Menstrual Disorder Frequency Across Ibuprofen and Oral Contraceptive Treatment Modalities in Reproductive-Age Women: A Population-Based Analysis Using the NIH All of Us Research Program.
Quinn Fan, Mika Allyssa A Esquillo, Christina M Seeger, Paul W Zarutskie
{"title":"Menstrual Disorder Frequency Across Ibuprofen and Oral Contraceptive Treatment Modalities in Reproductive-Age Women: A Population-Based Analysis Using the NIH <i>All of Us</i> Research Program.","authors":"Quinn Fan, Mika Allyssa A Esquillo, Christina M Seeger, Paul W Zarutskie","doi":"10.1177/26884844261466539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite the widespread use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and oral contraceptives (OC), population-level analyses on how menstrual disorder diagnoses vary across ibuprofen and OC use remain limited. Prior studies emphasize treatment efficacy for individual conditions rather than cross-sectional diagnosis co-occurrence across these treatment categories. The NIH <i>All of Us</i> Research Program enables age-stratified analyses of menstrual disorder diagnoses across ibuprofen and OC use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of female participants 18-35 years old using <i>All of Us</i> data from electronic health records, survey responses, and physical measurements. Participants were stratified into ages 18-24 and 25-35 years and grouped by recorded ibuprofen only, OC only, or ibuprofen + OC exposure. Standardized Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership concept sets identified dysmenorrhea, irregular menstruation, excessive/heavy bleeding, and amenorrhea. Pairwise chi-square tests compared diagnosis presence across treatment groups. The Holm-Bonferroni (HB) adjustment was applied. Treatment duration, dose, adherence, and temporal sequencing relative to diagnosis could not be established.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In women aged 18-24 years, no significant differences in diagnosis prevalence were observed between treatment groups (ibuprofen: <i>n</i> = 2832; OC: <i>n</i> = 4256; and combination: <i>n</i> = 2315). Between-group prevalence differences were modest (0.9 to 2.1 percentage points) and did not remain significant after HB correction (all HB adjusted <i>p</i> > 0.05). Women aged 25-35 years (ibuprofen: <i>n</i> = 9533; OC: <i>n</i> = 9517; and combination: <i>n</i> = 9617) had OC use associated with lower dysmenorrhea prevalence versus combination use (prevalence difference: 1.4%; HB-adjusted <i>p</i> < 0.05). Irregular menstruation was more frequent in the OC group than in the ibuprofen group (2.1%; HB-adjusted <i>p</i> < 0.05). Excessive/heavy bleeding was more prevalent with ibuprofen use than with OC use and combination therapy (2.2% and 1.6%, respectively; HB-adjusted <i>p</i> < 0.05). Amenorrhea prevalence did not differ significantly (≤0.9%; HB-adjusted <i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Menstrual disorder diagnosis frequencies differed across ibuprofen and OC exposure groups, primarily among women 25-35 years old. Longitudinal studies with untreated comparators and better characterizations of treatment timing, dose, and duration are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":75329,"journal":{"name":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","volume":"7 ","pages":"26884844261466539"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13420401/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26884844261466539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Despite the widespread use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and oral contraceptives (OC), population-level analyses on how menstrual disorder diagnoses vary across ibuprofen and OC use remain limited. Prior studies emphasize treatment efficacy for individual conditions rather than cross-sectional diagnosis co-occurrence across these treatment categories. The NIH All of Us Research Program enables age-stratified analyses of menstrual disorder diagnoses across ibuprofen and OC use.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of female participants 18-35 years old using All of Us data from electronic health records, survey responses, and physical measurements. Participants were stratified into ages 18-24 and 25-35 years and grouped by recorded ibuprofen only, OC only, or ibuprofen + OC exposure. Standardized Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership concept sets identified dysmenorrhea, irregular menstruation, excessive/heavy bleeding, and amenorrhea. Pairwise chi-square tests compared diagnosis presence across treatment groups. The Holm-Bonferroni (HB) adjustment was applied. Treatment duration, dose, adherence, and temporal sequencing relative to diagnosis could not be established.
Results: In women aged 18-24 years, no significant differences in diagnosis prevalence were observed between treatment groups (ibuprofen: n = 2832; OC: n = 4256; and combination: n = 2315). Between-group prevalence differences were modest (0.9 to 2.1 percentage points) and did not remain significant after HB correction (all HB adjusted p > 0.05). Women aged 25-35 years (ibuprofen: n = 9533; OC: n = 9517; and combination: n = 9617) had OC use associated with lower dysmenorrhea prevalence versus combination use (prevalence difference: 1.4%; HB-adjusted p < 0.05). Irregular menstruation was more frequent in the OC group than in the ibuprofen group (2.1%; HB-adjusted p < 0.05). Excessive/heavy bleeding was more prevalent with ibuprofen use than with OC use and combination therapy (2.2% and 1.6%, respectively; HB-adjusted p < 0.05). Amenorrhea prevalence did not differ significantly (≤0.9%; HB-adjusted p > 0.05).
Conclusions: Menstrual disorder diagnosis frequencies differed across ibuprofen and OC exposure groups, primarily among women 25-35 years old. Longitudinal studies with untreated comparators and better characterizations of treatment timing, dose, and duration are needed.