Performance of Urine Tumor DNA Detection in Patients with High-grade Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Undergoing Repeat Transurethral Resection.

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
European urology focus Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-31 DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2026.06.002
Jay Ogunkeye, Eugene Shkolyar, Kathleen E Mach, Sophia Prendiville, Kris Prado, Jay B Shah, Eila C Skinner, Daniel S Fischer, Kevin G Phillips, Vincent T Bicocca, Trevor G Levin, Joseph C Liao
{"title":"Performance of Urine Tumor DNA Detection in Patients with High-grade Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Undergoing Repeat Transurethral Resection.","authors":"Jay Ogunkeye, Eugene Shkolyar, Kathleen E Mach, Sophia Prendiville, Kris Prado, Jay B Shah, Eila C Skinner, Daniel S Fischer, Kevin G Phillips, Vincent T Bicocca, Trevor G Levin, Joseph C Liao","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2026.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Patients with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) experience high recurrence rates and potential understaging, supporting guideline recommendations for repeat transurethral resection (reTUR). However, identifying patients best suited for reTUR remains challenging. Here, we analyze urine tumor DNA (utDNA) for mutations associated with urothelial cancer in a cohort of patients undergoing reTUR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective evaluation of urine samples from 43 patients with pathologically confirmed high-grade NMIBC who were undergoing reTUR. Urine was collected immediately prior to reTUR and evaluated using UroAmp. The primary objective of this study was to compare utDNA disease classification with pathological staging from reTUR. Prognostic (high/low-risk) and minimal residual disease (MRD) (positive/negative) classifications were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>The stage distribution from reTUR was 32% T0 (no residual disease), 29% Ta ±CIS, 28% T1 ±CIS, and 11% T2. Prognostic risk classification had 97% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 86-100) and 89% negative predictive value (95% CI 59-99). MRD classification had 80% specificity (95% CI 56-94) and 88% positive predictive value (95% CI 72-97). When long-term recurrence outcomes were considered, positive predictive value increased to 92% (95% CI 78-98) for both classification algorithms. Among T0 samples, utDNA high-risk patients had recurrence-free survival of 36%, compared to 100% for utDNA low-risk patients (p = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>utDNA testing identifies residual disease prior to reTUR. utDNA can serve as an adjunct following initial transurethral resection, aiding in the assessment of resection completeness, determining the need and timing of repeat resection, and stratifying risk of future recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":"931-938"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2026.06.002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Patients with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) experience high recurrence rates and potential understaging, supporting guideline recommendations for repeat transurethral resection (reTUR). However, identifying patients best suited for reTUR remains challenging. Here, we analyze urine tumor DNA (utDNA) for mutations associated with urothelial cancer in a cohort of patients undergoing reTUR.

Methods: Retrospective evaluation of urine samples from 43 patients with pathologically confirmed high-grade NMIBC who were undergoing reTUR. Urine was collected immediately prior to reTUR and evaluated using UroAmp. The primary objective of this study was to compare utDNA disease classification with pathological staging from reTUR. Prognostic (high/low-risk) and minimal residual disease (MRD) (positive/negative) classifications were evaluated.

Key findings and limitations: The stage distribution from reTUR was 32% T0 (no residual disease), 29% Ta ±CIS, 28% T1 ±CIS, and 11% T2. Prognostic risk classification had 97% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 86-100) and 89% negative predictive value (95% CI 59-99). MRD classification had 80% specificity (95% CI 56-94) and 88% positive predictive value (95% CI 72-97). When long-term recurrence outcomes were considered, positive predictive value increased to 92% (95% CI 78-98) for both classification algorithms. Among T0 samples, utDNA high-risk patients had recurrence-free survival of 36%, compared to 100% for utDNA low-risk patients (p = 0.006).

Conclusions and clinical implications: utDNA testing identifies residual disease prior to reTUR. utDNA can serve as an adjunct following initial transurethral resection, aiding in the assessment of resection completeness, determining the need and timing of repeat resection, and stratifying risk of future recurrence.

高度非肌肉侵袭性膀胱癌经尿道重复切除患者尿液肿瘤DNA检测的效果。
背景和目的:高风险非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)患者具有高复发率和潜在的分期不足,支持指南建议的重复经尿道切除术(reTUR)。然而,确定最适合回归的患者仍然具有挑战性。在这里,我们分析了尿肿瘤DNA (utDNA)突变与尿路上皮癌在一个队列患者接受回流。方法:回顾性分析43例经病理证实的高级别NMIBC患者的尿液样本。返回前立即收集尿液并使用UroAmp进行评估。本研究的主要目的是比较utDNA疾病分类与复发的病理分期。评估预后(高风险/低风险)和最小残留病(MRD)(阳性/阴性)分类。主要发现和局限性:复发的分期分布为32% T0(无残留疾病),29% Ta±CIS, 28% T1±CIS, 11% T2。预后风险分类的敏感性为97%(95%置信区间[CI] 86-100),阴性预测值为89% (95% CI 59-99)。MRD分类有80%的特异性(95% CI 56-94)和88%的阳性预测值(95% CI 72-97)。当考虑长期复发结果时,两种分类算法的阳性预测值增加到92% (95% CI 78-98)。在T0个样本中,utDNA高危患者的无复发生存率为36%,而utDNA低危患者的无复发生存率为100% (p = 0.006)。结论和临床意义:utDNA检测可识别复发前的残留疾病。utDNA可以作为初次经尿道切除术后的辅助检查,有助于评估切除术的完整性,确定重复切除术的需要和时间,并对未来复发的风险进行分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European urology focus
European urology focus Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: European Urology Focus is a new sister journal to European Urology and an official publication of the European Association of Urology (EAU). EU Focus will publish original articles, opinion piece editorials and topical reviews on a wide range of urological issues such as oncology, functional urology, reconstructive urology, laparoscopy, robotic surgery, endourology, female urology, andrology, paediatric urology and sexual medicine. The editorial team welcome basic and translational research articles in the field of urological diseases. Authors may be solicited by the Editor directly. All submitted manuscripts will be peer-reviewed by a panel of experts before being considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书