpoint. Exploratory analyses examined efficacy by alteration type, with an RP2D sensitivity analysis and post-hoc CCND1 outcomes.

Results: Among 37 patients (23 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, 9 nasopharyngeal carcinoma, 5 other; 78.4% with three or more prior therapy lines), confirmed the objective response rate at the RP2D (n = 27) was 7.4% (95% confidence interval 0.9-24.3) and disease control rate 55.6%, with no responses among FGFR-mutant patients (0/6) and single responses among fusions (1/2) and amplifications (1/6). In the pooled cohort (N = 37, including ten treated at sub-RP2D doses), objective response rate was 13.5% (95% confidence interval 4.5-28.8), disease control rate 56.8%, median progression-free survival 4.1 months, median duration of response 11.0 months and median overall survival 7.4 months. Four of five responses arose in receptor-level FGFR alterations rather than FGF3/4/19 amplification alone; because both mutation responses occurred at sub-RP2D doses, this pattern is hypothesis generating. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 35.1%, most commonly hyperphosphataemia; no treatment-related deaths occurred.

Conclusions: At the RP2D, gunagratinib monotherapy had limited activity (0/6 among FGFR-mutant tumours). In the pooled cohort, confirmed responses concentrated among FGFR receptor-level alterations rather than the FGF3/4/19-amplified majority; because part of this signal came from sub-RP2D dosing, alteration type is a candidate enrichment criterion requiring prospective RP2D testing.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03758664 (registered 29 November, 2018) and NCT05372120 (registered 12 May, 2022, retrospectively).

FGF/FGFR改变型作为古纳格拉替尼在复发或转移性头颈癌中的候选富集生物标志物:两项早期试验的探索性分析
背景:头颈癌中FGF/FGFR的改变是复发性的,但具有异质性,目前尚不清楚哪种类型的改变能从选择性成纤维细胞生长因子受体(FGFR)抑制中获益。目的:我们研究了在复发或转移性头颈癌中,FGF/FGFR改变类型对泛fgfr1 -4抑制剂gunagratinib的反应是否不同。方法:在两项前瞻性试验中,使用gunagratinib治疗复发或转移性头颈癌和成纤维细胞生长因子(FGF)/FGFR改变的患者进行联合治疗(I期ICP-CL-00301, n = 10; IIa期ICP-CL-00304,推荐II期剂量[RP2D] 20mg,每日1次,n = 27)。确定的客观缓解率(实体肿瘤反应评价标准[RECIST] 1.1版,研究者评估)是主要终点。探索性分析通过改变类型、RP2D敏感性分析和事后CCND1结果来检验疗效。结果:37例患者(头颈部鳞状细胞癌23例,鼻咽癌9例,其他5例;78.4%既往有3种或3种以上治疗方案),证实RP2D的客观缓解率(n = 27)为7.4%(95%置信区间0.9-24.3),疾病控制率为55.6%,fgfr突变患者无应答(0/6),融合(1/2)和扩增(1/6)中有单一应答。在合并队列中(N = 37,包括10例亚rp2d剂量治疗),客观缓解率为13.5%(95%置信区间4.5-28.8),疾病控制率为56.8%,中位无进展生存期4.1个月,中位缓解持续时间11.0个月,中位总生存期7.4个月。5个应答中有4个发生在受体水平的FGFR改变,而不是单纯的FGF3/4/19扩增;因为这两种突变反应都发生在低于rp2d的剂量下,所以这种模式是假设产生的。≥3级治疗相关不良事件发生率为35.1%,最常见的是高磷血症;无治疗相关死亡发生。结论:在RP2D中,单药古那格拉替尼的活性有限(在fgfr突变肿瘤中为0/6)。在合并队列中,确认的应答集中在FGFR受体水平的改变中,而不是fgf3 /4/19扩增的大多数;由于该信号部分来自亚RP2D剂量,因此蚀变类型是需要进行前瞻性RP2D测试的候选富集标准。临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03758664(2018年11月29日注册)和NCT05372120(回顾性注册,2022年5月12日注册)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Targeted Oncology
Targeted Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
64
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Targeted Oncology addresses physicians and scientists committed to oncology and cancer research by providing a programme of articles on molecularly targeted pharmacotherapy in oncology. The journal includes: Original Research Articles on all aspects of molecularly targeted agents for the treatment of cancer, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and related approaches. Comprehensive narrative Review Articles and shorter Leading Articles discussing relevant clinically established as well as emerging agents and pathways. Current Opinion articles that place interesting areas in perspective. Therapy in Practice articles that provide a guide to the optimum management of a condition and highlight practical, clinically relevant considerations and recommendations. Systematic Reviews that use explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement. Adis Drug Reviews of the properties and place in therapy of both newer and established targeted drugs in oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书