MRI predictive value for adenoma detection in Cushing's disease and reader dependence: a multi-observer study.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of neurosurgery Pub Date : 2026-07-31 Print Date: 2026-10-01 DOI:10.3171/2026.2.JNS252331
Paul Eugène Constanthin, Amandine Ferrière, Francisco Sanchez-Gallardo, Marie-Laure Nunes, Jérôme Berge, Julien Engelhardt
{"title":"MRI predictive value for adenoma detection in Cushing's disease and reader dependence: a multi-observer study.","authors":"Paul Eugène Constanthin, Amandine Ferrière, Francisco Sanchez-Gallardo, Marie-Laure Nunes, Jérôme Berge, Julien Engelhardt","doi":"10.3171/2026.2.JNS252331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>MRI detection of pituitary microadenomas in Cushing's disease is inconsistent, and its impact on surgical outcomes remains debated. Diagnostic performance may vary by reader expertise and interpretation strategy. The authors sought to assess interrater agreement and compare diagnostic accuracy across expert MRI interpretation conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study at a tertiary referral center, preoperative pituitary MRI from 90 patients with biochemically confirmed Cushing's disease who underwent surgery (2012-2022) were independently interpreted by a trained pituitary neuroradiologist and two experienced pituitary neurosurgeons. Interrater agreement (Cohen's κ) and diagnostic performance were evaluated across 5 reading conditions: each reader individually and majority and unanimous voting among the 3 readers. The reference standard was adenoma identification at surgery. The authors calculated sensitivity/specificity-derived metrics, including balanced accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR). Three-month remission rates were compared between MRI-positive and MRI-negative interpretations within each reading condition using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interrater agreement was fair to moderate (κ = 0.34-0.44). Performance differed across reading conditions (global comparison, p < 0.001). The highest diagnostic performance was observed for one neurosurgeon and for unanimous voting (balanced accuracy 0.84 and 0.85; AUC-ROC 0.90 and 0.85, respectively). In these two conditions, an MRI-positive interpretation was associated with improved adenoma identification at surgery and greater 3-month remission compared with MRI-negative interpretations (PLR 4.38 and 15.35; NLR 0.16 and 0.32; OR for remission 12.38 and 10.07, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a surgically selected cohort with confirmed Cushing's disease, MRI localization of corticotroph microadenomas is strongly reader dependent. Consensus interpretation improves performance, and negative MRI are associated with lower remission rates, supporting optimization of preoperative imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1048-1056"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2026.2.JNS252331","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: MRI detection of pituitary microadenomas in Cushing's disease is inconsistent, and its impact on surgical outcomes remains debated. Diagnostic performance may vary by reader expertise and interpretation strategy. The authors sought to assess interrater agreement and compare diagnostic accuracy across expert MRI interpretation conditions.

Methods: In this retrospective study at a tertiary referral center, preoperative pituitary MRI from 90 patients with biochemically confirmed Cushing's disease who underwent surgery (2012-2022) were independently interpreted by a trained pituitary neuroradiologist and two experienced pituitary neurosurgeons. Interrater agreement (Cohen's κ) and diagnostic performance were evaluated across 5 reading conditions: each reader individually and majority and unanimous voting among the 3 readers. The reference standard was adenoma identification at surgery. The authors calculated sensitivity/specificity-derived metrics, including balanced accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR). Three-month remission rates were compared between MRI-positive and MRI-negative interpretations within each reading condition using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals.

Results: Interrater agreement was fair to moderate (κ = 0.34-0.44). Performance differed across reading conditions (global comparison, p < 0.001). The highest diagnostic performance was observed for one neurosurgeon and for unanimous voting (balanced accuracy 0.84 and 0.85; AUC-ROC 0.90 and 0.85, respectively). In these two conditions, an MRI-positive interpretation was associated with improved adenoma identification at surgery and greater 3-month remission compared with MRI-negative interpretations (PLR 4.38 and 15.35; NLR 0.16 and 0.32; OR for remission 12.38 and 10.07, respectively).

Conclusions: In a surgically selected cohort with confirmed Cushing's disease, MRI localization of corticotroph microadenomas is strongly reader dependent. Consensus interpretation improves performance, and negative MRI are associated with lower remission rates, supporting optimization of preoperative imaging.

库欣病腺瘤的MRI预测价值及读者依赖:一项多观察者研究。
目的:库欣病垂体微腺瘤的MRI检测不一致,其对手术结果的影响仍有争议。诊断性能可能因读者专业知识和解释策略而异。作者试图评估解释者的一致性,并比较专家MRI解释条件下的诊断准确性。方法:在三级转诊中心的回顾性研究中,由一名训练有素的垂体神经放射学家和两名经验丰富的垂体神经外科医生独立解释90例经生化证实的库欣病手术患者(2012-2022)的术前垂体MRI。通读者一致性(Cohen’s κ)和诊断性能在5种阅读条件下进行评估:每个阅读者单独以及3名阅读者的多数和一致投票。参照标准为手术时的腺瘤鉴别。作者计算了敏感性/特异性衍生指标,包括平衡精度、受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC-ROC)、阳性似然比(PLR)和负似然比(NLR)。使用95%置信区间的比值比(ORs)比较每个阅读条件下mri阳性和mri阴性解释的三个月缓解率。结果:评分者一致性为一般至中等(κ = 0.34-0.44)。不同阅读条件下的表现不同(全局比较,p < 0.001)。一位神经外科医生和一致投票的诊断表现最高(平衡准确率分别为0.84和0.85;AUC-ROC分别为0.90和0.85)。在这两种情况下,与mri阴性解释相比,mri阳性解释与手术时腺瘤识别的改善和3个月的缓解有关(PLR为4.38和15.35;NLR为0.16和0.32;缓解的OR分别为12.38和10.07)。结论:在手术选择的确诊库欣病队列中,促皮质微腺瘤的MRI定位是高度依赖于读者的。共识解释提高了表现,MRI阴性与较低的缓解率相关,支持优化术前成像。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书