Evidence-based counseling on bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for individuals using therapeutic testosterone: a narrative review

IF 2.8
F&S reviews Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-04 DOI:10.1016/j.xfnr.2026.100111
Emily Viera B.A., David Boedeker D.O., Kiley Hunkler M.D., Micah Hill M.D.
{"title":"Evidence-based counseling on bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for individuals using therapeutic testosterone: a narrative review","authors":"Emily Viera B.A.,&nbsp;David Boedeker D.O.,&nbsp;Kiley Hunkler M.D.,&nbsp;Micah Hill M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.xfnr.2026.100111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Our objective was to synthesize existing evidence on the risks, benefits, and long-term considerations of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) in individuals using therapeutic testosterone. A structured review identified studies on fertility, cardiovascular and bone health, surgical risks, hormone therapy considerations, and malignancy risk. Studies of adults undergoing BSO who used therapeutic testosterone were included. Nonhuman, pediatric/adolescent, and non-English articles were excluded. Of the 368 articles screened, 88 full texts were reviewed, and 51 met the inclusion criteria. Fertility preservation was the most frequently discussed topic. Oocyte cryopreservation is feasible, including with continued testosterone use, although long-term outcomes remain limited to case-based evidence. Available data suggest a low risk of ovarian malignancy, with no clear evidence that testosterone therapy increases cancer risk. Cardiovascular findings were mixed; some studies reported no significant changes, whereas others noted altered lipid profiles. Although testosterone generally maintains bone mass, several studies observed cortical bone loss after BSO, indicating that testosterone may not fully compensate for estrogen deficiency. Surgical complication rates were comparable with those of other populations, although data on reoperation rates were limited. The bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy counseling should be individualized and guided by current evidence, which supports continuation of testosterone therapy and suggests a low malignancy risk with ovarian retention. Clinicians should address existing uncertainties as part of shared decision-making. Further high-quality, longitudinal research is needed to guide clinical recommendations and optimize care for individuals using therapeutic testosterone who are considering BSO.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73011,"journal":{"name":"F&S reviews","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 100111"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F&S reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666571926000125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our objective was to synthesize existing evidence on the risks, benefits, and long-term considerations of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) in individuals using therapeutic testosterone. A structured review identified studies on fertility, cardiovascular and bone health, surgical risks, hormone therapy considerations, and malignancy risk. Studies of adults undergoing BSO who used therapeutic testosterone were included. Nonhuman, pediatric/adolescent, and non-English articles were excluded. Of the 368 articles screened, 88 full texts were reviewed, and 51 met the inclusion criteria. Fertility preservation was the most frequently discussed topic. Oocyte cryopreservation is feasible, including with continued testosterone use, although long-term outcomes remain limited to case-based evidence. Available data suggest a low risk of ovarian malignancy, with no clear evidence that testosterone therapy increases cancer risk. Cardiovascular findings were mixed; some studies reported no significant changes, whereas others noted altered lipid profiles. Although testosterone generally maintains bone mass, several studies observed cortical bone loss after BSO, indicating that testosterone may not fully compensate for estrogen deficiency. Surgical complication rates were comparable with those of other populations, although data on reoperation rates were limited. The bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy counseling should be individualized and guided by current evidence, which supports continuation of testosterone therapy and suggests a low malignancy risk with ovarian retention. Clinicians should address existing uncertainties as part of shared decision-making. Further high-quality, longitudinal research is needed to guide clinical recommendations and optimize care for individuals using therapeutic testosterone who are considering BSO.
基于证据的咨询双侧输卵管卵巢切除术的个人使用治疗性睾酮:叙述性回顾
我们的目的是综合现有的证据,对使用治疗性睾酮的个体进行双侧输卵管-卵巢切除术(BSO)的风险、益处和长期考虑。一项结构化的综述确定了有关生育、心血管和骨骼健康、手术风险、激素治疗考虑和恶性肿瘤风险的研究。研究对象包括接受BSO治疗并使用治疗性睾酮的成人。非人类、儿童/青少年和非英语文章被排除在外。在筛选的368篇文章中,88篇全文被审查,51篇符合纳入标准。保留生育能力是最常讨论的话题。卵母细胞冷冻保存是可行的,包括继续使用睾酮,尽管长期结果仍然限于基于病例的证据。现有数据表明卵巢恶性肿瘤的风险较低,没有明确的证据表明睾酮治疗会增加癌症风险。心血管方面的发现有好有坏;一些研究报告没有明显的变化,而另一些则注意到脂质谱的改变。尽管睾酮通常能维持骨量,但一些研究观察到BSO后皮质骨丢失,表明睾酮可能不能完全补偿雌激素缺乏。手术并发症发生率与其他人群相当,尽管再手术率的数据有限。双侧输卵管-卵巢切除术咨询应个体化,并以目前的证据为指导,这些证据支持继续睾酮治疗,并表明卵巢保留的恶性肿瘤风险低。临床医生应解决现有的不确定性,作为共同决策的一部分。需要进一步的高质量的纵向研究来指导临床建议,并优化正在考虑BSO的使用治疗性睾酮的个体的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
F&S reviews
F&S reviews Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Urology
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
61 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书