Tertiary lymphoid structure transcriptomic signatures show limited and cohort-dependent value for predicting axillary nodal involvement in oestrogen receptor-positive luminal breast cancer.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Anti-Cancer Drugs Pub Date : 2026-11-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-28 DOI:10.1097/CAD.0000000000001836
Tao Wang, Yi Zhang, Xinhua Yang, Peng Qi
{"title":"Tertiary lymphoid structure transcriptomic signatures show limited and cohort-dependent value for predicting axillary nodal involvement in oestrogen receptor-positive luminal breast cancer.","authors":"Tao Wang, Yi Zhang, Xinhua Yang, Peng Qi","doi":"10.1097/CAD.0000000000001836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) are associated with prognosis in solid tumours. Their value for predicting axillary nodal involvement in oestrogen receptor-positive luminal breast cancer remains uncertain. Three published TLS signatures were scored by single-sample gene set enrichment analysis in oestrogen receptor-positive luminal tumours. The Cancer Genome Atlas Breast Invasive Carcinoma cohort (TCGA-BRCA) included 632 cases, of which 379 met strict consensus. METABRIC included 1086 cases, of which 663 met strict consensus. Logistic models adjusted for age and pathological tumour stage. Strict consensus, majority vote, and continuous scores were compared. Performance assessment included bootstrapped changes in area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve, Brier scores, calibration, and decision-curve analysis. Survival was evaluated in METABRIC and explored in TCGA-BRCA. Strict-consensus TLS status was not associated with nodal positivity in TCGA-BRCA (adjusted odds ratio: 0.95, 95% confidence interval: 0.62-1.45, P = 0.822). METABRIC was similar (odds ratio: 0.76, 95% confidence interval: 0.55-1.06, P = 0.105). Full-cohort METABRIC analyses detected small majority-vote and continuous-score associations, absent in TCGA-BRCA. Across specifications, bootstrapped changes in area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve ranged from 0.0002 to 0.0089, with minimal Brier-score improvement and no stable decision-curve benefit. In METABRIC, the univariable overall survival association attenuated after age adjustment (hazard ratio: 1.33-1.10). TCGA-BRCA survival analyses were nonsignificant. TLS transcriptomic signals showed small, cohort-dependent associations with nodal status but no reproducible or clinically meaningful incremental predictive value. These data do not support replacing sentinel lymph node biopsy with a TLS signature in oestrogen receptor-positive luminal breast cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":7969,"journal":{"name":"Anti-Cancer Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"608-619"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anti-Cancer Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CAD.0000000000001836","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) are associated with prognosis in solid tumours. Their value for predicting axillary nodal involvement in oestrogen receptor-positive luminal breast cancer remains uncertain. Three published TLS signatures were scored by single-sample gene set enrichment analysis in oestrogen receptor-positive luminal tumours. The Cancer Genome Atlas Breast Invasive Carcinoma cohort (TCGA-BRCA) included 632 cases, of which 379 met strict consensus. METABRIC included 1086 cases, of which 663 met strict consensus. Logistic models adjusted for age and pathological tumour stage. Strict consensus, majority vote, and continuous scores were compared. Performance assessment included bootstrapped changes in area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve, Brier scores, calibration, and decision-curve analysis. Survival was evaluated in METABRIC and explored in TCGA-BRCA. Strict-consensus TLS status was not associated with nodal positivity in TCGA-BRCA (adjusted odds ratio: 0.95, 95% confidence interval: 0.62-1.45, P = 0.822). METABRIC was similar (odds ratio: 0.76, 95% confidence interval: 0.55-1.06, P = 0.105). Full-cohort METABRIC analyses detected small majority-vote and continuous-score associations, absent in TCGA-BRCA. Across specifications, bootstrapped changes in area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve ranged from 0.0002 to 0.0089, with minimal Brier-score improvement and no stable decision-curve benefit. In METABRIC, the univariable overall survival association attenuated after age adjustment (hazard ratio: 1.33-1.10). TCGA-BRCA survival analyses were nonsignificant. TLS transcriptomic signals showed small, cohort-dependent associations with nodal status but no reproducible or clinically meaningful incremental predictive value. These data do not support replacing sentinel lymph node biopsy with a TLS signature in oestrogen receptor-positive luminal breast cancer.

在雌激素受体阳性的腔内乳腺癌中,三级淋巴结构转录组特征在预测腋窝淋巴结累及方面显示有限的和依赖队列的价值。
三级淋巴样结构(TLS)与实体肿瘤的预后有关。它们在雌激素受体阳性腔内乳腺癌中预测腋窝淋巴结累及的价值仍不确定。通过对雌激素受体阳性腔内肿瘤的单样本基因集富集分析,对三个已发表的TLS特征进行评分。Cancer Genome Atlas Breast Invasive Carcinoma队列(TCGA-BRCA)纳入632例,其中379例符合严格共识。METABRIC纳入1086例,其中663例符合严格共识。Logistic模型校正了年龄和病理肿瘤分期。比较了严格共识、多数投票和连续得分。绩效评估包括接受者-工作特征曲线下面积的自举变化、Brier评分、校准和决策曲线分析。在METABRIC中评估生存率,在TCGA-BRCA中探讨生存率。TCGA-BRCA患者严格一致TLS状态与淋巴结阳性无相关性(校正优势比:0.95,95%可信区间:0.62-1.45,P = 0.822)。METABRIC相似(优势比:0.76,95%可信区间:0.55-1.06,P = 0.105)。全队列METABRIC分析发现了TCGA-BRCA中不存在的小多数投票和连续评分关联。在不同的规格下,受者工作特征曲线下的自启动面积变化范围为0.0002到0.0089,brier评分的改善很小,没有稳定的决策曲线效益。在METABRIC中,单变量总生存相关性在年龄调整后减弱(风险比:1.33-1.10)。TCGA-BRCA生存分析无统计学意义。TLS转录组信号与淋巴结状态显示出小的、依赖于队列的关联,但没有可重复的或有临床意义的增量预测价值。这些数据不支持在雌激素受体阳性的腔内乳腺癌中用TLS标记代替前哨淋巴结活检。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anti-Cancer Drugs
Anti-Cancer Drugs 医学-药学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
244
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Anti-Cancer Drugs reports both clinical and experimental results related to anti-cancer drugs, and welcomes contributions on anti-cancer drug design, drug delivery, pharmacology, hormonal and biological modalities and chemotherapy evaluation. An internationally refereed journal devoted to the fast publication of innovative investigations on therapeutic agents against cancer, Anti-Cancer Drugs aims to stimulate and report research on both toxic and non-toxic anti-cancer agents. Consequently, the scope on the journal will cover both conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy and hormonal or biological response modalities such as interleukins and immunotherapy. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书