Reassessing the risk of hemorrhage progression in mild traumatic brain injury: the role of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of neurosurgery Pub Date : 2026-07-31 Print Date: 2026-10-01 DOI:10.3171/2026.2.JNS252985
Tessa A Harland, Gregory Topp, Tarun Prabhala, Sruti Bandlamuri, Rachel Thiets, Fernando Figueroa, Samuel Ortiz, Matthew A Adamo, John Dalfino, Alexandra R Paul, John German, Junichi Yamamoto, Darryl DiRisio, Alan Boulos, Pouya Entezami
{"title":"Reassessing the risk of hemorrhage progression in mild traumatic brain injury: the role of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy.","authors":"Tessa A Harland, Gregory Topp, Tarun Prabhala, Sruti Bandlamuri, Rachel Thiets, Fernando Figueroa, Samuel Ortiz, Matthew A Adamo, John Dalfino, Alexandra R Paul, John German, Junichi Yamamoto, Darryl DiRisio, Alan Boulos, Pouya Entezami","doi":"10.3171/2026.2.JNS252985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In patients with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI; Glasgow Coma Scale scores 13-15), the presence of anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy, collectively referred to as blood thinners (BTs), has been presumed to elevate the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) progression. Current Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) automatically classify all patients receiving BTs as high-risk (modified BIG [mBIG] 3), requiring hospital admission and repeat imaging. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether BTs independently increase the risk of hemorrhage progression, surgical intervention, or mortality in mild TBI with ICH, and whether risk varies by specific BT agent.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study of 2312 adult patients presenting with mild TBI and traumatic ICH at a level 1 trauma center (2016-2021). Patients were categorized by mBIG criteria and then reclassified using hemorrhage characteristics (reclassified mBIG [RmBIG]), excluding BT status. Outcomes included radiographic progression, surgical intervention, and in-hospital mortality. A subgroup analysis was performed to assess outcomes by specific BT type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Radiographic progression occurred in 14.1% of mBIG 3 patients versus 1.7% and 6.8% of mBIG 1 and 2 patients, respectively. Among reclassified patients, those receiving BTs had similar progression rates to non-BT patients within the same RmBIG category. Patients classified as mBIG 3 based only on BT use had significantly lower progression rates (11.9%) compared with those classified based on hemorrhage severity (18.1%, p < 0.001). Mortality and surgical intervention rates did not differ overall by BT status. In the BT subgroup analysis, warfarin was the only agent significantly associated with increased radiographic progression (OR 1.93, p = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy might not warrant automatic classification of all patients with mild TBI as high risk. While warfarin represents the upper end of the risk spectrum, most agents did not increase adverse outcomes. Refining BIG to incorporate hemorrhage features and agent-specific risk might improve patient care and resource utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1081-1088"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2026.2.JNS252985","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In patients with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI; Glasgow Coma Scale scores 13-15), the presence of anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy, collectively referred to as blood thinners (BTs), has been presumed to elevate the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) progression. Current Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) automatically classify all patients receiving BTs as high-risk (modified BIG [mBIG] 3), requiring hospital admission and repeat imaging. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether BTs independently increase the risk of hemorrhage progression, surgical intervention, or mortality in mild TBI with ICH, and whether risk varies by specific BT agent.

Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study of 2312 adult patients presenting with mild TBI and traumatic ICH at a level 1 trauma center (2016-2021). Patients were categorized by mBIG criteria and then reclassified using hemorrhage characteristics (reclassified mBIG [RmBIG]), excluding BT status. Outcomes included radiographic progression, surgical intervention, and in-hospital mortality. A subgroup analysis was performed to assess outcomes by specific BT type.

Results: Radiographic progression occurred in 14.1% of mBIG 3 patients versus 1.7% and 6.8% of mBIG 1 and 2 patients, respectively. Among reclassified patients, those receiving BTs had similar progression rates to non-BT patients within the same RmBIG category. Patients classified as mBIG 3 based only on BT use had significantly lower progression rates (11.9%) compared with those classified based on hemorrhage severity (18.1%, p < 0.001). Mortality and surgical intervention rates did not differ overall by BT status. In the BT subgroup analysis, warfarin was the only agent significantly associated with increased radiographic progression (OR 1.93, p = 0.01).

Conclusions: Anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy might not warrant automatic classification of all patients with mild TBI as high risk. While warfarin represents the upper end of the risk spectrum, most agents did not increase adverse outcomes. Refining BIG to incorporate hemorrhage features and agent-specific risk might improve patient care and resource utilization.

重新评估轻度外伤性脑损伤出血进展的风险:抗凝血和抗血小板治疗的作用。
目的:在轻度创伤性脑损伤(TBI;格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分13-15分)患者中,抗凝或抗血小板治疗(统称为血液稀释剂(BTs))的存在被认为会增加颅内出血(ICH)进展的风险。目前的脑损伤指南(BIG)自动将所有接受bt治疗的患者分类为高风险(修改BIG [mBIG] 3),需要住院并重复影像学检查。本研究的目的是评估BT是否单独增加轻度TBI合并脑出血的出血进展、手术干预或死亡率的风险,以及这种风险是否因特定的BT剂而异。方法:作者对某一级创伤中心(2016-2021年)2312例患有轻度TBI和外伤性脑出血的成年患者进行了回顾性队列研究。根据mBIG标准对患者进行分类,然后根据出血特征进行重新分类(reclassified mBIG [RmBIG]),排除BT状态。结果包括影像学进展、手术干预和住院死亡率。进行亚组分析以评估特定BT类型的结果。结果:影像学进展发生在14.1%的mBIG 3患者中,而mBIG 1和2患者分别为1.7%和6.8%。在重新分类的患者中,在相同的RmBIG类别中,接受bt治疗的患者与非bt患者的进展率相似。与基于出血严重程度(18.1%,p < 0.001)分类的患者相比,仅基于BT使用分类的mBIG 3患者的进展率(11.9%)显着降低。BT状态的死亡率和手术干预率总体上没有差异。在BT亚组分析中,华法林是唯一与放射学进展增加显著相关的药物(OR 1.93, p = 0.01)。结论:抗凝和抗血小板治疗可能不能保证将所有轻度TBI患者自动分类为高风险。虽然华法林代表了风险谱的上限,但大多数药物不会增加不良后果。改进BIG以纳入出血特征和药物特异性风险可能改善患者护理和资源利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书