Reported Characteristics of Anaphylaxis Associated With Glatiramer Acetate: A Pharmacovigilance Analysis of the FDA and Canadian Databases.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Tailei Nie, Hongyu Liu, Chuanxu Cheng, Jian Li, Jiajing Lu
{"title":"Reported Characteristics of Anaphylaxis Associated With Glatiramer Acetate: A Pharmacovigilance Analysis of the FDA and Canadian Databases.","authors":"Tailei Nie, Hongyu Liu, Chuanxu Cheng, Jian Li, Jiajing Lu","doi":"10.1002/prp2.70303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The FDA has mandated a Boxed Warning for glatiramer acetate (GA) due to the risk of serious anaphylactic reaction. This study aimed to characterize the reported features of GA-associated anaphylaxis. Data mining was performed using the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database (Q1 2004-Q1 2025) and the Canadian Vigilance Adverse Reaction (CVAR) database (Q1 1996-Q1 2025). Demographic characteristics, time-to-onset (TTO), and case seriousness were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test or the Chi-squared (χ<sup>2</sup>) test. In the FAERS database, 9816 reports were identified with 29 significant disproportionality signals. Younger age (p < 0.01) was significantly associated with a higher proportion of serious reports. The association between GA and anaphylactic AEs remained statistically significant after stratification by age, body weight, sex, and reporter types. Twenty AEs demonstrated significantly higher reporting rates in serious cases (p < 0.05). Clinical prioritization identified 9 moderate-priority and 20 weak-priority signals. The median TTO was 197 days for moderate-priority signals versus 153 days for weak-priority signals. All signals exhibited early failure-type patterns, indicating that reported anaphylactic events were more frequently observed earlier after treatment initiation than later in treatment. In the CVAR database, 711 reports were identified. A total of 17 PTs overlapped with FAERS, with respiratory arrest uniquely present in CVAR. Three PTs were rated as moderate priority in the CVAR database but weak priority in FAERS. This large-scale pharmacovigilance analysis of the FDA and Canadian databases characterizes the safety signals derived from GA-associated reports of anaphylaxis, providing a hypothesis-generating foundation for future pharmacovigilance validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19948,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacology Research & Perspectives","volume":"14 4","pages":"e70303"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13428025/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacology Research & Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.70303","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The FDA has mandated a Boxed Warning for glatiramer acetate (GA) due to the risk of serious anaphylactic reaction. This study aimed to characterize the reported features of GA-associated anaphylaxis. Data mining was performed using the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database (Q1 2004-Q1 2025) and the Canadian Vigilance Adverse Reaction (CVAR) database (Q1 1996-Q1 2025). Demographic characteristics, time-to-onset (TTO), and case seriousness were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test or the Chi-squared (χ2) test. In the FAERS database, 9816 reports were identified with 29 significant disproportionality signals. Younger age (p < 0.01) was significantly associated with a higher proportion of serious reports. The association between GA and anaphylactic AEs remained statistically significant after stratification by age, body weight, sex, and reporter types. Twenty AEs demonstrated significantly higher reporting rates in serious cases (p < 0.05). Clinical prioritization identified 9 moderate-priority and 20 weak-priority signals. The median TTO was 197 days for moderate-priority signals versus 153 days for weak-priority signals. All signals exhibited early failure-type patterns, indicating that reported anaphylactic events were more frequently observed earlier after treatment initiation than later in treatment. In the CVAR database, 711 reports were identified. A total of 17 PTs overlapped with FAERS, with respiratory arrest uniquely present in CVAR. Three PTs were rated as moderate priority in the CVAR database but weak priority in FAERS. This large-scale pharmacovigilance analysis of the FDA and Canadian databases characterizes the safety signals derived from GA-associated reports of anaphylaxis, providing a hypothesis-generating foundation for future pharmacovigilance validation.

与醋酸格拉替默相关的过敏反应的报告特征:FDA和加拿大数据库的药物警戒分析。
由于严重过敏反应的风险,FDA对醋酸格拉替默(GA)发出了黑框警告。本研究旨在描述已报道的ga相关过敏反应的特征。使用FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库(2004年第一季度- 2025年第一季度)和加拿大警戒性不良反应(CVAR)数据库(1996年第一季度- 2025年第一季度)中的报告优势比(ROR)进行数据挖掘。采用Mann-Whitney U检验或χ2检验比较人口学特征、发病时间(TTO)和病例严重程度。在FAERS数据库中,9816份报告被鉴定出29个显著的歧化信号。年龄较小(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
120
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: PR&P is jointly published by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (ASPET), the British Pharmacological Society (BPS), and Wiley. PR&P is a bi-monthly open access journal that publishes a range of article types, including: target validation (preclinical papers that show a hypothesis is incorrect or papers on drugs that have failed in early clinical development); drug discovery reviews (strategy, hypotheses, and data resulting in a successful therapeutic drug); frontiers in translational medicine (drug and target validation for an unmet therapeutic need); pharmacological hypotheses (reviews that are oriented to inform a novel hypothesis); and replication studies (work that refutes key findings [failed replication] and work that validates key findings). PR&P publishes papers submitted directly to the journal and those referred from the journals of ASPET and the BPS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书