Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature.

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Advances in Orthopedics Pub Date : 2026-07-30 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/aort/4460484
Greta Tanzi Germani, Doriana Di Costa, Antonio Bove, Pierluigi Puca, Franco Scaldaferri, Giulio Maccauro, Raffaele Vitiello
{"title":"Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature.","authors":"Greta Tanzi Germani, Doriana Di Costa, Antonio Bove, Pierluigi Puca, Franco Scaldaferri, Giulio Maccauro, Raffaele Vitiello","doi":"10.1155/aort/4460484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a severe complication after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may plausibly increase this risk because of chronic systemic inflammation, intestinal barrier dysfunction, malnutrition, and exposure to immunosuppressive therapies; however, the available orthopedic literature is sparse and heterogeneous.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was revised in accordance with PRISMA 2020 principles and the PRISMA 2020 for Abstracts recommendations. The primary review question was whether patients with IBD undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are at increased risk of PJI or septic revision. Cohort and case-control studies reporting arthroplasty-related infectious outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, or unspecified IBD were eligible for the primary analysis. To ensure the study is scientifically sound, case reports describing nonprosthetic osteomyelitis were excluded from the primary quantitative analysis and evaluated separately using CARE principles as contextual qualitative evidence. No prospective protocol registration was completed before the original review process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The revised review identified two retrospective cohort studies suitable for the primary analysis and two case reports retained in a separate qualitative appendix. The primary analysis included 22,320 arthroplasty patients with IBD studied against much larger non-IBD comparator cohorts. One THA registry study found a higher risk of septic revision in patients with IBD, whereas one TKA database study found higher postoperative PJI odds in both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Direct quantitative pooling was considered inappropriate because the studies differed in joint type, follow-up duration, and outcome definition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The currently available evidence suggests that IBD may be associated with an increased risk of infection-related failure after arthroplasty, but the certainty of evidence is low to very low because only two retrospective cohort studies directly addressed this question. Future research should use standardized PJI definitions, report disease activity and immunosuppressive treatment in detail, and prospectively evaluate whether the excess risk is related to IBD itself or to modifiable perioperative factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":7358,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Orthopedics","volume":"2026 ","pages":"4460484"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13424604/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/aort/4460484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a severe complication after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may plausibly increase this risk because of chronic systemic inflammation, intestinal barrier dysfunction, malnutrition, and exposure to immunosuppressive therapies; however, the available orthopedic literature is sparse and heterogeneous.

Methods: This systematic review was revised in accordance with PRISMA 2020 principles and the PRISMA 2020 for Abstracts recommendations. The primary review question was whether patients with IBD undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are at increased risk of PJI or septic revision. Cohort and case-control studies reporting arthroplasty-related infectious outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, or unspecified IBD were eligible for the primary analysis. To ensure the study is scientifically sound, case reports describing nonprosthetic osteomyelitis were excluded from the primary quantitative analysis and evaluated separately using CARE principles as contextual qualitative evidence. No prospective protocol registration was completed before the original review process.

Results: The revised review identified two retrospective cohort studies suitable for the primary analysis and two case reports retained in a separate qualitative appendix. The primary analysis included 22,320 arthroplasty patients with IBD studied against much larger non-IBD comparator cohorts. One THA registry study found a higher risk of septic revision in patients with IBD, whereas one TKA database study found higher postoperative PJI odds in both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Direct quantitative pooling was considered inappropriate because the studies differed in joint type, follow-up duration, and outcome definition.

Conclusions: The currently available evidence suggests that IBD may be associated with an increased risk of infection-related failure after arthroplasty, but the certainty of evidence is low to very low because only two retrospective cohort studies directly addressed this question. Future research should use standardized PJI definitions, report disease activity and immunosuppressive treatment in detail, and prospectively evaluate whether the excess risk is related to IBD itself or to modifiable perioperative factors.

炎症性肠病和全关节置换术后假体周围关节感染的风险:对当前文献的系统回顾。
背景:假体周围关节感染(PJI)是全关节置换术(TJA)后的严重并发症。炎症性肠病(IBD)可能会增加这种风险,因为慢性全身性炎症、肠屏障功能障碍、营养不良和暴露于免疫抑制疗法;然而,现有的骨科文献是稀疏和异构的。方法:本系统综述按照PRISMA 2020原则和PRISMA 2020摘要建议进行修订。主要的回顾问题是IBD患者接受全髋关节置换术(THA)或全膝关节置换术(TKA)是否会增加PJI或脓毒性翻修的风险。报告克罗恩病、溃疡性结肠炎或未指明的IBD患者关节置换术相关感染结局的队列研究和病例对照研究符合初步分析的条件。为了确保研究的科学合理性,描述非假体骨髓炎的病例报告被排除在主要的定量分析之外,并使用CARE原则作为背景定性证据进行单独评估。在最初的审查过程之前,没有完成前瞻性方案注册。结果:修订后的综述确定了两项适合进行主要分析的回顾性队列研究,两份病例报告保留在单独的定性附录中。主要分析包括22320例IBD关节置换术患者,与更大的非IBD比较组进行研究。一项THA登记研究发现,IBD患者脓毒性改良的风险更高,而一项TKA数据库研究发现克罗恩病和溃疡性结肠炎患者术后PJI发生率更高。直接定量合并被认为是不合适的,因为研究在关节类型、随访时间和结果定义上存在差异。结论:目前可获得的证据表明,IBD可能与关节置换术后感染相关衰竭的风险增加有关,但证据的确定性很低到非常低,因为只有两项回顾性队列研究直接解决了这个问题。未来的研究应使用标准化的PJI定义,详细报告疾病活动性和免疫抑制治疗,并前瞻性评估过度风险是否与IBD本身或可改变的围手术期因素有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Orthopedics is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for orthopaedics working on improving the quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to arthroplasty, hand surgery, limb reconstruction, pediatric orthopaedics, sports medicine, trauma, spinal deformities, and orthopaedic oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书