Diagnostic utility of bilateral stereoelectroencephalography sampling in temporal lobe epilepsy.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Martin A Merenzon, Kurt R Lehner, Jonathan Ho, Shovan Bhatia, Joon Y Kang, Khalil S Husari, Nathan E Crone, Shenandoah Robinson, William S Anderson
{"title":"Diagnostic utility of bilateral stereoelectroencephalography sampling in temporal lobe epilepsy.","authors":"Martin A Merenzon, Kurt R Lehner, Jonathan Ho, Shovan Bhatia, Joon Y Kang, Khalil S Husari, Nathan E Crone, Shenandoah Robinson, William S Anderson","doi":"10.3171/2026.2.JNS252667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is the most common form of medically refractory epilepsy in adults. While patients with concordant noninvasive findings and hippocampal sclerosis (HS) might proceed directly to surgery, those with discordant data, suspected bilateral involvement, or atypical presentation often require stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG). The diagnostic and therapeutic implications of bilateral temporal sampling remain uncertain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the yield and clinical impact of bilateral SEEG in TLE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors retrospectively reviewed data collected from patients with medically refractory epilepsy who underwent bilateral SEEG at a single institution from March 2017 and June 2025. Inclusion criteria were a pre-SEEG hypothesis of temporal onset, nonlesional or mesial TLE, with or without HS, and bilateral hippocampal/amygdala sampling. Patients were grouped as concordant, discordant, or bilateral based on pre-SEEG noninvasive data. The diagnostic yield, number of SEEG studies required to alter 1 patient's initial hypothesis, and seizure outcomes were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 197 patients who underwent SEEG, 54 met inclusion criteria. Pre-SEEG hypotheses were concordant in 20 patients, discordant in 8 patients, and bilateral in 26 patients. SEEG revealed contralateral or bilateral seizure onset in 35% of concordant cases and confirmed unilateral onset in 46% of presumed bilateral cases. Overall, 21% of presumed unilateral TLE showed bilateral involvement. The number needed to treat was 2.9 for the concordant group and 2.2 for the bilateral group. Following SEEG, 38 patients underwent resection, laser ablation, or neuromodulation. At the last follow-up, 49% of patients achieved Engel class I or II outcomes, with best results for those with resection/ablation (79% Engel class I or II).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bilateral SEEG provides clinically meaningful information in both unilateral and bilateral TLE, uncovering contralateral involvement in presumed unilateral cases and confirming unilateral foci in nearly half of presumed bilateral cases. Although SEEG is not necessary for all patients with TLE-HS and concordant studies, when it is indicated, bilateral sampling might be important to avoid misclassification and guide resective/ablative versus neuromodulatory treatment planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2026.2.JNS252667","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is the most common form of medically refractory epilepsy in adults. While patients with concordant noninvasive findings and hippocampal sclerosis (HS) might proceed directly to surgery, those with discordant data, suspected bilateral involvement, or atypical presentation often require stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG). The diagnostic and therapeutic implications of bilateral temporal sampling remain uncertain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the yield and clinical impact of bilateral SEEG in TLE.

Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed data collected from patients with medically refractory epilepsy who underwent bilateral SEEG at a single institution from March 2017 and June 2025. Inclusion criteria were a pre-SEEG hypothesis of temporal onset, nonlesional or mesial TLE, with or without HS, and bilateral hippocampal/amygdala sampling. Patients were grouped as concordant, discordant, or bilateral based on pre-SEEG noninvasive data. The diagnostic yield, number of SEEG studies required to alter 1 patient's initial hypothesis, and seizure outcomes were analyzed.

Results: Of 197 patients who underwent SEEG, 54 met inclusion criteria. Pre-SEEG hypotheses were concordant in 20 patients, discordant in 8 patients, and bilateral in 26 patients. SEEG revealed contralateral or bilateral seizure onset in 35% of concordant cases and confirmed unilateral onset in 46% of presumed bilateral cases. Overall, 21% of presumed unilateral TLE showed bilateral involvement. The number needed to treat was 2.9 for the concordant group and 2.2 for the bilateral group. Following SEEG, 38 patients underwent resection, laser ablation, or neuromodulation. At the last follow-up, 49% of patients achieved Engel class I or II outcomes, with best results for those with resection/ablation (79% Engel class I or II).

Conclusions: Bilateral SEEG provides clinically meaningful information in both unilateral and bilateral TLE, uncovering contralateral involvement in presumed unilateral cases and confirming unilateral foci in nearly half of presumed bilateral cases. Although SEEG is not necessary for all patients with TLE-HS and concordant studies, when it is indicated, bilateral sampling might be important to avoid misclassification and guide resective/ablative versus neuromodulatory treatment planning.

双侧立体脑电图取样对颞叶癫痫的诊断价值。
目的:颞叶癫痫(TLE)是成人最常见的医学难治性癫痫。无创表现一致且伴有海马硬化(HS)的患者可直接进行手术,而数据不一致、怀疑双侧受损伤或表现不典型的患者通常需要立体脑电图(SEEG)。双侧颞叶取样的诊断和治疗意义仍然不确定。本研究的目的是评估双侧SEEG治疗TLE的疗效和临床效果。方法:作者回顾性分析了2017年3月至2025年6月在同一机构接受双侧SEEG治疗的难治性癫痫患者的数据。纳入标准是颞发病的seeg前假设,非病变性或中位性TLE,伴或不伴HS,双侧海马/杏仁核取样。根据seeg前无创数据将患者分为和谐型、不和谐型或双侧型。分析了诊断率、改变1例患者初始假设所需的SEEG研究数量和癫痫发作结果。结果:197例患者接受SEEG治疗,54例符合纳入标准。预seeg假设一致的有20例,不一致的有8例,双侧的有26例。SEEG显示对侧或双侧癫痫发作在35%的一致病例中,46%的推定双侧病例证实单侧癫痫发作。总体而言,21%的假定单侧TLE表现为双侧受累。和谐组需要治疗的人数为2.9人,双侧组为2.2人。在SEEG之后,38名患者接受了切除、激光消融或神经调节。在最后一次随访中,49%的患者达到了Engel I级或II级结果,切除/消融患者的结果最好(79%的患者达到了Engel I级或II级)。结论:双侧SEEG为单侧和双侧TLE提供了有临床意义的信息,在推定的单侧病例中发现对侧受累,在近一半的推定双侧病例中确认单侧病灶。虽然并非所有的TLE-HS患者和相关研究都需要SEEG,但当需要时,双侧取样对于避免错误分类和指导切除/消融与神经调节治疗计划可能很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书