Preoperative predictors of patient-reported outcomes after joint-preserving forefoot surgery for rheumatoid arthritis : a case series.

IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Yuki Etani, Takaaki Noguchi, Makoto Hirao, Gensuke Okamura, Atsushi Sugimoto, Seiji Okada, Ken Nakata, Kosuke Ebina
{"title":"Preoperative predictors of patient-reported outcomes after joint-preserving forefoot surgery for rheumatoid arthritis : a case series.","authors":"Yuki Etani, Takaaki Noguchi, Makoto Hirao, Gensuke Okamura, Atsushi Sugimoto, Seiji Okada, Ken Nakata, Kosuke Ebina","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.108B8.BJJ-2025-1801.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Forefoot deformities are common in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and often impair quality of life. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including the Self-Administered Foot Evaluation Questionnaire (SAFE-Q), are increasingly used to assess surgical outcomes; however, the preoperative conditions needed to achieve favourable postoperative PROMs remain unclear. This study aimed to identify factors associated with postoperative SAFE-Q scores (mean score across five sub-scales, maximum 100) and determined preoperative cutoff values predictive of achieving predefined postoperative SAFE-Q thresholds (≥ 70 or ≥ 90).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicentre, retrospective case series, 101 feet in 80 patients (including 21 bilateral cases) with RA who underwent forefoot surgery between July 2015 and July 2023 were analyzed (mean age at surgery 65.8 years (SD 10.7); 79 female patients). Inclusion criteria were symptomatic forefoot deformities with available SAFE-Q data pre-surgery and at ≥ one year post-surgery. Procedures included modified scarf osteotomy and offset shortening osteotomies for the metatarsals. SAFE-Q scores, Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot scores, radiological parameters, and disease activity were evaluated pre- and postoperatively. Multiple regression identified preoperative factors associated with postoperative SAFE-Q scores, and significant variables were further assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses to determine preoperative cutoff values for postoperative SAFE-Q thresholds (≥ 70 and ≥ 90).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperatively, the median SAFE-Q score was 84.8 (IQR 73.0 to 92.3), a significant improvement over the preoperative median score of 48.9 (IQR 34.9 to 67.5; p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that older age and lower preoperative SAFE-Q scores were associated with lower postoperative SAFE-Q scores (β -0.286 (95% CI -0.486 to -0.086) and 0.505 (95% CI 0.319 to 0.691), respectively). ROC analysis identified cutoffs of 54.0 for preoperative SAFE-Q (area under the curve (AUC) 0.644) and 70 years for age (AUC 0.722) when predicting a postoperative score ≥ 90.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher preoperative SAFE-Q scores and younger age at surgery were linked to improved postoperative outcomes. Although their predictive accuracy is limited, these thresholds may help estimate postoperative function and support preoperative counselling and shared decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"108-B 8","pages":"1012-1020"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.108B8.BJJ-2025-1801.R1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Forefoot deformities are common in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and often impair quality of life. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including the Self-Administered Foot Evaluation Questionnaire (SAFE-Q), are increasingly used to assess surgical outcomes; however, the preoperative conditions needed to achieve favourable postoperative PROMs remain unclear. This study aimed to identify factors associated with postoperative SAFE-Q scores (mean score across five sub-scales, maximum 100) and determined preoperative cutoff values predictive of achieving predefined postoperative SAFE-Q thresholds (≥ 70 or ≥ 90).

Methods: In this multicentre, retrospective case series, 101 feet in 80 patients (including 21 bilateral cases) with RA who underwent forefoot surgery between July 2015 and July 2023 were analyzed (mean age at surgery 65.8 years (SD 10.7); 79 female patients). Inclusion criteria were symptomatic forefoot deformities with available SAFE-Q data pre-surgery and at ≥ one year post-surgery. Procedures included modified scarf osteotomy and offset shortening osteotomies for the metatarsals. SAFE-Q scores, Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot scores, radiological parameters, and disease activity were evaluated pre- and postoperatively. Multiple regression identified preoperative factors associated with postoperative SAFE-Q scores, and significant variables were further assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses to determine preoperative cutoff values for postoperative SAFE-Q thresholds (≥ 70 and ≥ 90).

Results: Postoperatively, the median SAFE-Q score was 84.8 (IQR 73.0 to 92.3), a significant improvement over the preoperative median score of 48.9 (IQR 34.9 to 67.5; p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that older age and lower preoperative SAFE-Q scores were associated with lower postoperative SAFE-Q scores (β -0.286 (95% CI -0.486 to -0.086) and 0.505 (95% CI 0.319 to 0.691), respectively). ROC analysis identified cutoffs of 54.0 for preoperative SAFE-Q (area under the curve (AUC) 0.644) and 70 years for age (AUC 0.722) when predicting a postoperative score ≥ 90.

Conclusion: Higher preoperative SAFE-Q scores and younger age at surgery were linked to improved postoperative outcomes. Although their predictive accuracy is limited, these thresholds may help estimate postoperative function and support preoperative counselling and shared decision-making.

类风湿关节炎保关节前足手术患者报告预后的术前预测因素:一个病例系列。
目的:前足畸形在类风湿关节炎(RA)患者中很常见,并且经常影响生活质量。患者报告的结果测量(PROMs),包括自我管理足部评估问卷(SAFE-Q),越来越多地用于评估手术结果;然而,实现良好的术后PROMs所需的术前条件仍不清楚。本研究旨在确定与术后SAFE-Q评分相关的因素(五个子量表的平均分,最大100分),并确定预测达到预定义的术后SAFE-Q阈值(≥70或≥90)的术前截止值。方法:在这个多中心回顾性病例系列中,分析了2015年7月至2023年7月期间接受前足手术的80例RA患者(包括21例双侧病例)的101足(手术时平均年龄65.8岁(SD 10.7);女性79例)。纳入标准为术前和术后1年以上有安全系数q数据的症状性前足畸形。手术包括改良围骨截骨术和跖骨偏移截骨术。术前和术后评估SAFE-Q评分、日本足部外科学会评分、放射学参数和疾病活动性。多元回归确定与术后SAFE-Q评分相关的术前因素,并使用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析进一步评估重要变量,以确定术后SAFE-Q阈值的术前临界值(≥70和≥90)。结果:术后中位SAFE-Q评分为84.8 (IQR为73.0 ~ 92.3),较术前中位评分48.9 (IQR为34.9 ~ 67.5,p < 0.001)有显著改善。多变量分析显示,年龄较大和术前较低的SAFE-Q评分与术后较低的SAFE-Q评分相关(β -0.286 (95% CI -0.486 ~ -0.086)和0.505 (95% CI 0.319 ~ 0.691)。ROC分析发现,当预测术后评分≥90时,术前SAFE-Q(曲线下面积(AUC) 0.644)为54.0,年龄为70岁(AUC 0.722)为截断值。结论:较高的术前SAFE-Q评分和较年轻的手术年龄与术后预后改善有关。虽然其预测准确性有限,但这些阈值可能有助于估计术后功能,并支持术前咨询和共同决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Journal
Bone & Joint Journal ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
318
期刊介绍: We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书