Practice patterns of strong opioid recommendations by palliative care consultation services in German hospitals (online survey).

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Evelyn Mueller, Susanne Gahr, Annette Schnell, Christoph Aulmann, Carmen Roch
{"title":"Practice patterns of strong opioid recommendations by palliative care consultation services in German hospitals (online survey).","authors":"Evelyn Mueller, Susanne Gahr, Annette Schnell, Christoph Aulmann, Carmen Roch","doi":"10.1186/s12904-026-02266-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Strong opioids are central to effective symptom control in palliative care. In cases of complex symptom burden, primary care teams frequently rely on palliative care consultation services (PCCSs) for expert guidance. This survey explored the recommendations issued by hospital-based PCCS teams regarding the use of strong opioids in patients with advanced disease (e.g. clinical indications, opioid agent).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A closed online survey was conducted via the SoSci Survey platform. All PCCS teams registered with the German Association for Palliative Medicine were invited to participate in November 2024, with a reminder sent three weeks later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-nine PCCS teams participated (21 university hospitals, 18 general hospitals). All respondents agreed on the indication for strong opioids in cancer-related pain and dyspnea. Differences emerged regarding the use of opioids in patients with non-malignant conditions: although most PCCS considered opioids appropriate for dyspnea associated with pulmonary (n = 37) or cardiac disease (n = 33), non-cancer pain was less consistently endorsed (n = 20). Hydromorphone and morphine were the most commonly used opioids (> 30 services reporting frequent use), whereas the use of fentanyl, oxycodone, and buprenorphine varied widely across services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is consensus regarding the use of opioids in patients with cancer-related pain and dyspnea. The differing approaches to their use for symptoms caused by non-malignant conditions suggest varying clinical interpretations and underscore the need for further research and clearer guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":48945,"journal":{"name":"BMC Palliative Care","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13428421/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-026-02266-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Strong opioids are central to effective symptom control in palliative care. In cases of complex symptom burden, primary care teams frequently rely on palliative care consultation services (PCCSs) for expert guidance. This survey explored the recommendations issued by hospital-based PCCS teams regarding the use of strong opioids in patients with advanced disease (e.g. clinical indications, opioid agent).

Methods: A closed online survey was conducted via the SoSci Survey platform. All PCCS teams registered with the German Association for Palliative Medicine were invited to participate in November 2024, with a reminder sent three weeks later.

Results: Thirty-nine PCCS teams participated (21 university hospitals, 18 general hospitals). All respondents agreed on the indication for strong opioids in cancer-related pain and dyspnea. Differences emerged regarding the use of opioids in patients with non-malignant conditions: although most PCCS considered opioids appropriate for dyspnea associated with pulmonary (n = 37) or cardiac disease (n = 33), non-cancer pain was less consistently endorsed (n = 20). Hydromorphone and morphine were the most commonly used opioids (> 30 services reporting frequent use), whereas the use of fentanyl, oxycodone, and buprenorphine varied widely across services.

Conclusions: There is consensus regarding the use of opioids in patients with cancer-related pain and dyspnea. The differing approaches to their use for symptoms caused by non-malignant conditions suggest varying clinical interpretations and underscore the need for further research and clearer guidelines.

德国医院姑息治疗咨询服务对强阿片类药物建议的实践模式(在线调查)。
背景:强阿片类药物是在姑息治疗中有效控制症状的核心。在复杂症状负担的情况下,初级保健团队经常依赖姑息治疗咨询服务(PCCSs)的专家指导。本调查探讨了以医院为基础的PCCS小组就晚期疾病患者使用强阿片类药物(例如临床指征、阿片类药物)提出的建议。方法:通过SoSci调查平台进行封闭式在线调查。所有在德国姑息医学协会注册的PCCS团队都被邀请参加2024年11月的活动,并在三周后发出提醒。结果:共有39个PCCS小组参与其中(21个大学医院,18个综合医院)。所有受访者都同意强阿片类药物在癌症相关疼痛和呼吸困难中的适应症。在非恶性疾病患者中使用阿片类药物方面出现了差异:尽管大多数PCCS认为阿片类药物适用于与肺部(n = 37)或心脏病(n = 33)相关的呼吸困难,但非癌症疼痛的一致性较少(n = 20)。氢吗啡酮和吗啡是最常用的阿片类药物(bbb30服务机构报告频繁使用),而芬太尼、羟考酮和丁丙诺啡的使用在各服务机构之间差异很大。结论:关于阿片类药物在癌症相关疼痛和呼吸困难患者中的应用已达成共识。将其用于非恶性疾病引起的症状的不同方法提出了不同的临床解释,并强调需要进一步研究和更明确的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Palliative Care
BMC Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
201
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Palliative Care is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the clinical, scientific, ethical and policy issues, local and international, regarding all aspects of hospice and palliative care for the dying and for those with profound suffering related to chronic illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书