Mohamed A Yakoub, Purvil Sukhadia, Carla Saoud, Meera Hameed, Cristina R Antonescu
{"title":"Not all NTRK fusions in mesenchymal neoplasia are driver events: implications on classification and targeted therapy","authors":"Mohamed A Yakoub, Purvil Sukhadia, Carla Saoud, Meera Hameed, Cristina R Antonescu","doi":"10.1002/2056-4538.70111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>NTRK</i> fusions drive the pathogenesis of a distinctive group of mesenchymal neoplasms with significant impact on classification and targeted therapy. However, unexpected <i>NTRK</i> fusions have been reported in other sarcoma entities, raising uncertainty over their specificity and clinical management. Herein, we investigate the incidence and structural variants of <i>NTRK</i> fusions among a large clinicopathologic and molecular sarcoma cohort. The goal was to distinguish primary driver <i>NTRK</i> fusions from potential passenger events and correlate with sarcoma histotypes. <i>NTRK1-3</i> fusions were queried across a large spectrum of sarcomas, profiled by targeted DNA and/or RNAseq. Fusions were classified as oncogenic when <i>NTRK</i> was the 3′ partner, in-frame, retained kinase domain (KD), and/or RNAseq confirmation; fusions of uncertain significance (FUS) when out-of-frame, lacking full KD, and/or RNAseq negative. We identified 48 cases with <i>NTRK</i> fusions, detected either by pathologist-initiated RNAseq for diagnosis (<i>n</i> = 27) or by clinician-initiated DNAseq for therapeutic target discovery (<i>n</i> = 21). For the latter subset, reflex RNAseq was activated for confirmation. Integrated review confirmed 33 (69%) oncogenic fusions. Remaining were FUS, apart from one indeterminate. In all except three cases, oncogenic fusions occurred in canonical <i>NTRK</i>-driven histotypes. In contrast, <i>NTRK</i> FUS were detected in various pathologic entities, including well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma (<i>n</i> = 9, 60%), two osteosarcoma, and single cases of other subtypes. <i>NTRK1</i> fusions were the most common in both oncogenic and FUS groups (61%, 67%). <i>CDKN2A/B</i> deletions were observed mostly in oncogenic <i>NTRK1</i> fusions (71%), while <i>MDM2/CDK4</i> amplifications in the <i>NTRK1</i> FUS. The FUS group demonstrated lower <i>NTRK</i> mRNA expression, with a mean of −4.60, <i>p</i> < 0.001. Pan-TRK immunohistochemistry was positive in cases with oncogenic <i>NTRK</i> fusions, and negative in FUS cases. Only two-thirds of <i>NTRK</i> fusions detected were functional drivers, mostly from pathologist-driven testing of suggestive histotypes. In contrast, genomic profiling in complex sarcomas often yields passenger FUS, lacking functional impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":48612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research","volume":"12 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/2056-4538.70111","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2056-4538.70111","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
NTRK fusions drive the pathogenesis of a distinctive group of mesenchymal neoplasms with significant impact on classification and targeted therapy. However, unexpected NTRK fusions have been reported in other sarcoma entities, raising uncertainty over their specificity and clinical management. Herein, we investigate the incidence and structural variants of NTRK fusions among a large clinicopathologic and molecular sarcoma cohort. The goal was to distinguish primary driver NTRK fusions from potential passenger events and correlate with sarcoma histotypes. NTRK1-3 fusions were queried across a large spectrum of sarcomas, profiled by targeted DNA and/or RNAseq. Fusions were classified as oncogenic when NTRK was the 3′ partner, in-frame, retained kinase domain (KD), and/or RNAseq confirmation; fusions of uncertain significance (FUS) when out-of-frame, lacking full KD, and/or RNAseq negative. We identified 48 cases with NTRK fusions, detected either by pathologist-initiated RNAseq for diagnosis (n = 27) or by clinician-initiated DNAseq for therapeutic target discovery (n = 21). For the latter subset, reflex RNAseq was activated for confirmation. Integrated review confirmed 33 (69%) oncogenic fusions. Remaining were FUS, apart from one indeterminate. In all except three cases, oncogenic fusions occurred in canonical NTRK-driven histotypes. In contrast, NTRK FUS were detected in various pathologic entities, including well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma (n = 9, 60%), two osteosarcoma, and single cases of other subtypes. NTRK1 fusions were the most common in both oncogenic and FUS groups (61%, 67%). CDKN2A/B deletions were observed mostly in oncogenic NTRK1 fusions (71%), while MDM2/CDK4 amplifications in the NTRK1 FUS. The FUS group demonstrated lower NTRK mRNA expression, with a mean of −4.60, p < 0.001. Pan-TRK immunohistochemistry was positive in cases with oncogenic NTRK fusions, and negative in FUS cases. Only two-thirds of NTRK fusions detected were functional drivers, mostly from pathologist-driven testing of suggestive histotypes. In contrast, genomic profiling in complex sarcomas often yields passenger FUS, lacking functional impact.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research and The Journal of Pathology serve as translational bridges between basic biomedical science and clinical medicine with particular emphasis on, but not restricted to, tissue based studies.
The focus of The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research is the publication of studies that illuminate the clinical relevance of research in the broad area of the study of disease. Appropriately powered and validated studies with novel diagnostic, prognostic and predictive significance, and biomarker discover and validation, will be welcomed. Studies with a predominantly mechanistic basis will be more appropriate for the companion Journal of Pathology.