Preoperative electrocardiography for predicting cardiovascular events after noncardiac surgery: a secondary analysis of two prospective cohorts

IF 10.3 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
British journal of anaesthesia Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-31 DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2026.06.025
Xiao-Yu Zhuo, Peng Dong, Shao-Hui Lei, Bo Liu, Neng-Wen Xu, Shan Jiang, Cai Li, Ke-Xuan Liu, Bing-Cheng Zhao
{"title":"Preoperative electrocardiography for predicting cardiovascular events after noncardiac surgery: a secondary analysis of two prospective cohorts","authors":"Xiao-Yu Zhuo,&nbsp;Peng Dong,&nbsp;Shao-Hui Lei,&nbsp;Bo Liu,&nbsp;Neng-Wen Xu,&nbsp;Shan Jiang,&nbsp;Cai Li,&nbsp;Ke-Xuan Liu,&nbsp;Bing-Cheng Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2026.06.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The predictive value of preoperative resting ECGs for cardiovascular events after noncardiac surgery is unclear. This study evaluated whether incorporating conventional ECG features or the output of a deep-learning algorithm for ECG waveform analysis (PreOpNet) improves risk prediction beyond established clinical risk scores.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a secondary analysis of two prospective cohorts of patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery in China between 2019 and 2023. Eight prespecified conventional ECG features were extracted from ECG reports, and raw ECG waveforms were analysed using PreOpNet. The primary outcome was a composite of any cardiovascular events within 30 days after surgery; the secondary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). We built nested logistic regression models based on clinical risk scores, with or without ECG findings. Predictive performance was evaluated using area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC), risk reclassification metrics, and decision curve analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 6080 patients, 733 (12.1%) experienced postoperative cardiovascular events and 174 (2.9%) had MACEs. Adding conventional ECG features (ΔAUC 0.035) or PreOpNet (ΔAUC 0.032) to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index improved model discrimination modestly. When added to the Gupta Perioperative Myocardial Infarction or Cardiac Arrest risk score, both approaches yielded minimal gains (ΔAUC 0.010 for conventional ECG features; 0.006 for PreOpNet). Risk reclassification and decision curve analyses had limited incremental predictive value.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Preoperative ECG findings, assessed by including conventional waveform features and the PreOpNet algorithm, provide limited incremental predictive value for cardiovascular risk assessment before noncardiac surgery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":"137 4","pages":"Pages 1006-1016"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007091226005015","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The predictive value of preoperative resting ECGs for cardiovascular events after noncardiac surgery is unclear. This study evaluated whether incorporating conventional ECG features or the output of a deep-learning algorithm for ECG waveform analysis (PreOpNet) improves risk prediction beyond established clinical risk scores.

Methods

We conducted a secondary analysis of two prospective cohorts of patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery in China between 2019 and 2023. Eight prespecified conventional ECG features were extracted from ECG reports, and raw ECG waveforms were analysed using PreOpNet. The primary outcome was a composite of any cardiovascular events within 30 days after surgery; the secondary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). We built nested logistic regression models based on clinical risk scores, with or without ECG findings. Predictive performance was evaluated using area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC), risk reclassification metrics, and decision curve analyses.

Results

Among 6080 patients, 733 (12.1%) experienced postoperative cardiovascular events and 174 (2.9%) had MACEs. Adding conventional ECG features (ΔAUC 0.035) or PreOpNet (ΔAUC 0.032) to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index improved model discrimination modestly. When added to the Gupta Perioperative Myocardial Infarction or Cardiac Arrest risk score, both approaches yielded minimal gains (ΔAUC 0.010 for conventional ECG features; 0.006 for PreOpNet). Risk reclassification and decision curve analyses had limited incremental predictive value.

Conclusions

Preoperative ECG findings, assessed by including conventional waveform features and the PreOpNet algorithm, provide limited incremental predictive value for cardiovascular risk assessment before noncardiac surgery.
术前心电图预测非心脏手术后心血管事件:对两个前瞻性队列的二次分析。
背景:术前静息心电图对非心脏手术后心血管事件的预测价值尚不清楚。本研究评估了结合传统ECG特征或ECG波形分析的深度学习算法(PreOpNet)的输出是否可以提高风险预测,超越既定的临床风险评分。方法:我们对2019年至2023年在中国接受重大非心脏手术的患者的两个前瞻性队列进行了二次分析。从心电报告中提取8个预先指定的常规心电特征,并使用PreOpNet对原始心电波形进行分析。主要终点是手术后30天内任何心血管事件的综合;次要终点为主要心脏不良事件(mace)。我们建立了基于临床风险评分的嵌套逻辑回归模型,无论有无心电图结果。预测性能通过接受者-工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、风险再分类指标和决策曲线分析进行评估。结果:6080例患者中,733例(12.1%)发生了术后心血管事件,174例(2.9%)发生了mace。将常规心电图特征(ΔAUC 0.035)或PreOpNet (ΔAUC 0.032)添加到修订后的心脏风险指数中,可以略微提高模型的辨别能力。当加入Gupta围手术期心肌梗死或心脏骤停风险评分时,两种方法的收益都很小(ΔAUC 0.010常规心电图特征;0.006 PreOpNet)。风险再分类和决策曲线分析的增量预测价值有限。结论:术前心电图结果,包括常规波形特征和PreOpNet算法评估,为非心脏手术前心血管风险评估提供有限的增量预测价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
488
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience. The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence. Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书