Not all NTRK fusions in mesenchymal neoplasia are driver events: implications on classification and targeted therapy

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Mohamed A Yakoub, Purvil Sukhadia, Carla Saoud, Meera Hameed, Cristina R Antonescu
{"title":"Not all NTRK fusions in mesenchymal neoplasia are driver events: implications on classification and targeted therapy","authors":"Mohamed A Yakoub,&nbsp;Purvil Sukhadia,&nbsp;Carla Saoud,&nbsp;Meera Hameed,&nbsp;Cristina R Antonescu","doi":"10.1002/2056-4538.70111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>NTRK</i> fusions drive the pathogenesis of a distinctive group of mesenchymal neoplasms with significant impact on classification and targeted therapy. However, unexpected <i>NTRK</i> fusions have been reported in other sarcoma entities, raising uncertainty over their specificity and clinical management. Herein, we investigate the incidence and structural variants of <i>NTRK</i> fusions among a large clinicopathologic and molecular sarcoma cohort. The goal was to distinguish primary driver <i>NTRK</i> fusions from potential passenger events and correlate with sarcoma histotypes. <i>NTRK1-3</i> fusions were queried across a large spectrum of sarcomas, profiled by targeted DNA and/or RNAseq. Fusions were classified as oncogenic when <i>NTRK</i> was the 3′ partner, in-frame, retained kinase domain (KD), and/or RNAseq confirmation; fusions of uncertain significance (FUS) when out-of-frame, lacking full KD, and/or RNAseq negative. We identified 48 cases with <i>NTRK</i> fusions, detected either by pathologist-initiated RNAseq for diagnosis (<i>n</i> = 27) or by clinician-initiated DNAseq for therapeutic target discovery (<i>n</i> = 21). For the latter subset, reflex RNAseq was activated for confirmation. Integrated review confirmed 33 (69%) oncogenic fusions. Remaining were FUS, apart from one indeterminate. In all except three cases, oncogenic fusions occurred in canonical <i>NTRK</i>-driven histotypes. In contrast, <i>NTRK</i> FUS were detected in various pathologic entities, including well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma (<i>n</i> = 9, 60%), two osteosarcoma, and single cases of other subtypes. <i>NTRK1</i> fusions were the most common in both oncogenic and FUS groups (61%, 67%). <i>CDKN2A/B</i> deletions were observed mostly in oncogenic <i>NTRK1</i> fusions (71%), while <i>MDM2/CDK4</i> amplifications in the <i>NTRK1</i> FUS. The FUS group demonstrated lower <i>NTRK</i> mRNA expression, with a mean of −4.60, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001. Pan-TRK immunohistochemistry was positive in cases with oncogenic <i>NTRK</i> fusions, and negative in FUS cases. Only two-thirds of <i>NTRK</i> fusions detected were functional drivers, mostly from pathologist-driven testing of suggestive histotypes. In contrast, genomic profiling in complex sarcomas often yields passenger FUS, lacking functional impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":48612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research","volume":"12 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/2056-4538.70111","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2056-4538.70111","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

