Menstrual Disorder Frequency Across Ibuprofen and Oral Contraceptive Treatment Modalities in Reproductive-Age Women: A Population-Based Analysis Using the NIH All of Us Research Program.

IF 1.8 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) Pub Date : 2026-07-05 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26884844261466539
Quinn Fan, Mika Allyssa A Esquillo, Christina M Seeger, Paul W Zarutskie
{"title":"Menstrual Disorder Frequency Across Ibuprofen and Oral Contraceptive Treatment Modalities in Reproductive-Age Women: A Population-Based Analysis Using the NIH <i>All of Us</i> Research Program.","authors":"Quinn Fan, Mika Allyssa A Esquillo, Christina M Seeger, Paul W Zarutskie","doi":"10.1177/26884844261466539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite the widespread use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and oral contraceptives (OC), population-level analyses on how menstrual disorder diagnoses vary across ibuprofen and OC use remain limited. Prior studies emphasize treatment efficacy for individual conditions rather than cross-sectional diagnosis co-occurrence across these treatment categories. The NIH <i>All of Us</i> Research Program enables age-stratified analyses of menstrual disorder diagnoses across ibuprofen and OC use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of female participants 18-35 years old using <i>All of Us</i> data from electronic health records, survey responses, and physical measurements. Participants were stratified into ages 18-24 and 25-35 years and grouped by recorded ibuprofen only, OC only, or ibuprofen + OC exposure. Standardized Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership concept sets identified dysmenorrhea, irregular menstruation, excessive/heavy bleeding, and amenorrhea. Pairwise chi-square tests compared diagnosis presence across treatment groups. The Holm-Bonferroni (HB) adjustment was applied. Treatment duration, dose, adherence, and temporal sequencing relative to diagnosis could not be established.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In women aged 18-24 years, no significant differences in diagnosis prevalence were observed between treatment groups (ibuprofen: <i>n</i> = 2832; OC: <i>n</i> = 4256; and combination: <i>n</i> = 2315). Between-group prevalence differences were modest (0.9 to 2.1 percentage points) and did not remain significant after HB correction (all HB adjusted <i>p</i> > 0.05). Women aged 25-35 years (ibuprofen: <i>n</i> = 9533; OC: <i>n</i> = 9517; and combination: <i>n</i> = 9617) had OC use associated with lower dysmenorrhea prevalence versus combination use (prevalence difference: 1.4%; HB-adjusted <i>p</i> < 0.05). Irregular menstruation was more frequent in the OC group than in the ibuprofen group (2.1%; HB-adjusted <i>p</i> < 0.05). Excessive/heavy bleeding was more prevalent with ibuprofen use than with OC use and combination therapy (2.2% and 1.6%, respectively; HB-adjusted <i>p</i> < 0.05). Amenorrhea prevalence did not differ significantly (≤0.9%; HB-adjusted <i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Menstrual disorder diagnosis frequencies differed across ibuprofen and OC exposure groups, primarily among women 25-35 years old. Longitudinal studies with untreated comparators and better characterizations of treatment timing, dose, and duration are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":75329,"journal":{"name":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","volume":"7 ","pages":"26884844261466539"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13420401/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26884844261466539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the widespread use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and oral contraceptives (OC), population-level analyses on how menstrual disorder diagnoses vary across ibuprofen and OC use remain limited. Prior studies emphasize treatment efficacy for individual conditions rather than cross-sectional diagnosis co-occurrence across these treatment categories. The NIH All of Us Research Program enables age-stratified analyses of menstrual disorder diagnoses across ibuprofen and OC use.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of female participants 18-35 years old using All of Us data from electronic health records, survey responses, and physical measurements. Participants were stratified into ages 18-24 and 25-35 years and grouped by recorded ibuprofen only, OC only, or ibuprofen + OC exposure. Standardized Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership concept sets identified dysmenorrhea, irregular menstruation, excessive/heavy bleeding, and amenorrhea. Pairwise chi-square tests compared diagnosis presence across treatment groups. The Holm-Bonferroni (HB) adjustment was applied. Treatment duration, dose, adherence, and temporal sequencing relative to diagnosis could not be established.

Results: In women aged 18-24 years, no significant differences in diagnosis prevalence were observed between treatment groups (ibuprofen: n = 2832; OC: n = 4256; and combination: n = 2315). Between-group prevalence differences were modest (0.9 to 2.1 percentage points) and did not remain significant after HB correction (all HB adjusted p > 0.05). Women aged 25-35 years (ibuprofen: n = 9533; OC: n = 9517; and combination: n = 9617) had OC use associated with lower dysmenorrhea prevalence versus combination use (prevalence difference: 1.4%; HB-adjusted p < 0.05). Irregular menstruation was more frequent in the OC group than in the ibuprofen group (2.1%; HB-adjusted p < 0.05). Excessive/heavy bleeding was more prevalent with ibuprofen use than with OC use and combination therapy (2.2% and 1.6%, respectively; HB-adjusted p < 0.05). Amenorrhea prevalence did not differ significantly (≤0.9%; HB-adjusted p > 0.05).

Conclusions: Menstrual disorder diagnosis frequencies differed across ibuprofen and OC exposure groups, primarily among women 25-35 years old. Longitudinal studies with untreated comparators and better characterizations of treatment timing, dose, and duration are needed.

在育龄妇女中布洛芬和口服避孕药治疗方式的月经紊乱频率:使用美国国立卫生研究院所有人研究计划的基于人群的分析。
导言:尽管非甾体抗炎药和口服避孕药(OC)的广泛使用,但对布洛芬和口服避孕药在月经紊乱诊断中的差异的人群水平分析仍然有限。先前的研究强调个体疾病的治疗效果,而不是这些治疗类别的横断面诊断共发生。美国国立卫生研究院“我们所有人”研究项目对使用布洛芬和OC的月经紊乱诊断进行了年龄分层分析。方法:我们对18-35岁的女性参与者进行回顾性横断面分析,使用来自电子健康记录、调查回复和身体测量的All of Us数据。参与者分为18-24岁和25-35岁,并根据记录的仅布洛芬、仅OC或布洛芬+ OC剂量分组。标准化观察性医疗结果伙伴关系概念集确定了痛经、月经不调、出血过多/大量和闭经。两两卡方检验比较各治疗组的诊断情况。采用Holm-Bonferroni (HB)调整。治疗时间、剂量、依从性和与诊断相关的时间序列无法确定。结果:在18-24岁的女性中,治疗组之间的诊断患病率无显著差异(布洛芬:n = 2832; OC: n = 4256;联合用药:n = 2315)。组间患病率差异不大(0.9 - 2.1个百分点),并且在HB校正后不保持显著性(所有HB校正p < 0.05)。25-35岁女性(布洛芬:n = 9533; OC: n = 9517;联合用药:n = 9617)使用OC与联合用药相比,痛经发生率较低(患病率差异:1.4%;经hb校正p < 0.05)。OC组月经不规律发生率高于布洛芬组(2.1%,经hb校正p < 0.05)。布洛芬组过度出血/大出血发生率高于丙烯酸组和联合用药组(分别为2.2%和1.6%,经hb校正p < 0.05)。闭经发生率无显著性差异(≤0.9%;hb校正p < 0.05)。结论:月经紊乱的诊断频率在布洛芬和OC暴露组之间存在差异,主要发生在25-35岁的女性中。需要对未经治疗的比较者进行纵向研究,并更好地描述治疗时间、剂量和持续时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书