Efecto protector de la vacunación antineumocócica en la evolución de la neumonía neumocócica: análisis ajustado por gravedad y comorbilidad

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Revista clinica espanola Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-04 DOI:10.1016/j.rce.2026.502575
J.M. Moreno Salcedo, P. Malo Rico, G. Alcalá Rivera, M.F. Rueda Narváez
{"title":"Efecto protector de la vacunación antineumocócica en la evolución de la neumonía neumocócica: análisis ajustado por gravedad y comorbilidad","authors":"J.M. Moreno Salcedo,&nbsp;P. Malo Rico,&nbsp;G. Alcalá Rivera,&nbsp;M.F. Rueda Narváez","doi":"10.1016/j.rce.2026.502575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Pneumococcal vaccination may attenuate the severity of pneumococcal pneumonia even in breakthrough infections. However, evidence on this effect stratified by clinical severity is scarce. The objective was to evaluate whether vaccination reduces poor outcomes in patients hospitalized for pneumococcal pneumonia, specifically according to CURB-65 severity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective observational study of 90 adults with microbiologically confirmed pneumococcal pneumonia (January 2020–December 2024). Poor outcome was defined as death or ICU admission. Propensity score matching (PSM) 1:1 was performed to control for indication bias, adjusting for age, sex, comorbidity, CURB-65, and dependency. In the matched sample (43 pairs), the effect of vaccination on poor outcome was analysed with logistic regression further adjusted for comorbidity and CURB-65. Sensitivity analysis was conducted with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Vaccinated patients had higher age, comorbidity, and CURB-65 at admission. PSM achieved adequate balance between groups. In the matched sample, poor outcome occurred in 34.9% of vaccinated and 51.2% of unvaccinated (absolute reduction 16.3%). Adjusted OR for vaccination was 0.42 (95% CI: 0.16-1.07; <em>P</em>=.070), suggesting a possible protective effect, although statistical significance was not reached. CURB-65 was an independent predictor of poor outcome (OR per point: 1.93; <em>P</em>=.006). IPTW yielded an OR of 1.28 (95% CI: 0.67-2.47; <em>P</em>=.46).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Pneumococcal vaccination shows a possible protective effect, with a trend toward clinically relevant benefit, especially in patients with more severe disease (CURB-65 ≥3), reducing poor outcomes by 16.3%. This finding supports vaccination in adults with risk factors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21223,"journal":{"name":"Revista clinica espanola","volume":"226 7","pages":"Article 502575"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista clinica espanola","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014256526011847","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective

Pneumococcal vaccination may attenuate the severity of pneumococcal pneumonia even in breakthrough infections. However, evidence on this effect stratified by clinical severity is scarce. The objective was to evaluate whether vaccination reduces poor outcomes in patients hospitalized for pneumococcal pneumonia, specifically according to CURB-65 severity.

Methods

Retrospective observational study of 90 adults with microbiologically confirmed pneumococcal pneumonia (January 2020–December 2024). Poor outcome was defined as death or ICU admission. Propensity score matching (PSM) 1:1 was performed to control for indication bias, adjusting for age, sex, comorbidity, CURB-65, and dependency. In the matched sample (43 pairs), the effect of vaccination on poor outcome was analysed with logistic regression further adjusted for comorbidity and CURB-65. Sensitivity analysis was conducted with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).

Results

Vaccinated patients had higher age, comorbidity, and CURB-65 at admission. PSM achieved adequate balance between groups. In the matched sample, poor outcome occurred in 34.9% of vaccinated and 51.2% of unvaccinated (absolute reduction 16.3%). Adjusted OR for vaccination was 0.42 (95% CI: 0.16-1.07; P=.070), suggesting a possible protective effect, although statistical significance was not reached. CURB-65 was an independent predictor of poor outcome (OR per point: 1.93; P=.006). IPTW yielded an OR of 1.28 (95% CI: 0.67-2.47; P=.46).

Conclusions

Pneumococcal vaccination shows a possible protective effect, with a trend toward clinically relevant benefit, especially in patients with more severe disease (CURB-65 ≥3), reducing poor outcomes by 16.3%. This finding supports vaccination in adults with risk factors.

Abstract Image

肺炎球菌疫苗在肺炎球菌肺炎发展中的保护作用:按严重程度和共发病情况进行调整分析
背景与目的肺炎球菌疫苗接种可以减轻肺炎球菌肺炎的严重程度,即使是突破性感染。然而,根据临床严重程度对这种影响进行分层的证据很少。目的是评估疫苗接种是否减少肺炎球菌肺炎住院患者的不良预后,特别是根据CURB-65严重程度。方法对90例微生物学确诊的成人肺炎球菌肺炎(2020年1月- 2024年12月)进行回顾性观察研究。不良预后定义为死亡或入住ICU。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM) 1:1来控制指征偏倚,调整年龄、性别、合并症、CURB-65和依赖性。在匹配样本(43对)中,通过进一步调整合并症和CURB-65的逻辑回归分析疫苗接种对不良结局的影响。采用处理加权逆概率(IPTW)进行敏感性分析。结果接种疫苗的患者入院时年龄、合并症和CURB-65较高。PSM在群体之间取得了足够的平衡。在匹配的样本中,34.9%的接种者和51.2%的未接种者发生不良结果(绝对减少16.3%)。疫苗接种的校正OR为0.42 (95% CI: 0.16-1.07; P= 0.070),提示可能具有保护作用,但未达到统计学显著性。CURB-65是不良预后的独立预测因子(每分OR: 1.93; P= 0.006)。IPTW的OR为1.28 (95% CI: 0.67-2.47; P= 0.46)。结论肺炎球菌疫苗接种可能具有保护作用,具有临床相关获益的趋势,特别是在病情较严重(CURB-65≥3)的患者中,可将不良结局减少16.3%。这一发现支持有危险因素的成年人接种疫苗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista clinica espanola
Revista clinica espanola 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
73
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: Revista Clínica Española published its first issue in 1940 and is the body of expression of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI). The journal fully endorses the goals of updating knowledge and facilitating the acquisition of key developments in internal medicine applied to clinical practice. Revista Clínica Española is subject to a thorough double blind review of the received articles written in Spanish or English. Nine issues are published each year, including mostly originals, reviews and consensus documents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书