NTRK fusions drive the pathogenesis of a distinctive group of mesenchymal neoplasms with significant impact on classification and targeted therapy. However, unexpected NTRK fusions have been reported in other sarcoma entities, raising uncertainty over their specificity and clinical management. Herein, we investigate the incidence and structural variants of NTRK fusions among a large clinicopathologic and molecular sarcoma cohort. The goal was to distinguish primary driver NTRK fusions from potential passenger events and correlate with sarcoma histotypes. NTRK1-3 fusions were queried across a large spectrum of sarcomas, profiled by targeted DNA and/or RNAseq. Fusions were classified as oncogenic when NTRK was the 3′ partner, in-frame, retained kinase domain (KD), and/or RNAseq confirmation; fusions of uncertain significance (FUS) when out-of-frame, lacking full KD, and/or RNAseq negative. We identified 48 cases with NTRK fusions, detected either by pathologist-initiated RNAseq for diagnosis (n = 27) or by clinician-initiated DNAseq for therapeutic target discovery (n = 21). For the latter subset, reflex RNAseq was activated for confirmation. Integrated review confirmed 33 (69%) oncogenic fusions. Remaining were FUS, apart from one indeterminate. In all except three cases, oncogenic fusions occurred in canonical NTRK-driven histotypes. In contrast, NTRK FUS were detected in various pathologic entities, including well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma (n = 9, 60%), two osteosarcoma, and single cases of other subtypes. NTRK1 fusions were the most common in both oncogenic and FUS groups (61%, 67%). CDKN2A/B deletions were observed mostly in oncogenic NTRK1 fusions (71%), while MDM2/CDK4 amplifications in the NTRK1 FUS. The FUS group demonstrated lower NTRK mRNA expression, with a mean of −4.60, p < 0.001. Pan-TRK immunohistochemistry was positive in cases with oncogenic NTRK fusions, and negative in FUS cases. Only two-thirds of NTRK fusions detected were functional drivers, mostly from pathologist-driven testing of suggestive histotypes. In contrast, genomic profiling in complex sarcomas often yields passenger FUS, lacking functional impact.

Abstract Image

并非所有间充质瘤的NTRK融合都是驱动事件:对分类和靶向治疗的影响
NTRK融合驱动一组独特的间充质肿瘤的发病机制,对分类和靶向治疗有重要影响。然而,在其他肉瘤实体中也报道了意想不到的NTRK融合,这增加了其特异性和临床管理的不确定性。在此,我们研究了大量临床病理和分子肉瘤队列中NTRK融合的发生率和结构变异。目的是区分主要驱动NTRK融合与潜在乘客事件,并与肉瘤组织型相关。通过靶向DNA和/或RNAseq对大量肉瘤的NTRK1-3融合进行了查询。当NTRK是3 '伴侣、框架内、保留激酶结构域(KD)和/或RNAseq确认时,融合被归类为致癌;当帧外、缺乏完整KD和/或RNAseq阴性时,不确定意义融合(FUS)。我们确定了48例NTRK融合病例,通过病理学家发起的RNAseq进行诊断(n = 27)或通过临床发起的dna naseq进行治疗靶点发现(n = 21)。对于后者,反射性RNAseq被激活以进行确认。综合评价证实33例(69%)癌性融合。除1例不确定外,其余为FUS。除3例外,在所有病例中,致癌融合发生在典型的ntrk驱动组织型中。相比之下,NTRK FUS在各种病理实体中都被检测到,包括高分化/去分化脂肪肉瘤(n = 9,60 %),两种骨肉瘤和其他亚型的单个病例。NTRK1融合在致癌组和FUS组中最常见(61%,67%)。CDKN2A/B缺失主要出现在致癌的NTRK1融合体中(71%),而MDM2/CDK4扩增出现在NTRK1 FUS中。FUS组表现出较低的NTRK mRNA表达,平均为- 4.60,p < 0.001。泛trk免疫组化在致癌性NTRK融合的病例中呈阳性,在FUS病例中呈阴性。检测到的NTRK融合中只有三分之二是功能性驱动因子,主要来自病理驱动的暗示性组织型检测。相比之下,复杂肉瘤的基因组分析通常产生乘客FUS,缺乏功能影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pathology Clinical Research
Journal of Pathology Clinical Research Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
47
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research and The Journal of Pathology serve as translational bridges between basic biomedical science and clinical medicine with particular emphasis on, but not restricted to, tissue based studies. The focus of The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research is the publication of studies that illuminate the clinical relevance of research in the broad area of the study of disease. Appropriately powered and validated studies with novel diagnostic, prognostic and predictive significance, and biomarker discover and validation, will be welcomed. Studies with a predominantly mechanistic basis will be more appropriate for the companion Journal of Pathology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书